LeetCode #3563 — HARD

Lexicographically Smallest String After Adjacent Removals

Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.

Solve on LeetCode
The Problem

Problem Statement

You are given a string s consisting of lowercase English letters.

You can perform the following operation any number of times (including zero):

  • Remove any pair of adjacent characters in the string that are consecutive in the alphabet, in either order (e.g., 'a' and 'b', or 'b' and 'a').
  • Shift the remaining characters to the left to fill the gap.

Return the lexicographically smallest string that can be obtained after performing the operations optimally.

Note: Consider the alphabet as circular, thus 'a' and 'z' are consecutive.

Example 1:

Input: s = "abc"

Output: "a"

Explanation:

  • Remove "bc" from the string, leaving "a" as the remaining string.
  • No further operations are possible. Thus, the lexicographically smallest string after all possible removals is "a".

Example 2:

Input: s = "bcda"

Output: ""

Explanation:

  • ​​​​​​​Remove "cd" from the string, leaving "ba" as the remaining string.
  • Remove "ba" from the string, leaving "" as the remaining string.
  • No further operations are possible. Thus, the lexicographically smallest string after all possible removals is "".

Example 3:

Input: s = "zdce"

Output: "zdce"

Explanation:

  • Remove "dc" from the string, leaving "ze" as the remaining string.
  • No further operations are possible on "ze".
  • However, since "zdce" is lexicographically smaller than "ze", the smallest string after all possible removals is "zdce".

Constraints:

  • 1 <= s.length <= 250
  • s consists only of lowercase English letters.
Patterns Used

Roadmap

  1. Brute Force Baseline
  2. Core Insight
  3. Algorithm Walkthrough
  4. Edge Cases
  5. Full Annotated Code
  6. Interactive Study Demo
  7. Complexity Analysis
Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: You are given a string s consisting of lowercase English letters. You can perform the following operation any number of times (including zero): Remove any pair of adjacent characters in the string that are consecutive in the alphabet, in either order (e.g., 'a' and 'b', or 'b' and 'a'). Shift the remaining characters to the left to fill the gap. Return the lexicographically smallest string that can be obtained after performing the operations optimally. Note: Consider the alphabet as circular, thus 'a' and 'z' are consecutive.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Dynamic Programming

Example 1

"abc"

Example 2

"bcda"

Example 3

"zdce"
Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

  • As a result of the operation, some of the substrings can be removed
  • Find out using DP, which substrings can we remove
  • Now, try to build the ans using this DP
  • Define ans[i] = lex smallest string that can be made in [i, n - 1], then ans[i] = lex_smallest of { choose one char s[j] in [i, n - 1] + ans[j + 1] }
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

  1. Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
  2. Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
  3. Record answer candidate when condition is met.
  4. Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Largest constraint values
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3563: Lexicographically Smallest String After Adjacent Removals
class Solution {
  public String lexicographicallySmallestString(String s) {
    final int n = s.length();
    // dp[i][j]: the lexicographically smallest string by removing adjacent letters from s[i..j)
    String[][] dp = new String[n + 1][n + 1];

    // Initialize dp[i][i] = "" for all i.
    for (int i = 0; i <= n; ++i)
      dp[i][i] = "";

    for (int d = 1; d <= n; ++d)
      for (int i = 0; i + d <= n; ++i) {
        final int j = i + d;
        // 1. Keep s[i].
        String minString = s.charAt(i) + dp[i + 1][j];
        // 2. Remove s[i] and s[k] if possible.
        for (int k = i + 1; k < j; ++k)
          if (isConsecutive(s.charAt(i), s.charAt(k)) && dp[i + 1][k].isEmpty()) {
            final String candidate = dp[k + 1][j];
            if (candidate.compareTo(minString) < 0)
              minString = candidate;
          }
        dp[i][j] = minString;
      }

    return dp[0][n];
  }

  private boolean isConsecutive(char a, char b) {
    return Math.abs(a - b) == 1 || Math.abs(a - b) == 25;
  }
}
Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time
O(n × m)
Space
O(n × m)

Approach Breakdown

RECURSIVE
O(2ⁿ) time
O(n) space

Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.

DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
O(n × m) time
O(n × m) space

Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.

Shortcut: Count your DP state dimensions → that’s your time. Can you drop one? That’s your space optimization.
Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

State misses one required dimension

Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.

Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.

Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.