Problem summary: You are given a string s consisting of lowercase English letters. You can perform the following operation any number of times (including zero): Remove any pair of adjacent characters in the string that are consecutive in the alphabet, in either order (e.g., 'a' and 'b', or 'b' and 'a'). Shift the remaining characters to the left to fill the gap. Return the lexicographically smallest string that can be obtained after performing the operations optimally. Note: Consider the alphabet as circular, thus 'a' and 'z' are consecutive.
Baseline thinking
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Dynamic Programming
Example 1
"abc"
Example 2
"bcda"
Example 3
"zdce"
Step 02
Core Insight
What unlocks the optimal approach
As a result of the operation, some of the substrings can be removed
Find out using DP, which substrings can we remove
Now, try to build the ans using this DP
Define ans[i] = lex smallest string that can be made in [i, n - 1], then ans[i] = lex_smallest of { choose one char s[j] in [i, n - 1] + ans[j + 1] }
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03
Algorithm Walkthrough
Iteration Checklist
Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
Record answer candidate when condition is met.
Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04
Edge Cases
Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Largest constraint values
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05
Full Annotated Code
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3563: Lexicographically Smallest String After Adjacent Removals
class Solution {
public String lexicographicallySmallestString(String s) {
final int n = s.length();
// dp[i][j]: the lexicographically smallest string by removing adjacent letters from s[i..j)
String[][] dp = new String[n + 1][n + 1];
// Initialize dp[i][i] = "" for all i.
for (int i = 0; i <= n; ++i)
dp[i][i] = "";
for (int d = 1; d <= n; ++d)
for (int i = 0; i + d <= n; ++i) {
final int j = i + d;
// 1. Keep s[i].
String minString = s.charAt(i) + dp[i + 1][j];
// 2. Remove s[i] and s[k] if possible.
for (int k = i + 1; k < j; ++k)
if (isConsecutive(s.charAt(i), s.charAt(k)) && dp[i + 1][k].isEmpty()) {
final String candidate = dp[k + 1][j];
if (candidate.compareTo(minString) < 0)
minString = candidate;
}
dp[i][j] = minString;
}
return dp[0][n];
}
private boolean isConsecutive(char a, char b) {
return Math.abs(a - b) == 1 || Math.abs(a - b) == 25;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3563: Lexicographically Smallest String After Adjacent Removals
package main
// https://space.bilibili.com/206214
func isConsecutive(x, y byte) bool {
d := abs(int(x) - int(y))
return d == 1 || d == 25
}
func lexicographicallySmallestString(s string) (ans string) {
n := len(s)
canBeEmpty := make([][]bool, n)
for i := range canBeEmpty {
canBeEmpty[i] = make([]bool, n)
}
for i := n - 2; i >= 0; i-- {
canBeEmpty[i+1][i] = true // 空串
for j := i + 1; j < n; j += 2 {
// 性质 2
if isConsecutive(s[i], s[j]) && canBeEmpty[i+1][j-1] {
canBeEmpty[i][j] = true
continue
}
// 性质 3
for k := i + 1; k < j-1; k += 2 {
if canBeEmpty[i][k] && canBeEmpty[k+1][j] {
canBeEmpty[i][j] = true
break
}
}
}
}
f := make([]string, n+1)
for i := n - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
// 包含 s[i]
res := string(s[i]) + f[i+1]
// 不包含 s[i],但 s[i] 不能单独消除,必须和其他字符一起消除
for j := i + 1; j < n; j += 2 {
if canBeEmpty[i][j] { // 消除 s[i] 到 s[j]
res = min(res, f[j+1])
}
}
f[i] = res
}
return f[0]
}
func abs(x int) int { if x < 0 { return -x }; return x }
func lexicographicallySmallestString1(s string) string {
n := len(s)
memoEmpty := make([][]int8, n)
for i := range memoEmpty {
memoEmpty[i] = make([]int8, n)
for j := range memoEmpty[i] {
memoEmpty[i][j] = -1
}
}
var canBeEmpty func(int, int) int8
canBeEmpty = func(i, j int) (res int8) {
if i > j { // 空串
return 1
}
p := &memoEmpty[i][j]
if *p != -1 {
return *p
}
defer func() { *p = res }()
// 性质 2
if isConsecutive(s[i], s[j]) && canBeEmpty(i+1, j-1) > 0 {
return 1
}
// 性质 3
for k := i + 1; k < j; k += 2 {
if canBeEmpty(i, k) > 0 && canBeEmpty(k+1, j) > 0 {
return 1
}
}
return 0
}
memoDfs := make([]string, n)
for i := range memoDfs {
memoDfs[i] = "?"
