Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
An array is considered special if every pair of its adjacent elements contains two numbers with different parity.
You are given an array of integer nums and a 2D integer matrix queries, where for queries[i] = [fromi, toi] your task is to check that subarray nums[fromi..toi] is special or not.
Return an array of booleans answer such that answer[i] is true if nums[fromi..toi] is special.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [3,4,1,2,6], queries = [[0,4]]
Output: [false]
Explanation:
The subarray is [3,4,1,2,6]. 2 and 6 are both even.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [4,3,1,6], queries = [[0,2],[2,3]]
Output: [false,true]
Explanation:
[4,3,1]. 3 and 1 are both odd. So the answer to this query is false.[1,6]. There is only one pair: (1,6) and it contains numbers with different parity. So the answer to this query is true.Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1051 <= nums[i] <= 1051 <= queries.length <= 105queries[i].length == 20 <= queries[i][0] <= queries[i][1] <= nums.length - 1Problem summary: An array is considered special if every pair of its adjacent elements contains two numbers with different parity. You are given an array of integer nums and a 2D integer matrix queries, where for queries[i] = [fromi, toi] your task is to check that subarray nums[fromi..toi] is special or not. Return an array of booleans answer such that answer[i] is true if nums[fromi..toi] is special.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Binary Search
[3,4,1,2,6] [[0,4]]
[4,3,1,6] [[0,2],[2,3]]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3152: Special Array II
class Solution {
public boolean[] isArraySpecial(int[] nums, int[][] queries) {
int n = nums.length;
int[] d = new int[n];
for (int i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
if (nums[i] % 2 != nums[i - 1] % 2) {
d[i] = d[i - 1];
} else {
d[i] = i;
}
}
int m = queries.length;
boolean[] ans = new boolean[m];
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
ans[i] = d[queries[i][1]] <= queries[i][0];
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3152: Special Array II
func isArraySpecial(nums []int, queries [][]int) (ans []bool) {
n := len(nums)
d := make([]int, n)
for i := range d {
d[i] = i
}
for i := 1; i < len(nums); i++ {
if nums[i]%2 != nums[i-1]%2 {
d[i] = d[i-1]
}
}
for _, q := range queries {
ans = append(ans, d[q[1]] <= q[0])
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3152: Special Array II
class Solution:
def isArraySpecial(self, nums: List[int], queries: List[List[int]]) -> List[bool]:
n = len(nums)
d = list(range(n))
for i in range(1, n):
if nums[i] % 2 != nums[i - 1] % 2:
d[i] = d[i - 1]
return [d[t] <= f for f, t in queries]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3152: Special Array II
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3152: Special Array II
// class Solution {
// public boolean[] isArraySpecial(int[] nums, int[][] queries) {
// int n = nums.length;
// int[] d = new int[n];
// for (int i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
// if (nums[i] % 2 != nums[i - 1] % 2) {
// d[i] = d[i - 1];
// } else {
// d[i] = i;
// }
// }
// int m = queries.length;
// boolean[] ans = new boolean[m];
// for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
// ans[i] = d[queries[i][1]] <= queries[i][0];
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3152: Special Array II
function isArraySpecial(nums: number[], queries: number[][]): boolean[] {
const n = nums.length;
const d: number[] = Array.from({ length: n }, (_, i) => i);
for (let i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
if (nums[i] % 2 !== nums[i - 1] % 2) {
d[i] = d[i - 1];
}
}
return queries.map(([from, to]) => d[to] <= from);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Check every element from left to right until we find the target or exhaust the array. Each comparison is O(1), and we may visit all n elements, giving O(n). No extra space needed.
Each comparison eliminates half the remaining search space. After k comparisons, the space is n/2ᵏ. We stop when the space is 1, so k = log₂ n. No extra memory needed — just two pointers (lo, hi).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Setting `lo = mid` or `hi = mid` can stall and create an infinite loop.
Usually fails on: Two-element ranges never converge.
Fix: Use `lo = mid + 1` or `hi = mid - 1` where appropriate.