Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an array representing a row of seats where seats[i] = 1 represents a person sitting in the ith seat, and seats[i] = 0 represents that the ith seat is empty (0-indexed).
There is at least one empty seat, and at least one person sitting.
Alex wants to sit in the seat such that the distance between him and the closest person to him is maximized.
Return that maximum distance to the closest person.
Example 1:
Input: seats = [1,0,0,0,1,0,1] Output: 2 Explanation: If Alex sits in the second open seat (i.e. seats[2]), then the closest person has distance 2. If Alex sits in any other open seat, the closest person has distance 1. Thus, the maximum distance to the closest person is 2.
Example 2:
Input: seats = [1,0,0,0] Output: 3 Explanation: If Alex sits in the last seat (i.e. seats[3]), the closest person is 3 seats away. This is the maximum distance possible, so the answer is 3.
Example 3:
Input: seats = [0,1] Output: 1
Constraints:
2 <= seats.length <= 2 * 104seats[i] is 0 or 1.Problem summary: You are given an array representing a row of seats where seats[i] = 1 represents a person sitting in the ith seat, and seats[i] = 0 represents that the ith seat is empty (0-indexed). There is at least one empty seat, and at least one person sitting. Alex wants to sit in the seat such that the distance between him and the closest person to him is maximized. Return that maximum distance to the closest person.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[1,0,0,0,1,0,1]
[1,0,0,0]
[0,1]
exam-room)task-scheduler-ii)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #849: Maximize Distance to Closest Person
class Solution {
public int maxDistToClosest(int[] seats) {
int first = -1, last = -1;
int d = 0, n = seats.length;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
if (seats[i] == 1) {
if (last != -1) {
d = Math.max(d, i - last);
}
if (first == -1) {
first = i;
}
last = i;
}
}
return Math.max(d / 2, Math.max(first, n - last - 1));
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #849: Maximize Distance to Closest Person
func maxDistToClosest(seats []int) int {
first, last := -1, -1
d := 0
for i, c := range seats {
if c == 1 {
if last != -1 {
d = max(d, i-last)
}
if first == -1 {
first = i
}
last = i
}
}
return max(d/2, max(first, len(seats)-last-1))
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #849: Maximize Distance to Closest Person
class Solution:
def maxDistToClosest(self, seats: List[int]) -> int:
first = last = None
d = 0
for i, c in enumerate(seats):
if c:
if last is not None:
d = max(d, i - last)
if first is None:
first = i
last = i
return max(first, len(seats) - last - 1, d // 2)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #849: Maximize Distance to Closest Person
struct Solution;
impl Solution {
fn max_dist_to_closest(seats: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let mut first: Option<usize> = None;
let mut last: Option<usize> = None;
let mut prev: Option<usize> = None;
let n = seats.len();
let mut max = 0;
for i in 0..n {
if seats[i] == 1 {
if first.is_none() {
first = Some(i);
}
if let Some(j) = prev {
max = usize::max((i - j) / 2, max);
}
prev = Some(i);
last = Some(i);
}
}
max = usize::max(first.unwrap(), max);
max = usize::max(n - 1 - last.unwrap(), max);
max as i32
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let seats = vec![1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1];
assert_eq!(Solution::max_dist_to_closest(seats), 2);
let seats = vec![1, 0, 0, 0];
assert_eq!(Solution::max_dist_to_closest(seats), 3);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #849: Maximize Distance to Closest Person
function maxDistToClosest(seats: number[]): number {
let first = -1,
last = -1;
let d = 0,
n = seats.length;
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
if (seats[i] === 1) {
if (last !== -1) {
d = Math.max(d, i - last);
}
if (first === -1) {
first = i;
}
last = i;
}
}
return Math.max(first, n - last - 1, d >> 1);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.