Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given an integer n representing the number of players in a game and a 2D array pick where pick[i] = [xi, yi] represents that the player xi picked a ball of color yi.
Player i wins the game if they pick strictly more than i balls of the same color. In other words,
i wins if they pick at least i + 1 balls of the same color.Return the number of players who win the game.
Note that multiple players can win the game.
Example 1:
Input: n = 4, pick = [[0,0],[1,0],[1,0],[2,1],[2,1],[2,0]]
Output: 2
Explanation:
Player 0 and player 1 win the game, while players 2 and 3 do not win.
Example 2:
Input: n = 5, pick = [[1,1],[1,2],[1,3],[1,4]]
Output: 0
Explanation:
No player wins the game.
Example 3:
Input: n = 5, pick = [[1,1],[2,4],[2,4],[2,4]]
Output: 1
Explanation:
Player 2 wins the game by picking 3 balls with color 4.
Constraints:
2 <= n <= 101 <= pick.length <= 100pick[i].length == 20 <= xi <= n - 1 0 <= yi <= 10Problem summary: You are given an integer n representing the number of players in a game and a 2D array pick where pick[i] = [xi, yi] represents that the player xi picked a ball of color yi. Player i wins the game if they pick strictly more than i balls of the same color. In other words, Player 0 wins if they pick any ball. Player 1 wins if they pick at least two balls of the same color. ... Player i wins if they pick at least i + 1 balls of the same color. Return the number of players who win the game. Note that multiple players can win the game.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map
4 [[0,0],[1,0],[1,0],[2,1],[2,1],[2,0]]
5 [[1,1],[1,2],[1,3],[1,4]]
5 [[1,1],[2,4],[2,4],[2,4]]
can-i-win)predict-the-winner)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3238: Find the Number of Winning Players
class Solution {
public int winningPlayerCount(int n, int[][] pick) {
int[][] cnt = new int[n][11];
Set<Integer> s = new HashSet<>();
for (var p : pick) {
int x = p[0], y = p[1];
if (++cnt[x][y] > x) {
s.add(x);
}
}
return s.size();
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3238: Find the Number of Winning Players
func winningPlayerCount(n int, pick [][]int) int {
cnt := make([][11]int, n)
s := map[int]struct{}{}
for _, p := range pick {
x, y := p[0], p[1]
cnt[x][y]++
if cnt[x][y] > x {
s[x] = struct{}{}
}
}
return len(s)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3238: Find the Number of Winning Players
class Solution:
def winningPlayerCount(self, n: int, pick: List[List[int]]) -> int:
cnt = [[0] * 11 for _ in range(n)]
s = set()
for x, y in pick:
cnt[x][y] += 1
if cnt[x][y] > x:
s.add(x)
return len(s)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3238: Find the Number of Winning Players
/**
* [3238] Find the Number of Winning Players
*/
pub struct Solution {}
// submission codes start here
impl Solution {
pub fn winning_player_count(n: i32, pick: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> i32 {
use std::collections::HashMap;
let n = n as usize;
let mut player = vec![HashMap::new(); n];
for p in pick {
let (p, b) = (p[0] as usize, p[1]);
let mut entry = player[p].entry(b).or_insert(0);
*entry += 1;
}
player
.iter()
.enumerate()
.filter_map(|(i, map)| {
if map.iter().any(|(_, v)| *v > i) {
Some(())
} else {
None
}
})
.count() as i32
}
}
// submission codes end
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_3238() {
assert_eq!(
2,
Solution::winning_player_count(
4,
vec![
vec![0, 0],
vec![1, 0],
vec![1, 0],
vec![2, 1],
vec![2, 1],
vec![2, 0]
]
)
);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3238: Find the Number of Winning Players
function winningPlayerCount(n: number, pick: number[][]): number {
const cnt: number[][] = Array.from({ length: n }, () => Array(11).fill(0));
const s = new Set<number>();
for (const [x, y] of pick) {
if (++cnt[x][y] > x) {
s.add(x);
}
}
return s.size;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.