Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
There is a group of n people labeled from 0 to n - 1 where each person has a different amount of money and a different level of quietness.
You are given an array richer where richer[i] = [ai, bi] indicates that ai has more money than bi and an integer array quiet where quiet[i] is the quietness of the ith person. All the given data in richer are logically correct (i.e., the data will not lead you to a situation where x is richer than y and y is richer than x at the same time).
Return an integer array answer where answer[x] = y if y is the least quiet person (that is, the person y with the smallest value of quiet[y]) among all people who definitely have equal to or more money than the person x.
Example 1:
Input: richer = [[1,0],[2,1],[3,1],[3,7],[4,3],[5,3],[6,3]], quiet = [3,2,5,4,6,1,7,0] Output: [5,5,2,5,4,5,6,7] Explanation: answer[0] = 5. Person 5 has more money than 3, which has more money than 1, which has more money than 0. The only person who is quieter (has lower quiet[x]) is person 7, but it is not clear if they have more money than person 0. answer[7] = 7. Among all people that definitely have equal to or more money than person 7 (which could be persons 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7), the person who is the quietest (has lower quiet[x]) is person 7. The other answers can be filled out with similar reasoning.
Example 2:
Input: richer = [], quiet = [0] Output: [0]
Constraints:
n == quiet.length1 <= n <= 5000 <= quiet[i] < nquiet are unique.0 <= richer.length <= n * (n - 1) / 20 <= ai, bi < nai != biricher are unique.richer are all logically consistent.Problem summary: There is a group of n people labeled from 0 to n - 1 where each person has a different amount of money and a different level of quietness. You are given an array richer where richer[i] = [ai, bi] indicates that ai has more money than bi and an integer array quiet where quiet[i] is the quietness of the ith person. All the given data in richer are logically correct (i.e., the data will not lead you to a situation where x is richer than y and y is richer than x at the same time). Return an integer array answer where answer[x] = y if y is the least quiet person (that is, the person y with the smallest value of quiet[y]) among all people who definitely have equal to or more money than the person x.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Topological Sort
[[1,0],[2,1],[3,1],[3,7],[4,3],[5,3],[6,3]] [3,2,5,4,6,1,7,0]
[] [0]
build-a-matrix-with-conditions)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #851: Loud and Rich
class Solution {
private List<Integer>[] g;
private int n;
private int[] quiet;
private int[] ans;
public int[] loudAndRich(int[][] richer, int[] quiet) {
n = quiet.length;
this.quiet = quiet;
g = new List[n];
ans = new int[n];
Arrays.fill(ans, -1);
Arrays.setAll(g, k -> new ArrayList<>());
for (var r : richer) {
g[r[1]].add(r[0]);
}
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
dfs(i);
}
return ans;
}
private void dfs(int i) {
if (ans[i] != -1) {
return;
}
ans[i] = i;
for (int j : g[i]) {
dfs(j);
if (quiet[ans[j]] < quiet[ans[i]]) {
ans[i] = ans[j];
}
}
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #851: Loud and Rich
func loudAndRich(richer [][]int, quiet []int) []int {
n := len(quiet)
g := make([][]int, n)
ans := make([]int, n)
for i := range g {
ans[i] = -1
}
for _, r := range richer {
a, b := r[0], r[1]
g[b] = append(g[b], a)
}
var dfs func(int)
dfs = func(i int) {
if ans[i] != -1 {
return
}
ans[i] = i
for _, j := range g[i] {
dfs(j)
if quiet[ans[j]] < quiet[ans[i]] {
ans[i] = ans[j]
}
}
}
for i := range ans {
dfs(i)
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #851: Loud and Rich
class Solution:
def loudAndRich(self, richer: List[List[int]], quiet: List[int]) -> List[int]:
def dfs(i: int):
if ans[i] != -1:
return
ans[i] = i
for j in g[i]:
dfs(j)
if quiet[ans[j]] < quiet[ans[i]]:
ans[i] = ans[j]
g = defaultdict(list)
for a, b in richer:
g[b].append(a)
n = len(quiet)
ans = [-1] * n
for i in range(n):
dfs(i)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #851: Loud and Rich
struct Solution;
use std::collections::HashSet;
impl Solution {
fn loud_and_rich(richer: Vec<Vec<i32>>, quiet: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<i32> {
let n = quiet.len();
let mut graph: Vec<HashSet<usize>> = vec![HashSet::new(); n];
for e in richer {
let u = e[0] as usize;
let v = e[1] as usize;
graph[v].insert(u);
}
let mut res = vec![n; n];
for i in 0..n {
Self::dfs(i, &mut res, &graph, &quiet, n);
}
res.into_iter().map(|x| x as i32).collect()
}
fn dfs(
u: usize,
stack: &mut Vec<usize>,
graph: &[HashSet<usize>],
quiet: &[i32],
n: usize,
) -> usize {
if stack[u] == n {
stack[u] = u;
for &v in &graph[u] {
let w = Self::dfs(v, stack, graph, quiet, n);
if quiet[w] < quiet[stack[u]] {
stack[u] = w;
}
}
}
stack[u]
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let richer = vec_vec_i32![[1, 0], [2, 1], [3, 1], [3, 7], [4, 3], [5, 3], [6, 3]];
let quiet = vec![3, 2, 5, 4, 6, 1, 7, 0];
let res = vec![5, 5, 2, 5, 4, 5, 6, 7];
assert_eq!(Solution::loud_and_rich(richer, quiet), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #851: Loud and Rich
function loudAndRich(richer: number[][], quiet: number[]): number[] {
const n = quiet.length;
const g: number[][] = new Array(n).fill(0).map(() => []);
for (const [a, b] of richer) {
g[b].push(a);
}
const ans: number[] = new Array(n).fill(-1);
const dfs = (i: number) => {
if (ans[i] != -1) {
return ans;
}
ans[i] = i;
for (const j of g[i]) {
dfs(j);
if (quiet[ans[j]] < quiet[ans[i]]) {
ans[i] = ans[j];
}
}
};
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
dfs(i);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Repeatedly find a vertex with no incoming edges, remove it and its outgoing edges, and repeat. Finding the zero-in-degree vertex scans all V vertices, and we do this V times. Removing edges touches E edges total. Without an in-degree array, this gives O(V × E).
Build an adjacency list (O(V + E)), then either do Kahn's BFS (process each vertex once + each edge once) or DFS (visit each vertex once + each edge once). Both are O(V + E). Space includes the adjacency list (O(V + E)) plus the in-degree array or visited set (O(V)).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.