Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using core interview patterns strategy.
You are given a string s of length n and an integer k, where n is a multiple of k. Your task is to hash the string s into a new string called result, which has a length of n / k.
First, divide s into n / k substrings, each with a length of k. Then, initialize result as an empty string.
For each substring in order from the beginning:
'a' → 0, 'b' → 1, ..., 'z' → 25).hashedChar.hashedChar.result.Return result.
Example 1:
Input: s = "abcd", k = 2
Output: "bf"
Explanation:
First substring: "ab", 0 + 1 = 1, 1 % 26 = 1, result[0] = 'b'.
Second substring: "cd", 2 + 3 = 5, 5 % 26 = 5, result[1] = 'f'.
Example 2:
Input: s = "mxz", k = 3
Output: "i"
Explanation:
The only substring: "mxz", 12 + 23 + 25 = 60, 60 % 26 = 8, result[0] = 'i'.
Constraints:
1 <= k <= 100k <= s.length <= 1000s.length is divisible by k.s consists only of lowercase English letters.Problem summary: You are given a string s of length n and an integer k, where n is a multiple of k. Your task is to hash the string s into a new string called result, which has a length of n / k. First, divide s into n / k substrings, each with a length of k. Then, initialize result as an empty string. For each substring in order from the beginning: The hash value of a character is the index of that character in the English alphabet (e.g., 'a' → 0, 'b' → 1, ..., 'z' → 25). Calculate the sum of all the hash values of the characters in the substring. Find the remainder of this sum when divided by 26, which is called hashedChar. Identify the character in the English lowercase alphabet that corresponds to hashedChar. Append that character to the end of result. Return result.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
"abcd" 2
"mxz" 3
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3271: Hash Divided String
class Solution {
public String stringHash(String s, int k) {
StringBuilder ans = new StringBuilder();
int n = s.length();
for (int i = 0; i < n; i += k) {
int t = 0;
for (int j = i; j < i + k; ++j) {
t += s.charAt(j) - 'a';
}
int hashedChar = t % 26;
ans.append((char) ('a' + hashedChar));
}
return ans.toString();
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3271: Hash Divided String
func stringHash(s string, k int) string {
n := len(s)
ans := make([]byte, 0, n/k)
for i := 0; i < n; i += k {
t := 0
for j := i; j < i+k; j++ {
t += int(s[j] - 'a')
}
hashedChar := t % 26
ans = append(ans, 'a'+byte(hashedChar))
}
return string(ans)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3271: Hash Divided String
class Solution:
def stringHash(self, s: str, k: int) -> str:
ans = []
for i in range(0, len(s), k):
t = 0
for j in range(i, i + k):
t += ord(s[j]) - ord("a")
hashedChar = t % 26
ans.append(chr(ord("a") + hashedChar))
return "".join(ans)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3271: Hash Divided String
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3271: Hash Divided String
// class Solution {
// public String stringHash(String s, int k) {
// StringBuilder ans = new StringBuilder();
// int n = s.length();
// for (int i = 0; i < n; i += k) {
// int t = 0;
// for (int j = i; j < i + k; ++j) {
// t += s.charAt(j) - 'a';
// }
// int hashedChar = t % 26;
// ans.append((char) ('a' + hashedChar));
// }
// return ans.toString();
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3271: Hash Divided String
function stringHash(s: string, k: number): string {
const ans: string[] = [];
const n: number = s.length;
for (let i = 0; i < n; i += k) {
let t: number = 0;
for (let j = i; j < i + k; j++) {
t += s.charCodeAt(j) - 97;
}
const hashedChar: number = t % 26;
ans.push(String.fromCharCode(97 + hashedChar));
}
return ans.join('');
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.