Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
Given an array of strings words (without duplicates), return all the concatenated words in the given list of words.
A concatenated word is defined as a string that is comprised entirely of at least two shorter words (not necessarily distinct) in the given array.
Example 1:
Input: words = ["cat","cats","catsdogcats","dog","dogcatsdog","hippopotamuses","rat","ratcatdogcat"] Output: ["catsdogcats","dogcatsdog","ratcatdogcat"] Explanation: "catsdogcats" can be concatenated by "cats", "dog" and "cats"; "dogcatsdog" can be concatenated by "dog", "cats" and "dog"; "ratcatdogcat" can be concatenated by "rat", "cat", "dog" and "cat".
Example 2:
Input: words = ["cat","dog","catdog"] Output: ["catdog"]
Constraints:
1 <= words.length <= 1041 <= words[i].length <= 30words[i] consists of only lowercase English letters.words are unique.1 <= sum(words[i].length) <= 105Problem summary: Given an array of strings words (without duplicates), return all the concatenated words in the given list of words. A concatenated word is defined as a string that is comprised entirely of at least two shorter words (not necessarily distinct) in the given array.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Dynamic Programming · Trie
["cat","cats","catsdogcats","dog","dogcatsdog","hippopotamuses","rat","ratcatdogcat"]
["cat","dog","catdog"]
word-break-ii)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #472: Concatenated Words
class Trie {
Trie[] children = new Trie[26];
boolean isEnd;
void insert(String w) {
Trie node = this;
for (char c : w.toCharArray()) {
c -= 'a';
if (node.children[c] == null) {
node.children[c] = new Trie();
}
node = node.children[c];
}
node.isEnd = true;
}
}
class Solution {
private Trie trie = new Trie();
public List<String> findAllConcatenatedWordsInADict(String[] words) {
Arrays.sort(words, (a, b) -> a.length() - b.length());
List<String> ans = new ArrayList<>();
for (String w : words) {
if (dfs(w)) {
ans.add(w);
} else {
trie.insert(w);
}
}
return ans;
}
private boolean dfs(String w) {
if ("".equals(w)) {
return true;
}
Trie node = trie;
for (int i = 0; i < w.length(); ++i) {
int idx = w.charAt(i) - 'a';
if (node.children[idx] == null) {
return false;
}
node = node.children[idx];
if (node.isEnd && dfs(w.substring(i + 1))) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #472: Concatenated Words
type Trie struct {
children [26]*Trie
isEnd bool
}
func newTrie() *Trie {
return &Trie{}
}
func (this *Trie) insert(word string) {
node := this
for _, c := range word {
c -= 'a'
if node.children[c] == nil {
node.children[c] = newTrie()
}
node = node.children[c]
}
node.isEnd = true
}
func findAllConcatenatedWordsInADict(words []string) (ans []string) {
sort.Slice(words, func(i, j int) bool { return len(words[i]) < len(words[j]) })
trie := newTrie()
var dfs func(string) bool
dfs = func(w string) bool {
if w == "" {
return true
}
node := trie
for i, c := range w {
c -= 'a'
if node.children[c] == nil {
return false
}
node = node.children[c]
if node.isEnd && dfs(w[i+1:]) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
for _, w := range words {
if dfs(w) {
ans = append(ans, w)
} else {
trie.insert(w)
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #472: Concatenated Words
class Trie:
def __init__(self):
self.children = [None] * 26
self.is_end = False
def insert(self, w):
node = self
for c in w:
idx = ord(c) - ord('a')
if node.children[idx] is None:
node.children[idx] = Trie()
node = node.children[idx]
node.is_end = True
class Solution:
def findAllConcatenatedWordsInADict(self, words: List[str]) -> List[str]:
def dfs(w):
if not w:
return True
node = trie
for i, c in enumerate(w):
idx = ord(c) - ord('a')
if node.children[idx] is None:
return False
node = node.children[idx]
if node.is_end and dfs(w[i + 1 :]):
return True
return False
trie = Trie()
ans = []
words.sort(key=lambda x: len(x))
for w in words:
if dfs(w):
ans.append(w)
else:
trie.insert(w)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #472: Concatenated Words
use std::collections::HashSet;
use std::iter::FromIterator;
impl Solution {
pub fn find_all_concatenated_words_in_a_dict(words: Vec<String>) -> Vec<String> {
let word_set: HashSet<String> = HashSet::from_iter(words.iter().cloned());
let mut res = vec![];
for w in words {
if Self::dfs(&w, &word_set) {
res.push(w);
}
}
res
}
pub fn dfs(word: &str, word_set: &HashSet<String>) -> bool {
for i in 1..word.len() {
let (prefix, suffix) = (&word[..i], &word[i..]);
if (word_set.contains(prefix) && word_set.contains(suffix))
|| (word_set.contains(prefix) && Self::dfs(suffix, word_set))
{
return true;
}
}
false
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #472: Concatenated Words
function findAllConcatenatedWordsInADict(words: string[]): string[] {
let wordSet = new Set(words);
let res: string[] = [];
for (let w of words) {
if (dfs(w)) {
res.push(w);
}
}
return res;
function dfs(word: string): boolean {
for (let i = 1; i < word.length; i++) {
let prefix = word.slice(0, i);
let suffix = word.slice(i);
if (
(wordSet.has(prefix) && wordSet.has(suffix)) ||
(wordSet.has(prefix) && dfs(suffix))
) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.