Overflow in intermediate arithmetic
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on math fundamentals.
Given two non-negative integers, num1 and num2 represented as string, return the sum of num1 and num2 as a string.
You must solve the problem without using any built-in library for handling large integers (such as BigInteger). You must also not convert the inputs to integers directly.
Example 1:
Input: num1 = "11", num2 = "123" Output: "134"
Example 2:
Input: num1 = "456", num2 = "77" Output: "533"
Example 3:
Input: num1 = "0", num2 = "0" Output: "0"
Constraints:
1 <= num1.length, num2.length <= 104num1 and num2 consist of only digits.num1 and num2 don't have any leading zeros except for the zero itself.Problem summary: Given two non-negative integers, num1 and num2 represented as string, return the sum of num1 and num2 as a string. You must solve the problem without using any built-in library for handling large integers (such as BigInteger). You must also not convert the inputs to integers directly.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Math
"11" "123"
"456" "77"
"0" "0"
add-two-numbers)multiply-strings)add-to-array-form-of-integer)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #415: Add Strings
class Solution {
public String addStrings(String num1, String num2) {
int i = num1.length() - 1, j = num2.length() - 1;
StringBuilder ans = new StringBuilder();
for (int c = 0; i >= 0 || j >= 0 || c > 0; --i, --j) {
int a = i < 0 ? 0 : num1.charAt(i) - '0';
int b = j < 0 ? 0 : num2.charAt(j) - '0';
c += a + b;
ans.append(c % 10);
c /= 10;
}
return ans.reverse().toString();
}
public String subStrings(String num1, String num2) {
int m = num1.length(), n = num2.length();
boolean neg = m < n || (m == n && num1.compareTo(num2) < 0);
if (neg) {
String t = num1;
num1 = num2;
num2 = t;
}
int i = num1.length() - 1, j = num2.length() - 1;
StringBuilder ans = new StringBuilder();
for (int c = 0; i >= 0; --i, --j) {
c = (num1.charAt(i) - '0') - c - (j < 0 ? 0 : num2.charAt(j) - '0');
ans.append((c + 10) % 10);
c = c < 0 ? 1 : 0;
}
while (ans.length() > 1 && ans.charAt(ans.length() - 1) == '0') {
ans.deleteCharAt(ans.length() - 1);
}
if (neg) {
ans.append('-');
}
return ans.reverse().toString();
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #415: Add Strings
func addStrings(num1 string, num2 string) string {
i, j := len(num1)-1, len(num2)-1
ans := []byte{}
for c := 0; i >= 0 || j >= 0 || c > 0; i, j = i-1, j-1 {
if i >= 0 {
c += int(num1[i] - '0')
}
if j >= 0 {
c += int(num2[j] - '0')
}
ans = append(ans, byte(c%10+'0'))
c /= 10
}
for i, j := 0, len(ans)-1; i < j; i, j = i+1, j-1 {
ans[i], ans[j] = ans[j], ans[i]
}
return string(ans)
}
func subStrings(num1 string, num2 string) string {
m, n := len(num1), len(num2)
neg := m < n || (m == n && num1 < num2)
if neg {
num1, num2 = num2, num1
}
i, j := len(num1)-1, len(num2)-1
ans := []byte{}
for c := 0; i >= 0; i, j = i-1, j-1 {
c = int(num1[i]-'0') - c
if j >= 0 {
c -= int(num2[j] - '0')
}
ans = append(ans, byte((c+10)%10+'0'))
if c < 0 {
c = 1
} else {
c = 0
}
}
for len(ans) > 1 && ans[len(ans)-1] == '0' {
ans = ans[:len(ans)-1]
}
if neg {
ans = append(ans, '-')
}
for i, j := 0, len(ans)-1; i < j; i, j = i+1, j-1 {
ans[i], ans[j] = ans[j], ans[i]
}
return string(ans)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #415: Add Strings
class Solution:
def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str:
i, j = len(num1) - 1, len(num2) - 1
ans = []
c = 0
while i >= 0 or j >= 0 or c:
a = 0 if i < 0 else int(num1[i])
b = 0 if j < 0 else int(num2[j])
c, v = divmod(a + b + c, 10)
ans.append(str(v))
i, j = i - 1, j - 1
return "".join(ans[::-1])
def subStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str:
m, n = len(num1), len(num2)
neg = m < n or (m == n and num1 < num2)
if neg:
num1, num2 = num2, num1
i, j = len(num1) - 1, len(num2) - 1
ans = []
c = 0
while i >= 0:
c = int(num1[i]) - c - (0 if j < 0 else int(num2[j]))
ans.append(str((c + 10) % 10))
c = 1 if c < 0 else 0
i, j = i - 1, j - 1
while len(ans) > 1 and ans[-1] == '0':
ans.pop()
if neg:
ans.append('-')
return ''.join(ans[::-1])
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #415: Add Strings
impl Solution {
pub fn add_strings(num1: String, num2: String) -> String {
let mut res = vec![];
let s1 = num1.as_bytes();
let s2 = num2.as_bytes();
let (mut i, mut j) = (s1.len(), s2.len());
let mut is_over = false;
while i != 0 || j != 0 || is_over {
let mut sum = if is_over { 1 } else { 0 };
if i != 0 {
sum += (s1[i - 1] - b'0') as i32;
i -= 1;
}
if j != 0 {
sum += (s2[j - 1] - b'0') as i32;
j -= 1;
}
is_over = sum >= 10;
res.push((sum % 10).to_string());
}
res.into_iter().rev().collect()
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #415: Add Strings
function addStrings(num1: string, num2: string): string {
let i = num1.length - 1;
let j = num2.length - 1;
const ans: number[] = [];
for (let c = 0; i >= 0 || j >= 0 || c; --i, --j) {
c += i < 0 ? 0 : +num1[i];
c += j < 0 ? 0 : +num2[j];
ans.push(c % 10);
c = Math.floor(c / 10);
}
return ans.reverse().join('');
}
function subStrings(num1: string, num2: string): string {
const m = num1.length;
const n = num2.length;
const neg = m < n || (m == n && num1 < num2);
if (neg) {
const t = num1;
num1 = num2;
num2 = t;
}
let i = num1.length - 1;
let j = num2.length - 1;
const ans: number[] = [];
for (let c = 0; i >= 0; --i, --j) {
c = +num1[i] - c;
if (j >= 0) {
c -= +num2[j];
}
ans.push((c + 10) % 10);
c = c < 0 ? 1 : 0;
}
while (ans.length > 1 && ans.at(-1) === 0) {
ans.pop();
}
return (neg ? '-' : '') + ans.reverse().join('');
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Simulate the process step by step — multiply n times, check each number up to n, or iterate through all possibilities. Each step is O(1), but doing it n times gives O(n). No extra space needed since we just track running state.
Math problems often have a closed-form or O(log n) solution hidden behind an O(n) simulation. Modular arithmetic, fast exponentiation (repeated squaring), GCD (Euclidean algorithm), and number theory properties can dramatically reduce complexity.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.