Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an integer array nums and an integer target.
You want to build an expression out of nums by adding one of the symbols '+' and '-' before each integer in nums and then concatenate all the integers.
nums = [2, 1], you can add a '+' before 2 and a '-' before 1 and concatenate them to build the expression "+2-1".Return the number of different expressions that you can build, which evaluates to target.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,1,1,1,1], target = 3 Output: 5 Explanation: There are 5 ways to assign symbols to make the sum of nums be target 3. -1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 +1 - 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 +1 + 1 - 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 +1 + 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 = 3 +1 + 1 + 1 + 1 - 1 = 3
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1], target = 1 Output: 1
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 200 <= nums[i] <= 10000 <= sum(nums[i]) <= 1000-1000 <= target <= 1000Problem summary: You are given an integer array nums and an integer target. You want to build an expression out of nums by adding one of the symbols '+' and '-' before each integer in nums and then concatenate all the integers. For example, if nums = [2, 1], you can add a '+' before 2 and a '-' before 1 and concatenate them to build the expression "+2-1". Return the number of different expressions that you can build, which evaluates to target.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Dynamic Programming · Backtracking
[1,1,1,1,1] 3
[1] 1
expression-add-operators)ways-to-express-an-integer-as-sum-of-powers)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #494: Target Sum
class Solution {
public int findTargetSumWays(int[] nums, int target) {
int s = Arrays.stream(nums).sum();
if (s < target || (s - target) % 2 != 0) {
return 0;
}
int m = nums.length;
int n = (s - target) / 2;
int[][] f = new int[m + 1][n + 1];
f[0][0] = 1;
for (int i = 1; i <= m; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j <= n; ++j) {
f[i][j] = f[i - 1][j];
if (j >= nums[i - 1]) {
f[i][j] += f[i - 1][j - nums[i - 1]];
}
}
}
return f[m][n];
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #494: Target Sum
func findTargetSumWays(nums []int, target int) int {
s := 0
for _, x := range nums {
s += x
}
if s < target || (s-target)%2 != 0 {
return 0
}
m, n := len(nums), (s-target)/2
f := make([][]int, m+1)
for i := range f {
f[i] = make([]int, n+1)
}
f[0][0] = 1
for i := 1; i <= m; i++ {
for j := 0; j <= n; j++ {
f[i][j] = f[i-1][j]
if j >= nums[i-1] {
f[i][j] += f[i-1][j-nums[i-1]]
}
}
}
return f[m][n]
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #494: Target Sum
class Solution:
def findTargetSumWays(self, nums: List[int], target: int) -> int:
s = sum(nums)
if s < target or (s - target) % 2:
return 0
m, n = len(nums), (s - target) // 2
f = [[0] * (n + 1) for _ in range(m + 1)]
f[0][0] = 1
for i, x in enumerate(nums, 1):
for j in range(n + 1):
f[i][j] = f[i - 1][j]
if j >= x:
f[i][j] += f[i - 1][j - x]
return f[m][n]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #494: Target Sum
impl Solution {
pub fn find_target_sum_ways(nums: Vec<i32>, target: i32) -> i32 {
let s: i32 = nums.iter().sum();
if s < target || (s - target) % 2 != 0 {
return 0;
}
let m = nums.len();
let n = ((s - target) / 2) as usize;
let mut f = vec![vec![0; n + 1]; m + 1];
f[0][0] = 1;
for i in 1..=m {
for j in 0..=n {
f[i][j] = f[i - 1][j];
if j as i32 >= nums[i - 1] {
f[i][j] += f[i - 1][j - nums[i - 1] as usize];
}
}
}
f[m][n]
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #494: Target Sum
function findTargetSumWays(nums: number[], target: number): number {
const s = nums.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
if (s < target || (s - target) % 2) {
return 0;
}
const [m, n] = [nums.length, ((s - target) / 2) | 0];
const f: number[][] = Array.from({ length: m + 1 }, () => Array(n + 1).fill(0));
f[0][0] = 1;
for (let i = 1; i <= m; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j <= n; j++) {
f[i][j] = f[i - 1][j];
if (j >= nums[i - 1]) {
f[i][j] += f[i - 1][j - nums[i - 1]];
}
}
}
return f[m][n];
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.
Wrong move: Mutable state leaks between branches.
Usually fails on: Later branches inherit selections from earlier branches.
Fix: Always revert state changes immediately after recursive call.