Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an integer array nums of size n where n is even, and an integer k.
You can perform some changes on the array, where in one change you can replace any element in the array with any integer in the range from 0 to k.
You need to perform some changes (possibly none) such that the final array satisfies the following condition:
X such that abs(a[i] - a[n - i - 1]) = X for all (0 <= i < n).Return the minimum number of changes required to satisfy the above condition.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,0,1,2,4,3], k = 4
Output: 2
Explanation:
We can perform the following changes:
nums[1] by 2. The resulting array is nums = [1,2,1,2,4,3].nums[3] by 3. The resulting array is nums = [1,2,1,3,4,3].The integer X will be 2.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [0,1,2,3,3,6,5,4], k = 6
Output: 2
Explanation:
We can perform the following operations:
nums[3] by 0. The resulting array is nums = [0,1,2,0,3,6,5,4].nums[4] by 4. The resulting array is nums = [0,1,2,0,4,6,5,4].The integer X will be 4.
Constraints:
2 <= n == nums.length <= 105n is even.0 <= nums[i] <= k <= 105Problem summary: You are given an integer array nums of size n where n is even, and an integer k. You can perform some changes on the array, where in one change you can replace any element in the array with any integer in the range from 0 to k. You need to perform some changes (possibly none) such that the final array satisfies the following condition: There exists an integer X such that abs(a[i] - a[n - i - 1]) = X for all (0 <= i < n). Return the minimum number of changes required to satisfy the above condition.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map
[1,0,1,2,4,3] 4
[0,1,2,3,3,6,5,4] 6
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3224: Minimum Array Changes to Make Differences Equal
class Solution {
public int minChanges(int[] nums, int k) {
int[] d = new int[k + 2];
int n = nums.length;
for (int i = 0; i < n / 2; ++i) {
int x = Math.min(nums[i], nums[n - i - 1]);
int y = Math.max(nums[i], nums[n - i - 1]);
d[0] += 1;
d[y - x] -= 1;
d[y - x + 1] += 1;
d[Math.max(y, k - x) + 1] -= 1;
d[Math.max(y, k - x) + 1] += 2;
}
int ans = n, s = 0;
for (int x : d) {
s += x;
ans = Math.min(ans, s);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3224: Minimum Array Changes to Make Differences Equal
func minChanges(nums []int, k int) int {
d := make([]int, k+2)
n := len(nums)
for i := 0; i < n/2; i++ {
x, y := nums[i], nums[n-1-i]
if x > y {
x, y = y, x
}
d[0] += 1
d[y-x] -= 1
d[y-x+1] += 1
d[max(y, k-x)+1] -= 1
d[max(y, k-x)+1] += 2
}
ans, s := n, 0
for _, x := range d {
s += x
ans = min(ans, s)
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3224: Minimum Array Changes to Make Differences Equal
class Solution:
def minChanges(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int:
d = [0] * (k + 2)
n = len(nums)
for i in range(n // 2):
x, y = nums[i], nums[-i - 1]
if x > y:
x, y = y, x
d[0] += 1
d[y - x] -= 1
d[y - x + 1] += 1
d[max(y, k - x) + 1] -= 1
d[max(y, k - x) + 1] += 2
return min(accumulate(d))
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3224: Minimum Array Changes to Make Differences Equal
impl Solution {
pub fn min_changes(nums: Vec<i32>, k: i32) -> i32 {
let n = nums.len();
let mut d = vec![0; (k + 2) as usize];
for i in 0..n / 2 {
let x = nums[i].min(nums[n - i - 1]);
let y = nums[i].max(nums[n - i - 1]);
d[0] += 1;
d[(y - x) as usize] -= 1;
d[(y - x + 1) as usize] += 1;
let idx = (y.max(k - x) + 1) as usize;
d[idx] -= 1;
d[idx] += 2;
}
let mut ans = n as i32;
let mut s = 0;
for x in d {
s += x;
ans = ans.min(s);
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3224: Minimum Array Changes to Make Differences Equal
function minChanges(nums: number[], k: number): number {
const d: number[] = Array(k + 2).fill(0);
const n = nums.length;
for (let i = 0; i < n >> 1; ++i) {
const x = Math.min(nums[i], nums[n - 1 - i]);
const y = Math.max(nums[i], nums[n - 1 - i]);
d[0] += 1;
d[y - x] -= 1;
d[y - x + 1] += 1;
d[Math.max(y, k - x) + 1] -= 1;
d[Math.max(y, k - x) + 1] += 2;
}
let [ans, s] = [n, 0];
for (const x of d) {
s += x;
ans = Math.min(ans, s);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.