Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given an integer array nums.
The alternating sum of nums is the value obtained by adding elements at even indices and subtracting elements at odd indices. That is, nums[0] - nums[1] + nums[2] - nums[3]...
Return an integer denoting the alternating sum of nums.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,3,5,7]
Output: -4
Explanation:
nums[0] = 1 and nums[2] = 5 because 0 and 2 are even numbers.nums[1] = 3 and nums[3] = 7 because 1 and 3 are odd numbers.nums[0] - nums[1] + nums[2] - nums[3] = 1 - 3 + 5 - 7 = -4.Example 2:
Input: nums = [100]
Output: 100
Explanation:
nums[0] = 100 because 0 is an even number.nums[0] = 100.Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1001 <= nums[i] <= 100Problem summary: You are given an integer array nums. The alternating sum of nums is the value obtained by adding elements at even indices and subtracting elements at odd indices. That is, nums[0] - nums[1] + nums[2] - nums[3]... Return an integer denoting the alternating sum of nums.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[1,3,5,7]
[100]
alternating-digit-sum)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3701: Compute Alternating Sum
class Solution {
public int alternatingSum(int[] nums) {
int ans = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; ++i) {
ans += (i % 2 == 0 ? nums[i] : -nums[i]);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3701: Compute Alternating Sum
func alternatingSum(nums []int) (ans int) {
for i, x := range nums {
if i%2 == 0 {
ans += x
} else {
ans -= x
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3701: Compute Alternating Sum
class Solution:
def alternatingSum(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
return sum(nums[0::2]) - sum(nums[1::2])
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3701: Compute Alternating Sum
fn alternating_sum(nums: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
nums.into_iter()
.enumerate()
.fold(0, |acc, (i, n)| if i % 2 == 0 { acc + n } else { acc - n })
}
fn main() {
let ret = alternating_sum(vec![1, 3, 5, 7]);
println!("ret={ret}");
}
#[test]
fn test() {
assert_eq!(alternating_sum(vec![1, 3, 5, 7]), -4);
assert_eq!(alternating_sum(vec![100]), 100);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3701: Compute Alternating Sum
function alternatingSum(nums: number[]): number {
let ans: number = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; ++i) {
ans += i % 2 === 0 ? nums[i] : -nums[i];
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.