Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an array of people, people, which are the attributes of some people in a queue (not necessarily in order). Each people[i] = [hi, ki] represents the ith person of height hi with exactly ki other people in front who have a height greater than or equal to hi.
Reconstruct and return the queue that is represented by the input array people. The returned queue should be formatted as an array queue, where queue[j] = [hj, kj] is the attributes of the jth person in the queue (queue[0] is the person at the front of the queue).
Example 1:
Input: people = [[7,0],[4,4],[7,1],[5,0],[6,1],[5,2]] Output: [[5,0],[7,0],[5,2],[6,1],[4,4],[7,1]] Explanation: Person 0 has height 5 with no other people taller or the same height in front. Person 1 has height 7 with no other people taller or the same height in front. Person 2 has height 5 with two persons taller or the same height in front, which is person 0 and 1. Person 3 has height 6 with one person taller or the same height in front, which is person 1. Person 4 has height 4 with four people taller or the same height in front, which are people 0, 1, 2, and 3. Person 5 has height 7 with one person taller or the same height in front, which is person 1. Hence [[5,0],[7,0],[5,2],[6,1],[4,4],[7,1]] is the reconstructed queue.
Example 2:
Input: people = [[6,0],[5,0],[4,0],[3,2],[2,2],[1,4]] Output: [[4,0],[5,0],[2,2],[3,2],[1,4],[6,0]]
Constraints:
1 <= people.length <= 20000 <= hi <= 1060 <= ki < people.lengthProblem summary: You are given an array of people, people, which are the attributes of some people in a queue (not necessarily in order). Each people[i] = [hi, ki] represents the ith person of height hi with exactly ki other people in front who have a height greater than or equal to hi. Reconstruct and return the queue that is represented by the input array people. The returned queue should be formatted as an array queue, where queue[j] = [hj, kj] is the attributes of the jth person in the queue (queue[0] is the person at the front of the queue).
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Segment Tree
[[7,0],[4,4],[7,1],[5,0],[6,1],[5,2]]
[[6,0],[5,0],[4,0],[3,2],[2,2],[1,4]]
count-of-smaller-numbers-after-self)reward-top-k-students)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #406: Queue Reconstruction by Height
class Solution {
public int[][] reconstructQueue(int[][] people) {
Arrays.sort(people, (a, b) -> a[0] == b[0] ? a[1] - b[1] : b[0] - a[0]);
List<int[]> ans = new ArrayList<>(people.length);
for (int[] p : people) {
ans.add(p[1], p);
}
return ans.toArray(new int[ans.size()][]);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #406: Queue Reconstruction by Height
func reconstructQueue(people [][]int) [][]int {
sort.Slice(people, func(i, j int) bool {
a, b := people[i], people[j]
return a[0] > b[0] || a[0] == b[0] && a[1] < b[1]
})
var ans [][]int
for _, p := range people {
i := p[1]
ans = append(ans[:i], append([][]int{p}, ans[i:]...)...)
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #406: Queue Reconstruction by Height
class Solution:
def reconstructQueue(self, people: List[List[int]]) -> List[List[int]]:
people.sort(key=lambda x: (-x[0], x[1]))
ans = []
for p in people:
ans.insert(p[1], p)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #406: Queue Reconstruction by Height
struct Solution;
use std::cmp::Reverse;
type People = (Reverse<i32>, i32);
impl Solution {
fn reconstruct_queue(people: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> Vec<Vec<i32>> {
let mut people: Vec<People> = people.iter().map(|v| (Reverse(v[0]), v[1])).collect();
people.sort_unstable();
let mut res = vec![];
for p in people {
res.insert(p.1 as usize, vec![(p.0).0, p.1]);
}
res
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let people = vec_vec_i32![[7, 0], [4, 4], [7, 1], [5, 0], [6, 1], [5, 2]];
let res = vec![[5, 0], [7, 0], [5, 2], [6, 1], [4, 4], [7, 1]];
assert_eq!(Solution::reconstruct_queue(people), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #406: Queue Reconstruction by Height
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #406: Queue Reconstruction by Height
// class Solution {
// public int[][] reconstructQueue(int[][] people) {
// Arrays.sort(people, (a, b) -> a[0] == b[0] ? a[1] - b[1] : b[0] - a[0]);
// List<int[]> ans = new ArrayList<>(people.length);
// for (int[] p : people) {
// ans.add(p[1], p);
// }
// return ans.toArray(new int[ans.size()][]);
// }
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
For each of q queries, scan the entire range to compute the aggregate (sum, min, max). Each range scan takes up to O(n) for a full-array query. With q queries: O(n × q) total. Point updates are O(1) but queries dominate.
Building the tree is O(n). Each query or update traverses O(log n) nodes (tree height). For q queries: O(n + q log n) total. Space is O(4n) ≈ O(n) for the tree array. Lazy propagation adds O(1) per node for deferred updates.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.