LeetCode #3779 — MEDIUM

Minimum Number of Operations to Have Distinct Elements

Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.

The Problem

Problem Statement

You are given an integer array nums.

In one operation, you remove the first three elements of the current array. If there are fewer than three elements remaining, all remaining elements are removed.

Repeat this operation until the array is empty or contains no duplicate values.

Return an integer denoting the number of operations required.

Example 1:

Input: nums = [3,8,3,6,5,8]

Output: 1

Explanation:

In the first operation, we remove the first three elements. The remaining elements [6, 5, 8] are all distinct, so we stop. Only one operation is needed.

Example 2:

Input: nums = [2,2]

Output: 1

Explanation:

After one operation, the array becomes empty, which meets the stopping condition.

Example 3:

Input: nums = [4,3,5,1,2]

Output: 0

Explanation:

All elements in the array are distinct, therefore no operations are needed.

Constraints:

1 <= nums.length <= 10⁵
1 <= nums[i] <= 10⁵

Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: You are given an integer array nums. In one operation, you remove the first three elements of the current array. If there are fewer than three elements remaining, all remaining elements are removed. Repeat this operation until the array is empty or contains no duplicate values. Return an integer denoting the number of operations required.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map

Example 1

[3,8,3,6,5,8]

Example 2

[2,2]

Example 3

[4,3,5,1,2]

Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

Simulate the operations as described using a map that is initially filled.
While the map does not contain all distinct elements, delete the first three values using a pointer.
Repeat until the map contains all distinct elements or becomes empty.

Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.

Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
Record answer candidate when condition is met.
Continue until all input is consumed.

Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.

Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input

Single element / shortest valid input

Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.

Duplicates & Repeats

Repeated values / repeated states

Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.

Extreme Constraints

Upper-end input sizes

Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.

Invalid / Corner Shape

Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures

Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.

Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3779: Minimum Number of Operations to Have Distinct Elements
class Solution {
    public int minOperations(int[] nums) {
        Set<Integer> st = new HashSet<>();
        for (int i = nums.length - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
            if (!st.add(nums[i])) {
                return i / 3 + 1;
            }
        }
        return 0;
    }
}

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3779: Minimum Number of Operations to Have Distinct Elements
func minOperations(nums []int) int {
	st := make(map[int]struct{})
	for i := len(nums) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
		if _, ok := st[nums[i]]; ok {
			return i/3 + 1
		}
		st[nums[i]] = struct{}{}
	}
	return 0
}

# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3779: Minimum Number of Operations to Have Distinct Elements
class Solution:
    def minOperations(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
        st = set()
        for i in range(len(nums) - 1, -1, -1):
            if nums[i] in st:
                return i // 3 + 1
            st.add(nums[i])
        return 0

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3779: Minimum Number of Operations to Have Distinct Elements
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
    pub fn rust_example() {
        // Port the logic from the reference block below.
    }
}

// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3779: Minimum Number of Operations to Have Distinct Elements
// class Solution {
//     public int minOperations(int[] nums) {
//         Set<Integer> st = new HashSet<>();
//         for (int i = nums.length - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
//             if (!st.add(nums[i])) {
//                 return i / 3 + 1;
//             }
//         }
//         return 0;
//     }
// }

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3779: Minimum Number of Operations to Have Distinct Elements
function minOperations(nums: number[]): number {
    const st = new Set<number>();
    for (let i = nums.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        if (st.has(nums[i])) {
            return Math.floor(i / 3) + 1;
        }
        st.add(nums[i]);
    }
    return 0;
}

Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Custom checkpoints (one per line)

Press Step or Run All to begin.

Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time

O(n)

Space

O(n)

Approach Breakdown

BRUTE FORCE

O(n²) time

O(1) space

Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.

OPTIMIZED

O(n) time

O(1) space

Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.

Shortcut: If you are using nested loops on an array, there is almost always an O(n) solution. Look for the right auxiliary state.

Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Off-by-one on range boundaries

Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.

Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.

Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.

Mutating counts without cleanup

Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.

Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.

Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.