}
var dfs func(int) string
dfs = func(i int) string {
if i == n {
return ""
}
p := &memoDfs[i]
if *p != "?" {
return *p
}
// 包含 s[i]
res := string(s[i]) + dfs(i+1)
// 不包含 s[i],但 s[i] 不能单独消除,必须和其他字符一起消除
for j := i + 1; j < n; j += 2 {
if canBeEmpty(i, j) > 0 { // 消除 s[i] 到 s[j]
res = min(res, dfs(j+1))
}
}
*p = res
return res
}
return dfs(0)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3563: Lexicographically Smallest String After Adjacent Removals
class Solution:
def lexicographicallySmallestString(self, s: str) -> str:
n = len(s)
# dp[i][j]: the lexicographically smallest string by removing adjacent
# letters from s[i..j)
dp = [[''] * (n + 1) for _ in range(n + 1)]
for d in range(1, n + 1):
for i in range(n - d + 1):
j = i + d
# 1. Keep s[i].
minString = s[i] + dp[i + 1][j]
# 2. Remove s[i] and s[k] if possible.
for k in range(i + 1, j):
if self._isConsecutive(s[i], s[k]) and dp[i + 1][k] == '':
candidate = dp[k + 1][j]
if candidate < minString:
minString = candidate
dp[i][j] = minString
return dp[0][n]
def _isConsecutive(self, a: str, b: str) -> bool:
return abs(ord(a) - ord(b)) == 1 or abs(ord(a) - ord(b)) == 25
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3563: Lexicographically Smallest String After Adjacent Removals
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3563: Lexicographically Smallest String After Adjacent Removals
// class Solution {
// public String lexicographicallySmallestString(String s) {
// final int n = s.length();
// // dp[i][j]: the lexicographically smallest string by removing adjacent letters from s[i..j)
// String[][] dp = new String[n + 1][n + 1];
//
// // Initialize dp[i][i] = "" for all i.
// for (int i = 0; i <= n; ++i)
// dp[i][i] = "";
//
// for (int d = 1; d <= n; ++d)
// for (int i = 0; i + d <= n; ++i) {
// final int j = i + d;
// // 1. Keep s[i].
// String minString = s.charAt(i) + dp[i + 1][j];
// // 2. Remove s[i] and s[k] if possible.
// for (int k = i + 1; k < j; ++k)
// if (isConsecutive(s.charAt(i), s.charAt(k)) && dp[i + 1][k].isEmpty()) {
// final String candidate = dp[k + 1][j];
// if (candidate.compareTo(minString) < 0)
// minString = candidate;
// }
// dp[i][j] = minString;
// }
//
// return dp[0][n];
// }
//
// private boolean isConsecutive(char a, char b) {
// return Math.abs(a - b) == 1 || Math.abs(a - b) == 25;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3563: Lexicographically Smallest String After Adjacent Removals
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3563: Lexicographically Smallest String After Adjacent Removals
// class Solution {
// public String lexicographicallySmallestString(String s) {
// final int n = s.length();
// // dp[i][j]: the lexicographically smallest string by removing adjacent letters from s[i..j)
// String[][] dp = new String[n + 1][n + 1];
//
// // Initialize dp[i][i] = "" for all i.
// for (int i = 0; i <= n; ++i)
// dp[i][i] = "";
//
// for (int d = 1; d <= n; ++d)
// for (int i = 0; i + d <= n; ++i) {
// final int j = i + d;
// // 1. Keep s[i].
// String minString = s.charAt(i) + dp[i + 1][j];
// // 2. Remove s[i] and s[k] if possible.
// for (int k = i + 1; k < j; ++k)
// if (isConsecutive(s.charAt(i), s.charAt(k)) && dp[i + 1][k].isEmpty()) {
// final String candidate = dp[k + 1][j];
// if (candidate.compareTo(minString) < 0)
// minString = candidate;
// }
// dp[i][j] = minString;
// }
//
// return dp[0][n];
// }
//
// private boolean isConsecutive(char a, char b) {
// return Math.abs(a - b) == 1 || Math.abs(a - b) == 25;
// }
// }
Step 06
Interactive Study Demo
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07
Complexity Analysis
Time
O(n × m)
Space
O(n × m)
Approach Breakdown
RECURSIVE
O(2ⁿ) time
O(n) space
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
O(n × m) time
O(n × m) space
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Shortcut: Count your DP state dimensions → that’s your time. Can you drop one? That’s your space optimization.
Coach Notes
Common Mistakes
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
State misses one required dimension
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.