Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given a large integer represented as an integer array digits, where each digits[i] is the ith digit of the integer. The digits are ordered from most significant to least significant in left-to-right order. The large integer does not contain any leading 0's.
Increment the large integer by one and return the resulting array of digits.
Example 1:
Input: digits = [1,2,3] Output: [1,2,4] Explanation: The array represents the integer 123. Incrementing by one gives 123 + 1 = 124. Thus, the result should be [1,2,4].
Example 2:
Input: digits = [4,3,2,1] Output: [4,3,2,2] Explanation: The array represents the integer 4321. Incrementing by one gives 4321 + 1 = 4322. Thus, the result should be [4,3,2,2].
Example 3:
Input: digits = [9] Output: [1,0] Explanation: The array represents the integer 9. Incrementing by one gives 9 + 1 = 10. Thus, the result should be [1,0].
Constraints:
1 <= digits.length <= 1000 <= digits[i] <= 9digits does not contain any leading 0's.Problem summary: You are given a large integer represented as an integer array digits, where each digits[i] is the ith digit of the integer. The digits are ordered from most significant to least significant in left-to-right order. The large integer does not contain any leading 0's. Increment the large integer by one and return the resulting array of digits.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Math
[1,2,3]
[4,3,2,1]
[9]
multiply-strings)add-binary)plus-one-linked-list)add-to-array-form-of-integer)minimum-operations-to-reduce-an-integer-to-0)class Solution {
public int[] plusOne(int[] digits) {
for (int i = digits.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (digits[i] < 9) {
digits[i]++;
return digits; // No carry overflow.
}
digits[i] = 0; // Carry to the next digit.
}
// All digits were 9, e.g. 999 + 1 = 1000.
int[] ans = new int[digits.length + 1];
ans[0] = 1;
return ans;
}
}
func plusOne(digits []int) []int {
for i := len(digits) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
if digits[i] < 9 {
digits[i]++
return digits
}
digits[i] = 0
}
ans := make([]int, len(digits)+1)
ans[0] = 1
return ans
}
class Solution:
def plusOne(self, digits: List[int]) -> List[int]:
for i in range(len(digits) - 1, -1, -1):
if digits[i] < 9:
digits[i] += 1
return digits
digits[i] = 0
return [1] + digits
impl Solution {
pub fn plus_one(mut digits: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<i32> {
for i in (0..digits.len()).rev() {
if digits[i] < 9 {
digits[i] += 1;
return digits;
}
digits[i] = 0;
}
let mut ans = vec![0; digits.len() + 1];
ans[0] = 1;
ans
}
}
function plusOne(digits: number[]): number[] {
for (let i = digits.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (digits[i] < 9) {
digits[i]++;
return digits;
}
digits[i] = 0;
}
const ans = Array(digits.length + 1).fill(0);
ans[0] = 1;
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.