Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using core interview patterns strategy.
Table: Employee
+-------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+---------+ | id | int | | name | varchar | | department | varchar | | managerId | int | +-------------+---------+ id is the primary key (column with unique values) for this table. Each row of this table indicates the name of an employee, their department, and the id of their manager. If managerId is null, then the employee does not have a manager. No employee will be the manager of themself.
Write a solution to find managers with at least five direct reports.
Return the result table in any order.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1:
Input: Employee table: +-----+-------+------------+-----------+ | id | name | department | managerId | +-----+-------+------------+-----------+ | 101 | John | A | null | | 102 | Dan | A | 101 | | 103 | James | A | 101 | | 104 | Amy | A | 101 | | 105 | Anne | A | 101 | | 106 | Ron | B | 101 | +-----+-------+------------+-----------+ Output: +------+ | name | +------+ | John | +------+
Problem summary: Table: Employee +-------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+---------+ | id | int | | name | varchar | | department | varchar | | managerId | int | +-------------+---------+ id is the primary key (column with unique values) for this table. Each row of this table indicates the name of an employee, their department, and the id of their manager. If managerId is null, then the employee does not have a manager. No employee will be the manager of themself. Write a solution to find managers with at least five direct reports. Return the result table in any order. The result format is in the following example.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers": {"Employee": ["id", "name", "department", "managerId"]}, "rows": {"Employee": [[101, "John", "A", null],[102, "Dan", "A", 101], [103, "James", "A", 101], [104, "Amy", "A", 101], [105, "Anne", "A", 101], [106, "Ron", "B", 101]]}}Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #570: Managers with at Least 5 Direct Reports
// Auto-generated Java example from py.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #570: Managers with at Least 5 Direct Reports
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def find_managers(employee: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// # Group the employees by managerId and count the number of direct reports
// manager_report_count = (
// employee.groupby("managerId").size().reset_index(name="directReports")
// )
//
// # Filter managers with at least five direct reports
// result = manager_report_count[manager_report_count["directReports"] >= 5]
//
// # Merge with the Employee table to get the names of these managers
// result = result.merge(
// employee[["id", "name"]], left_on="managerId", right_on="id", how="inner"
// )
//
// # Select only the 'name' column and drop the 'id' and 'directReports' columns
// result = result[["name"]]
//
// return result
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #570: Managers with at Least 5 Direct Reports
// Auto-generated Go example from py.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #570: Managers with at Least 5 Direct Reports
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def find_managers(employee: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// # Group the employees by managerId and count the number of direct reports
// manager_report_count = (
// employee.groupby("managerId").size().reset_index(name="directReports")
// )
//
// # Filter managers with at least five direct reports
// result = manager_report_count[manager_report_count["directReports"] >= 5]
//
// # Merge with the Employee table to get the names of these managers
// result = result.merge(
// employee[["id", "name"]], left_on="managerId", right_on="id", how="inner"
// )
//
// # Select only the 'name' column and drop the 'id' and 'directReports' columns
// result = result[["name"]]
//
// return result
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #570: Managers with at Least 5 Direct Reports
import pandas as pd
def find_managers(employee: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
# Group the employees by managerId and count the number of direct reports
manager_report_count = (
employee.groupby("managerId").size().reset_index(name="directReports")
)
# Filter managers with at least five direct reports
result = manager_report_count[manager_report_count["directReports"] >= 5]
# Merge with the Employee table to get the names of these managers
result = result.merge(
employee[["id", "name"]], left_on="managerId", right_on="id", how="inner"
)
# Select only the 'name' column and drop the 'id' and 'directReports' columns
result = result[["name"]]
return result
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #570: Managers with at Least 5 Direct Reports
// Rust example auto-generated from py reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #570: Managers with at Least 5 Direct Reports
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def find_managers(employee: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// # Group the employees by managerId and count the number of direct reports
// manager_report_count = (
// employee.groupby("managerId").size().reset_index(name="directReports")
// )
//
// # Filter managers with at least five direct reports
// result = manager_report_count[manager_report_count["directReports"] >= 5]
//
// # Merge with the Employee table to get the names of these managers
// result = result.merge(
// employee[["id", "name"]], left_on="managerId", right_on="id", how="inner"
// )
//
// # Select only the 'name' column and drop the 'id' and 'directReports' columns
// result = result[["name"]]
//
// return result
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #570: Managers with at Least 5 Direct Reports
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from py.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #570: Managers with at Least 5 Direct Reports
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def find_managers(employee: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// # Group the employees by managerId and count the number of direct reports
// manager_report_count = (
// employee.groupby("managerId").size().reset_index(name="directReports")
// )
//
// # Filter managers with at least five direct reports
// result = manager_report_count[manager_report_count["directReports"] >= 5]
//
// # Merge with the Employee table to get the names of these managers
// result = result.merge(
// employee[["id", "name"]], left_on="managerId", right_on="id", how="inner"
// )
//
// # Select only the 'name' column and drop the 'id' and 'directReports' columns
// result = result[["name"]]
//
// return result
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.