Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given an array of positive integers nums.
An array arr is called product equivalent if prod(arr) == lcm(arr) * gcd(arr), where:
prod(arr) is the product of all elements of arr.gcd(arr) is the GCD of all elements of arr.lcm(arr) is the LCM of all elements of arr.Return the length of the longest product equivalent subarray of nums.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,1,2,1,1,1]
Output: 5
Explanation:
The longest product equivalent subarray is [1, 2, 1, 1, 1], where prod([1, 2, 1, 1, 1]) = 2, gcd([1, 2, 1, 1, 1]) = 1, and lcm([1, 2, 1, 1, 1]) = 2.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [2,3,4,5,6]
Output: 3
Explanation:
The longest product equivalent subarray is [3, 4, 5].
Example 3:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,1,4,5,1]
Output: 5
Constraints:
2 <= nums.length <= 1001 <= nums[i] <= 10Problem summary: You are given an array of positive integers nums. An array arr is called product equivalent if prod(arr) == lcm(arr) * gcd(arr), where: prod(arr) is the product of all elements of arr. gcd(arr) is the GCD of all elements of arr. lcm(arr) is the LCM of all elements of arr. Return the length of the longest product equivalent subarray of nums.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Math · Sliding Window
[1,2,1,2,1,1,1]
[2,3,4,5,6]
[1,2,3,1,4,5,1]
find-greatest-common-divisor-of-array)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3411: Maximum Subarray With Equal Products
class Solution {
public int maxLength(int[] nums) {
int mx = 0, ml = 1;
for (int x : nums) {
mx = Math.max(mx, x);
ml = lcm(ml, x);
}
int maxP = ml * mx;
int n = nums.length;
int ans = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
int p = 1, g = 0, l = 1;
for (int j = i; j < n; ++j) {
p *= nums[j];
g = gcd(g, nums[j]);
l = lcm(l, nums[j]);
if (p == g * l) {
ans = Math.max(ans, j - i + 1);
}
if (p > maxP) {
break;
}
}
}
return ans;
}
private int gcd(int a, int b) {
while (b != 0) {
int temp = b;
b = a % b;
a = temp;
}
return a;
}
private int lcm(int a, int b) {
return a / gcd(a, b) * b;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3411: Maximum Subarray With Equal Products
func maxLength(nums []int) int {
mx, ml := 0, 1
for _, x := range nums {
mx = max(mx, x)
ml = lcm(ml, x)
}
maxP := ml * mx
n := len(nums)
ans := 0
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
p, g, l := 1, 0, 1
for j := i; j < n; j++ {
p *= nums[j]
g = gcd(g, nums[j])
l = lcm(l, nums[j])
if p == g*l {
ans = max(ans, j-i+1)
}
if p > maxP {
break
}
}
}
return ans
}
func gcd(a, b int) int {
for b != 0 {
a, b = b, a%b
}
return a
}
func lcm(a, b int) int {
return a / gcd(a, b) * b
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3411: Maximum Subarray With Equal Products
class Solution:
def maxLength(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(nums)
ans = 0
max_p = lcm(*nums) * max(nums)
for i in range(n):
p, g, l = 1, 0, 1
for j in range(i, n):
p *= nums[j]
g = gcd(g, nums[j])
l = lcm(l, nums[j])
if p == g * l:
ans = max(ans, j - i + 1)
if p > max_p:
break
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3411: Maximum Subarray With Equal Products
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3411: Maximum Subarray With Equal Products
// class Solution {
// public int maxLength(int[] nums) {
// int mx = 0, ml = 1;
// for (int x : nums) {
// mx = Math.max(mx, x);
// ml = lcm(ml, x);
// }
// int maxP = ml * mx;
// int n = nums.length;
// int ans = 0;
// for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
// int p = 1, g = 0, l = 1;
// for (int j = i; j < n; ++j) {
// p *= nums[j];
// g = gcd(g, nums[j]);
// l = lcm(l, nums[j]);
// if (p == g * l) {
// ans = Math.max(ans, j - i + 1);
// }
// if (p > maxP) {
// break;
// }
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
//
// private int gcd(int a, int b) {
// while (b != 0) {
// int temp = b;
// b = a % b;
// a = temp;
// }
// return a;
// }
//
// private int lcm(int a, int b) {
// return a / gcd(a, b) * b;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3411: Maximum Subarray With Equal Products
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3411: Maximum Subarray With Equal Products
// class Solution {
// public int maxLength(int[] nums) {
// int mx = 0, ml = 1;
// for (int x : nums) {
// mx = Math.max(mx, x);
// ml = lcm(ml, x);
// }
// int maxP = ml * mx;
// int n = nums.length;
// int ans = 0;
// for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
// int p = 1, g = 0, l = 1;
// for (int j = i; j < n; ++j) {
// p *= nums[j];
// g = gcd(g, nums[j]);
// l = lcm(l, nums[j]);
// if (p == g * l) {
// ans = Math.max(ans, j - i + 1);
// }
// if (p > maxP) {
// break;
// }
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
//
// private int gcd(int a, int b) {
// while (b != 0) {
// int temp = b;
// b = a % b;
// a = temp;
// }
// return a;
// }
//
// private int lcm(int a, int b) {
// return a / gcd(a, b) * b;
// }
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
For each starting index, scan the next k elements to compute the window aggregate. There are n−k+1 starting positions, each requiring O(k) work, giving O(n × k) total. No extra space since we recompute from scratch each time.
The window expands and contracts as we scan left to right. Each element enters the window at most once and leaves at most once, giving 2n total operations = O(n). Space depends on what we track inside the window (a hash map of at most k distinct elements, or O(1) for a fixed-size window).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Wrong move: Using `if` instead of `while` leaves the window invalid for multiple iterations.
Usually fails on: Over-limit windows stay invalid and produce wrong lengths/counts.
Fix: Shrink in a `while` loop until the invariant is valid again.