Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an integer n, a 2D integer array restrictions, and an integer array diff of length n - 1. Your task is to construct a sequence of length n, denoted by a[0], a[1], ..., a[n - 1], such that it satisfies the following conditions:
a[0] is 0.i (0 <= i <= n - 2), abs(a[i] - a[i + 1]) <= diff[i].restrictions[i] = [idx, maxVal], the value at position idx in the sequence must not exceed maxVal (i.e., a[idx] <= maxVal).Your goal is to construct a valid sequence that maximizes the largest value within the sequence while satisfying all the above conditions.
Return an integer denoting the largest value present in such an optimal sequence.
Example 1:
Input: n = 10, restrictions = [[3,1],[8,1]], diff = [2,2,3,1,4,5,1,1,2]
Output: 6
Explanation:
a = [0, 2, 4, 1, 2, 6, 2, 1, 1, 3] satisfies the given constraints (a[3] <= 1 and a[8] <= 1).Example 2:
Input: n = 8, restrictions = [[3,2]], diff = [3,5,2,4,2,3,1]
Output: 12
Explanation:
a = [0, 3, 3, 2, 6, 8, 11, 12] satisfies the given constraints (a[3] <= 2).Constraints:
2 <= n <= 1051 <= restrictions.length <= n - 1restrictions[i].length == 2restrictions[i] = [idx, maxVal]1 <= idx < n1 <= maxVal <= 106diff.length == n - 11 <= diff[i] <= 10restrictions[i][0] are unique.Problem summary: You are given an integer n, a 2D integer array restrictions, and an integer array diff of length n - 1. Your task is to construct a sequence of length n, denoted by a[0], a[1], ..., a[n - 1], such that it satisfies the following conditions: a[0] is 0. All elements in the sequence are non-negative. For every index i (0 <= i <= n - 2), abs(a[i] - a[i + 1]) <= diff[i]. For each restrictions[i] = [idx, maxVal], the value at position idx in the sequence must not exceed maxVal (i.e., a[idx] <= maxVal). Your goal is to construct a valid sequence that maximizes the largest value within the sequence while satisfying all the above conditions. Return an integer denoting the largest value present in such an optimal sequence.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Greedy
10 [[3,1],[8,1]] [2,2,3,1,4,5,1,1,2]
8 [[3,2]] [3,5,2,4,2,3,1]
maximum-building-height)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3796: Find Maximum Value in a Constrained Sequence
// Auto-generated Java example from go.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (go):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3796: Find Maximum Value in a Constrained Sequence
// package main
//
// import (
// "math"
// "slices"
// )
//
// // https://space.bilibili.com/206214
// func findMaxVal(n int, restrictions [][]int, diff []int) int {
// maxVal := make([]int, n)
// for i := range maxVal {
// maxVal[i] = math.MaxInt
// }
// for _, r := range restrictions {
// maxVal[r[0]] = r[1]
// }
//
// a := make([]int, n)
// for i, d := range diff {
// a[i+1] = min(a[i]+d, maxVal[i+1])
// }
// for i := n - 2; i > 0; i-- {
// a[i] = min(a[i], a[i+1]+diff[i])
// }
// return slices.Max(a)
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3796: Find Maximum Value in a Constrained Sequence
package main
import (
"math"
"slices"
)
// https://space.bilibili.com/206214
func findMaxVal(n int, restrictions [][]int, diff []int) int {
maxVal := make([]int, n)
for i := range maxVal {
maxVal[i] = math.MaxInt
}
for _, r := range restrictions {
maxVal[r[0]] = r[1]
}
a := make([]int, n)
for i, d := range diff {
a[i+1] = min(a[i]+d, maxVal[i+1])
}
for i := n - 2; i > 0; i-- {
a[i] = min(a[i], a[i+1]+diff[i])
}
return slices.Max(a)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3796: Find Maximum Value in a Constrained Sequence
# Time: O(n)
# Space: O(n)
# greedy, dp
class Solution(object):
def findMaxVal(self, n, restrictions, diff):
"""
:type n: int
:type restrictions: List[List[int]]
:type diff: List[int]
:rtype: int
"""
dp = [float("inf")]*n
dp[0] = 0
for i, x in restrictions:
dp[i] = x
for i in xrange(n-1):
dp[i+1] = min(dp[i+1], dp[i]+diff[i])
for i in reversed(xrange(n-1)):
dp[i] = min(dp[i], dp[i+1]+diff[i])
return max(dp)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3796: Find Maximum Value in a Constrained Sequence
// Rust example auto-generated from go reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (go):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3796: Find Maximum Value in a Constrained Sequence
// package main
//
// import (
// "math"
// "slices"
// )
//
// // https://space.bilibili.com/206214
// func findMaxVal(n int, restrictions [][]int, diff []int) int {
// maxVal := make([]int, n)
// for i := range maxVal {
// maxVal[i] = math.MaxInt
// }
// for _, r := range restrictions {
// maxVal[r[0]] = r[1]
// }
//
// a := make([]int, n)
// for i, d := range diff {
// a[i+1] = min(a[i]+d, maxVal[i+1])
// }
// for i := n - 2; i > 0; i-- {
// a[i] = min(a[i], a[i+1]+diff[i])
// }
// return slices.Max(a)
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3796: Find Maximum Value in a Constrained Sequence
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from go.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (go):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3796: Find Maximum Value in a Constrained Sequence
// package main
//
// import (
// "math"
// "slices"
// )
//
// // https://space.bilibili.com/206214
// func findMaxVal(n int, restrictions [][]int, diff []int) int {
// maxVal := make([]int, n)
// for i := range maxVal {
// maxVal[i] = math.MaxInt
// }
// for _, r := range restrictions {
// maxVal[r[0]] = r[1]
// }
//
// a := make([]int, n)
// for i, d := range diff {
// a[i+1] = min(a[i]+d, maxVal[i+1])
// }
// for i := n - 2; i > 0; i-- {
// a[i] = min(a[i], a[i+1]+diff[i])
// }
// return slices.Max(a)
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Try every possible combination of choices. With n items each having two states (include/exclude), the search space is 2ⁿ. Evaluating each combination takes O(n), giving O(n × 2ⁿ). The recursion stack or subset storage uses O(n) space.
Greedy algorithms typically sort the input (O(n log n)) then make a single pass (O(n)). The sort dominates. If the input is already sorted or the greedy choice can be computed without sorting, time drops to O(n). Proving greedy correctness (exchange argument) is harder than the implementation.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.
Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.
Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.