Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
At a lemonade stand, each lemonade costs $5. Customers are standing in a queue to buy from you and order one at a time (in the order specified by bills). Each customer will only buy one lemonade and pay with either a $5, $10, or $20 bill. You must provide the correct change to each customer so that the net transaction is that the customer pays $5.
Note that you do not have any change in hand at first.
Given an integer array bills where bills[i] is the bill the ith customer pays, return true if you can provide every customer with the correct change, or false otherwise.
Example 1:
Input: bills = [5,5,5,10,20] Output: true Explanation: From the first 3 customers, we collect three $5 bills in order. From the fourth customer, we collect a $10 bill and give back a $5. From the fifth customer, we give a $10 bill and a $5 bill. Since all customers got correct change, we output true.
Example 2:
Input: bills = [5,5,10,10,20] Output: false Explanation: From the first two customers in order, we collect two $5 bills. For the next two customers in order, we collect a $10 bill and give back a $5 bill. For the last customer, we can not give the change of $15 back because we only have two $10 bills. Since not every customer received the correct change, the answer is false.
Constraints:
1 <= bills.length <= 105bills[i] is either 5, 10, or 20.Problem summary: At a lemonade stand, each lemonade costs $5. Customers are standing in a queue to buy from you and order one at a time (in the order specified by bills). Each customer will only buy one lemonade and pay with either a $5, $10, or $20 bill. You must provide the correct change to each customer so that the net transaction is that the customer pays $5. Note that you do not have any change in hand at first. Given an integer array bills where bills[i] is the bill the ith customer pays, return true if you can provide every customer with the correct change, or false otherwise.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Greedy
[5,5,5,10,20]
[5,5,10,10,20]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #860: Lemonade Change
class Solution {
public boolean lemonadeChange(int[] bills) {
int five = 0, ten = 0;
for (int v : bills) {
switch (v) {
case 5 -> ++five;
case 10 -> {
++ten;
--five;
}
case 20 -> {
if (ten > 0) {
--ten;
--five;
} else {
five -= 3;
}
}
}
if (five < 0) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #860: Lemonade Change
func lemonadeChange(bills []int) bool {
five, ten := 0, 0
for _, v := range bills {
if v == 5 {
five++
} else if v == 10 {
ten++
five--
} else {
if ten > 0 {
ten--
five--
} else {
five -= 3
}
}
if five < 0 {
return false
}
}
return true
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #860: Lemonade Change
class Solution:
def lemonadeChange(self, bills: List[int]) -> bool:
five = ten = 0
for v in bills:
if v == 5:
five += 1
elif v == 10:
ten += 1
five -= 1
else:
if ten:
ten -= 1
five -= 1
else:
five -= 3
if five < 0:
return False
return True
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #860: Lemonade Change
impl Solution {
pub fn lemonade_change(bills: Vec<i32>) -> bool {
let (mut five, mut ten) = (0, 0);
for bill in bills.iter() {
match bill {
5 => {
five += 1;
}
10 => {
five -= 1;
ten += 1;
}
_ => {
if ten != 0 {
ten -= 1;
five -= 1;
} else {
five -= 3;
}
}
}
if five < 0 {
return false;
}
}
true
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #860: Lemonade Change
function lemonadeChange(bills: number[]): boolean {
let [five, ten] = [0, 0];
for (const x of bills) {
switch (x) {
case 5:
five++;
break;
case 10:
five--;
ten++;
break;
case 20:
if (ten) {
ten--;
five--;
} else {
five -= 3;
}
break;
}
if (five < 0) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Try every possible combination of choices. With n items each having two states (include/exclude), the search space is 2ⁿ. Evaluating each combination takes O(n), giving O(n × 2ⁿ). The recursion stack or subset storage uses O(n) space.
Greedy algorithms typically sort the input (O(n log n)) then make a single pass (O(n)). The sort dominates. If the input is already sorted or the greedy choice can be computed without sorting, time drops to O(n). Proving greedy correctness (exchange argument) is harder than the implementation.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.
Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.
Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.