Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an array nums consisting of positive integers where all integers have the same number of digits.
The digit difference between two integers is the count of different digits that are in the same position in the two integers.
Return the sum of the digit differences between all pairs of integers in nums.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [13,23,12]
Output: 4
Explanation:
We have the following:
- The digit difference between 13 and 23 is 1.
- The digit difference between 13 and 12 is 1.
- The digit difference between 23 and 12 is 2.
So the total sum of digit differences between all pairs of integers is 1 + 1 + 2 = 4.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [10,10,10,10]
Output: 0
Explanation:
All the integers in the array are the same. So the total sum of digit differences between all pairs of integers will be 0.
Constraints:
2 <= nums.length <= 1051 <= nums[i] < 109nums have the same number of digits.Problem summary: You are given an array nums consisting of positive integers where all integers have the same number of digits. The digit difference between two integers is the count of different digits that are in the same position in the two integers. Return the sum of the digit differences between all pairs of integers in nums.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Math
[13,23,12]
[10,10,10,10]
total-hamming-distance)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3153: Sum of Digit Differences of All Pairs
class Solution {
public long sumDigitDifferences(int[] nums) {
int n = nums.length;
int m = (int) Math.floor(Math.log10(nums[0])) + 1;
int[] cnt = new int[10];
long ans = 0;
for (int k = 0; k < m; ++k) {
Arrays.fill(cnt, 0);
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
++cnt[nums[i] % 10];
nums[i] /= 10;
}
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
ans += 1L * cnt[i] * (n - cnt[i]);
}
}
return ans / 2;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3153: Sum of Digit Differences of All Pairs
func sumDigitDifferences(nums []int) (ans int64) {
n := len(nums)
m := int(math.Floor(math.Log10(float64(nums[0])))) + 1
for k := 0; k < m; k++ {
cnt := [10]int{}
for i, x := range nums {
cnt[x%10]++
nums[i] /= 10
}
for _, v := range cnt {
ans += int64(v) * int64(n-v)
}
}
ans /= 2
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3153: Sum of Digit Differences of All Pairs
class Solution:
def sumDigitDifferences(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(nums)
m = int(log10(nums[0])) + 1
ans = 0
for _ in range(m):
cnt = Counter()
for i, x in enumerate(nums):
nums[i], y = divmod(x, 10)
cnt[y] += 1
ans += sum(v * (n - v) for v in cnt.values()) // 2
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3153: Sum of Digit Differences of All Pairs
/**
* [3153] Sum of Digit Differences of All Pairs
*/
pub struct Solution {}
// submission codes start here
impl Solution {
pub fn sum_digit_differences(nums: Vec<i32>) -> i64 {
let n = nums.len() as i64;
let mut result = 0;
let mut base = 1;
loop {
if nums[0] / base == 0 {
break;
}
let mut map = vec![0; 10];
for &num in nums.iter() {
let digit = (num / base % 10) as usize;
map[digit] += 1;
}
result += map
.iter()
.filter_map(|x| if *x == 0 { None } else { Some(*x * (n - *x)) })
.sum::<i64>()
/ 2;
base *= 10;
}
result
}
}
// submission codes end
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_3153() {
assert_eq!(4, Solution::sum_digit_differences(vec![13, 23, 12]));
assert_eq!(0, Solution::sum_digit_differences(vec![10, 10, 10, 10]));
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3153: Sum of Digit Differences of All Pairs
function sumDigitDifferences(nums: number[]): number {
const n = nums.length;
const m = Math.floor(Math.log10(nums[0])) + 1;
let ans: bigint = BigInt(0);
for (let k = 0; k < m; ++k) {
const cnt: number[] = Array(10).fill(0);
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
++cnt[nums[i] % 10];
nums[i] = Math.floor(nums[i] / 10);
}
for (let i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
ans += BigInt(cnt[i]) * BigInt(n - cnt[i]);
}
}
ans /= BigInt(2);
return Number(ans);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.