LeetCode #3544 — HARD

Subtree Inversion Sum

Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.

Solve on LeetCode
The Problem

Problem Statement

You are given an undirected tree rooted at node 0, with n nodes numbered from 0 to n - 1. The tree is represented by a 2D integer array edges of length n - 1, where edges[i] = [ui, vi] indicates an edge between nodes ui and vi.

You are also given an integer array nums of length n, where nums[i] represents the value at node i, and an integer k.

You may perform inversion operations on a subset of nodes subject to the following rules:

  • Subtree Inversion Operation:

    • When you invert a node, every value in the subtree rooted at that node is multiplied by -1.

  • Distance Constraint on Inversions:

    • You may only invert a node if it is "sufficiently far" from any other inverted node.

    • Specifically, if you invert two nodes a and b such that one is an ancestor of the other (i.e., if LCA(a, b) = a or LCA(a, b) = b), then the distance (the number of edges on the unique path between them) must be at least k.

Return the maximum possible sum of the tree's node values after applying inversion operations.

Example 1:

Input: edges = [[0,1],[0,2],[1,3],[1,4],[2,5],[2,6]], nums = [4,-8,-6,3,7,-2,5], k = 2

Output: 27

Explanation:

  • Apply inversion operations at nodes 0, 3, 4 and 6.
  • The final nums array is [-4, 8, 6, 3, 7, 2, 5], and the total sum is 27.

Example 2:

Input: edges = [[0,1],[1,2],[2,3],[3,4]], nums = [-1,3,-2,4,-5], k = 2

Output: 9

Explanation:

  • Apply the inversion operation at node 4.
  • The final nums array becomes [-1, 3, -2, 4, 5], and the total sum is 9.

Example 3:

Input: edges = [[0,1],[0,2]], nums = [0,-1,-2], k = 3

Output: 3

Explanation:

Apply inversion operations at nodes 1 and 2.

Constraints:

  • 2 <= n <= 5 * 104
  • edges.length == n - 1
  • edges[i] = [ui, vi]
  • 0 <= ui, vi < n
  • nums.length == n
  • -5 * 104 <= nums[i] <= 5 * 104
  • 1 <= k <= 50
  • The input is generated such that edges represents a valid tree.
Patterns Used

Roadmap

  1. Brute Force Baseline
  2. Core Insight
  3. Algorithm Walkthrough
  4. Edge Cases
  5. Full Annotated Code
  6. Interactive Study Demo
  7. Complexity Analysis
Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: You are given an undirected tree rooted at node 0, with n nodes numbered from 0 to n - 1. The tree is represented by a 2D integer array edges of length n - 1, where edges[i] = [ui, vi] indicates an edge between nodes ui and vi. You are also given an integer array nums of length n, where nums[i] represents the value at node i, and an integer k. You may perform inversion operations on a subset of nodes subject to the following rules: Subtree Inversion Operation: When you invert a node, every value in the subtree rooted at that node is multiplied by -1. Distance Constraint on Inversions: You may only invert a node if it is "sufficiently far" from any other inverted node. Specifically, if you invert two nodes a and b such that one is an ancestor of the other (i.e., if LCA(a, b) = a or LCA(a, b) = b), then the distance (the number of edges on the unique path between them) must be at least k.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Array · Dynamic Programming · Tree

Example 1

[[0,1],[0,2],[1,3],[1,4],[2,5],[2,6]]
[4,-8,-6,3,7,-2,5]
2

Example 2

[[0,1],[1,2],[2,3],[3,4]]
[-1,3,-2,4,-5]
2

Example 3

[[0,1],[0,2]]
[0,-1,-2]
3
Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

  • Use tree‑based dynamic programming
  • Define your DP state as dp[node][parityFromAncestorInversions][distSinceLastInversion]
  • <code>node</code> is the current tree node
  • <code>parityFromAncestorInversions</code> indicates whether the subtree values have been flipped an even (0) or odd (1) number of times by ancestor inversions
  • <code>distSinceLastInversion</code> tracks the number of edges from this node up to the most recent ancestor inversion
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

  1. Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
  2. Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
  3. Record answer candidate when condition is met.
  4. Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Largest constraint values
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3544: Subtree Inversion Sum
class Solution {
  public long subtreeInversionSum(int[][] edges, int[] nums, int k) {
    final int n = edges.length + 1;
    int[] parent = new int[n];
    List<Integer>[] graph = new List[n];
    Arrays.fill(parent, -1);
    Arrays.setAll(graph, i -> new ArrayList<>());

    for (int[] edge : edges) {
      final int u = edge[0];
      final int v = edge[1];
      graph[u].add(v);
      graph[v].add(u);
    }

    return dfs(graph, /*u=*/0, /*stepsSinceInversion=*/k,
               /*inverted=*/false, nums, k, parent, new Long[n][k + 1][2]);
  }

  private long dfs(List<Integer>[] graph, int u, int stepsSinceInversion, boolean inverted,
                   int[] nums, int k, int[] parent, Long[][][] mem) {
    if (mem[u][stepsSinceInversion][inverted ? 1 : 0] != null)
      return mem[u][stepsSinceInversion][inverted ? 1 : 0];
    long num = inverted ? -nums[u] : nums[u];
    long negNum = -num;
    for (final int v : graph[u]) {
      if (v == parent[u])
        continue;
      parent[v] = u;
      num += dfs(graph, v, Math.min(k, stepsSinceInversion + 1), inverted, nums, k, parent, mem);
      if (stepsSinceInversion == k)
        negNum += dfs(graph, v, 1, !inverted, nums, k, parent, mem);
    }
    return mem[u][stepsSinceInversion][inverted ? 1 : 0] =
               (stepsSinceInversion == k) ? Math.max(num, negNum) : num;
  }
}
Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time
O(n × m)
Space
O(n × m)

Approach Breakdown

RECURSIVE
O(2ⁿ) time
O(n) space

Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.

DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
O(n × m) time
O(n × m) space

Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.

Shortcut: Count your DP state dimensions → that’s your time. Can you drop one? That’s your space optimization.
Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Off-by-one on range boundaries

Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.

Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.

Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.

State misses one required dimension

Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.

Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.

Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.

Forgetting null/base-case handling

Wrong move: Recursive traversal assumes children always exist.

Usually fails on: Leaf nodes throw errors or create wrong depth/path values.

Fix: Handle null/base cases before recursive transitions.