Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given a positive integer n.
A positive integer is a base-10 component if it is the product of a single digit from 1 to 9 and a non-negative power of 10. For example, 500, 30, and 7 are base-10 components, while 537, 102, and 11 are not.
Express n as a sum of only base-10 components, using the fewest base-10 components possible.
Return an array containing these base-10 components in descending order.
Example 1:
Input: n = 537
Output: [500,30,7]
Explanation:
We can express 537 as 500 + 30 + 7. It is impossible to express 537 as a sum using fewer than 3 base-10 components.
Example 2:
Input: n = 102
Output: [100,2]
Explanation:
We can express 102 as 100 + 2. 102 is not a base-10 component, which means 2 base-10 components are needed.
Example 3:
Input: n = 6
Output: [6]
Explanation:
6 is a base-10 component.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 109Problem summary: You are given a positive integer n. A positive integer is a base-10 component if it is the product of a single digit from 1 to 9 and a non-negative power of 10. For example, 500, 30, and 7 are base-10 components, while 537, 102, and 11 are not. Express n as a sum of only base-10 components, using the fewest base-10 components possible. Return an array containing these base-10 components in descending order.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Math
537
102
6
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3697: Compute Decimal Representation
class Solution {
public int[] decimalRepresentation(int n) {
List<Integer> parts = new ArrayList<>();
int p = 1;
while (n > 0) {
int v = n % 10;
n /= 10;
if (v != 0) {
parts.add(p * v);
}
p *= 10;
}
Collections.reverse(parts);
int[] ans = new int[parts.size()];
for (int i = 0; i < parts.size(); ++i) {
ans[i] = parts.get(i);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3697: Compute Decimal Representation
func decimalRepresentation(n int) []int {
ans := []int{}
p := 1
for n > 0 {
v := n % 10
n /= 10
if v != 0 {
ans = append(ans, p*v)
}
p *= 10
}
slices.Reverse(ans)
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3697: Compute Decimal Representation
class Solution:
def decimalRepresentation(self, n: int) -> List[int]:
ans = []
p = 1
while n:
n, v = divmod(n, 10)
if v:
ans.append(p * v)
p *= 10
ans.reverse()
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3697: Compute Decimal Representation
fn decimal_representation(n: i32) -> Vec<i32> {
let mut ret = vec![];
let mut n = n;
let mut base = 1;
while n > 0 {
let m = n % 10;
if m != 0 {
ret.push(m * base);
}
n /= 10;
base *= 10;
}
ret.into_iter().rev().collect()
}
fn main() {
let ret = decimal_representation(10234567);
println!("ret={ret:?}");
}
#[test]
fn test() {
assert_eq!(decimal_representation(537), vec![500, 30, 7]);
assert_eq!(decimal_representation(102), vec![100, 2]);
assert_eq!(decimal_representation(6), vec![6]);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3697: Compute Decimal Representation
function decimalRepresentation(n: number): number[] {
const ans: number[] = [];
let p: number = 1;
while (n) {
const v = n % 10;
n = (n / 10) | 0;
if (v) {
ans.push(p * v);
}
p *= 10;
}
ans.reverse();
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.