Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an m x n grid where each cell contains one of the values 0, 1, or 2. You are also given an integer k.
You start from the top-left corner (0, 0) and want to reach the bottom-right corner (m - 1, n - 1) by moving only right or down.
Each cell contributes a specific score and incurs an associated cost, according to their cell values:
Return the maximum score achievable without exceeding a total cost of k, or -1 if no valid path exists.
Note: If you reach the last cell but the total cost exceeds k, the path is invalid.
Example 1:
Input: grid = [[0, 1],[2, 0]], k = 1
Output: 2
Explanation:
The optimal path is:
| Cell | grid[i][j] | Score | Total Score |
Cost | Total Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (0, 0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| (1, 0) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| (1, 1) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Thus, the maximum possible score is 2.
Example 2:
Input: grid = [[0, 1],[1, 2]], k = 1
Output: -1
Explanation:
There is no path that reaches cell (1, 1) without exceeding cost k. Thus, the answer is -1.
Constraints:
1 <= m, n <= 2000 <= k <= 103grid[0][0] == 00 <= grid[i][j] <= 2Problem summary: You are given an m x n grid where each cell contains one of the values 0, 1, or 2. You are also given an integer k. You start from the top-left corner (0, 0) and want to reach the bottom-right corner (m - 1, n - 1) by moving only right or down. Each cell contributes a specific score and incurs an associated cost, according to their cell values: 0: adds 0 to your score and costs 0. 1: adds 1 to your score and costs 1. 2: adds 2 to your score and costs 1. Return the maximum score achievable without exceeding a total cost of k, or -1 if no valid path exists. Note: If you reach the last cell but the total cost exceeds k, the path is invalid.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Dynamic Programming
[[0, 1],[2, 0]] 1
[[0, 1],[1, 2]] 1
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3742: Maximum Path Score in a Grid
class Solution {
private int[][] grid;
private Integer[][][] f;
private final int inf = 1 << 30;
public int maxPathScore(int[][] grid, int k) {
this.grid = grid;
int m = grid.length;
int n = grid[0].length;
f = new Integer[m][n][k + 1];
int ans = dfs(m - 1, n - 1, k);
return ans < 0 ? -1 : ans;
}
private int dfs(int i, int j, int k) {
if (i < 0 || j < 0 || k < 0) {
return -inf;
}
if (i == 0 && j == 0) {
return 0;
}
if (f[i][j][k] != null) {
return f[i][j][k];
}
int res = grid[i][j];
int nk = k;
if (grid[i][j] > 0) {
--nk;
}
int a = dfs(i - 1, j, nk);
int b = dfs(i, j - 1, nk);
res += Math.max(a, b);
f[i][j][k] = res;
return res;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3742: Maximum Path Score in a Grid
func maxPathScore(grid [][]int, k int) int {
m := len(grid)
n := len(grid[0])
inf := 1 << 30
f := make([][][]int, m)
for i := 0; i < m; i++ {
f[i] = make([][]int, n)
for j := 0; j < n; j++ {
f[i][j] = make([]int, k+1)
for t := 0; t <= k; t++ {
f[i][j][t] = -1
}
}
}
var dfs func(i, j, k int) int
dfs = func(i, j, k int) int {
if i < 0 || j < 0 || k < 0 {
return -inf
}
if i == 0 && j == 0 {
return 0
}
if f[i][j][k] != -1 {
return f[i][j][k]
}
res := grid[i][j]
nk := k
if grid[i][j] != 0 {
nk--
}
a := dfs(i-1, j, nk)
b := dfs(i, j-1, nk)
res += max(a, b)
f[i][j][k] = res
return res
}
ans := dfs(m-1, n-1, k)
if ans < 0 {
return -1
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3742: Maximum Path Score in a Grid
class Solution:
def maxPathScore(self, grid: List[List[int]], k: int) -> int:
@cache
def dfs(i: int, j: int, k: int) -> int:
if i < 0 or j < 0 or k < 0:
return -inf
if i == 0 and j == 0:
return 0
res = grid[i][j]
if grid[i][j]:
k -= 1
a = dfs(i - 1, j, k)
b = dfs(i, j - 1, k)
res += max(a, b)
return res
ans = dfs(len(grid) - 1, len(grid[0]) - 1, k)
dfs.cache_clear()
return -1 if ans < 0 else ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3742: Maximum Path Score in a Grid
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3742: Maximum Path Score in a Grid
// class Solution {
// private int[][] grid;
// private Integer[][][] f;
// private final int inf = 1 << 30;
//
// public int maxPathScore(int[][] grid, int k) {
// this.grid = grid;
// int m = grid.length;
// int n = grid[0].length;
// f = new Integer[m][n][k + 1];
// int ans = dfs(m - 1, n - 1, k);
// return ans < 0 ? -1 : ans;
// }
//
// private int dfs(int i, int j, int k) {
// if (i < 0 || j < 0 || k < 0) {
// return -inf;
// }
// if (i == 0 && j == 0) {
// return 0;
// }
// if (f[i][j][k] != null) {
// return f[i][j][k];
// }
// int res = grid[i][j];
// int nk = k;
// if (grid[i][j] > 0) {
// --nk;
// }
// int a = dfs(i - 1, j, nk);
// int b = dfs(i, j - 1, nk);
// res += Math.max(a, b);
// f[i][j][k] = res;
// return res;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3742: Maximum Path Score in a Grid
function maxPathScore(grid: number[][], k: number): number {
const m = grid.length;
const n = grid[0].length;
const inf = 1 << 30;
const f: number[][][] = Array.from({ length: m }, () =>
Array.from({ length: n }, () => Array(k + 1).fill(-1)),
);
const dfs = (i: number, j: number, k: number): number => {
if (i < 0 || j < 0 || k < 0) {
return -inf;
}
if (i === 0 && j === 0) {
return 0;
}
if (f[i][j][k] !== -1) {
return f[i][j][k];
}
let res = grid[i][j];
let nk = k;
if (grid[i][j] !== 0) {
--nk;
}
const a = dfs(i - 1, j, nk);
const b = dfs(i, j - 1, nk);
res += Math.max(a, b);
f[i][j][k] = res;
return res;
};
const ans = dfs(m - 1, n - 1, k);
return ans < 0 ? -1 : ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.