Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using core interview patterns strategy.
You are given an integer array nums, where nums[i] represents the points scored in the ith game.
There are exactly two players. Initially, the first player is active and the second player is inactive.
The following rules apply sequentially for each game i:
nums[i] is odd, the active and inactive players swap roles.5, 11, 17, ...), the active and inactive players swap roles.ith game and gains nums[i] points.Return the score difference, defined as the first player's total score minus the second player's total score.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,3]
Output: 0
Explanation:
nums[0] = 1 point.nums[1] = 2 points.nums[2] = 3 points.3 - 3 = 0.Example 2:
Input: nums = [2,4,2,1,2,1]
Output: 4
Explanation:
2 + 4 + 2 = 8 points.nums[3] = 1 point.nums[4] = 2 points.nums[5] = 1 point.8 - 4 = 4.Example 3:
Input: nums = [1]
Output: -1
Explanation:
nums[0] = 1 point.0 - 1 = -1.Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 10001 <= nums[i] <= 1000Problem summary: You are given an integer array nums, where nums[i] represents the points scored in the ith game. There are exactly two players. Initially, the first player is active and the second player is inactive. The following rules apply sequentially for each game i: If nums[i] is odd, the active and inactive players swap roles. In every 6th game (that is, game indices 5, 11, 17, ...), the active and inactive players swap roles. The active player plays the ith game and gains nums[i] points. Return the score difference, defined as the first player's total score minus the second player's total score.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
[1,2,3]
[2,4,2,1,2,1]
[1]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3847: Find the Score Difference in a Game
class Solution {
public int scoreDifference(int[] nums) {
int ans = 0;
int k = 1;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; ++i) {
int x = nums[i];
if ((x & 1) == 1) {
k = -k;
}
if (i % 6 == 5) {
k = -k;
}
ans += k * x;
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3847: Find the Score Difference in a Game
func scoreDifference(nums []int) int {
ans := 0
k := 1
for i, x := range nums {
if x%2 != 0 {
k = -k
}
if i%6 == 5 {
k = -k
}
ans += k * x
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3847: Find the Score Difference in a Game
class Solution:
def scoreDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
ans, k = 0, 1
for i, x in enumerate(nums):
if x % 2:
k *= -1
if i % 6 == 5:
k *= -1
ans += k * x
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3847: Find the Score Difference in a Game
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3847: Find the Score Difference in a Game
// class Solution {
// public int scoreDifference(int[] nums) {
// int ans = 0;
// int k = 1;
// for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; ++i) {
// int x = nums[i];
// if ((x & 1) == 1) {
// k = -k;
// }
// if (i % 6 == 5) {
// k = -k;
// }
// ans += k * x;
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3847: Find the Score Difference in a Game
function scoreDifference(nums: number[]): number {
let ans = 0;
let k = 1;
nums.forEach((x, i) => {
if (x % 2 !== 0) {
k = -k;
}
if (i % 6 === 5) {
k = -k;
}
ans += k * x;
});
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.