Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given a 2D matrix grid of size m x n. In one operation, you can change the value of any cell to any non-negative number. You need to perform some operations such that each cell grid[i][j] is:
grid[i][j] == grid[i + 1][j] (if it exists).grid[i][j] != grid[i][j + 1] (if it exists).Return the minimum number of operations needed.
Example 1:
Input: grid = [[1,0,2],[1,0,2]]
Output: 0
Explanation:
All the cells in the matrix already satisfy the properties.
Example 2:
Input: grid = [[1,1,1],[0,0,0]]
Output: 3
Explanation:
The matrix becomes [[1,0,1],[1,0,1]] which satisfies the properties, by doing these 3 operations:
grid[1][0] to 1.grid[0][1] to 0.grid[1][2] to 1.Example 3:
Input: grid = [[1],[2],[3]]
Output: 2
Explanation:
There is a single column. We can change the value to 1 in each cell using 2 operations.
Constraints:
1 <= n, m <= 10000 <= grid[i][j] <= 9Problem summary: You are given a 2D matrix grid of size m x n. In one operation, you can change the value of any cell to any non-negative number. You need to perform some operations such that each cell grid[i][j] is: Equal to the cell below it, i.e. grid[i][j] == grid[i + 1][j] (if it exists). Different from the cell to its right, i.e. grid[i][j] != grid[i][j + 1] (if it exists). Return the minimum number of operations needed.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Dynamic Programming
[[1,0,2],[1,0,2]]
[[1,1,1],[0,0,0]]
[[1],[2],[3]]
candy)distribute-candies)minimum-cost-of-buying-candies-with-discount)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3122: Minimum Number of Operations to Satisfy Conditions
class Solution {
public int minimumOperations(int[][] grid) {
int m = grid.length, n = grid[0].length;
int[][] f = new int[n][10];
final int inf = 1 << 29;
for (var g : f) {
Arrays.fill(g, inf);
}
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
int[] cnt = new int[10];
for (int j = 0; j < m; ++j) {
++cnt[grid[j][i]];
}
if (i == 0) {
for (int j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
f[i][j] = m - cnt[j];
}
} else {
for (int j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
for (int k = 0; k < 10; ++k) {
if (k != j) {
f[i][j] = Math.min(f[i][j], f[i - 1][k] + m - cnt[j]);
}
}
}
}
}
int ans = inf;
for (int j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
ans = Math.min(ans, f[n - 1][j]);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3122: Minimum Number of Operations to Satisfy Conditions
func minimumOperations(grid [][]int) int {
m, n := len(grid), len(grid[0])
f := make([][]int, n)
for i := range f {
f[i] = make([]int, 10)
for j := range f[i] {
f[i][j] = 1 << 29
}
}
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
cnt := [10]int{}
for j := 0; j < m; j++ {
cnt[grid[j][i]]++
}
if i == 0 {
for j := 0; j < 10; j++ {
f[i][j] = m - cnt[j]
}
} else {
for j := 0; j < 10; j++ {
for k := 0; k < 10; k++ {
if j != k {
f[i][j] = min(f[i][j], f[i-1][k]+m-cnt[j])
}
}
}
}
}
return slices.Min(f[n-1])
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3122: Minimum Number of Operations to Satisfy Conditions
class Solution:
def minimumOperations(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> int:
m, n = len(grid), len(grid[0])
f = [[inf] * 10 for _ in range(n)]
for i in range(n):
cnt = [0] * 10
for j in range(m):
cnt[grid[j][i]] += 1
if i == 0:
for j in range(10):
f[i][j] = m - cnt[j]
else:
for j in range(10):
for k in range(10):
if k != j:
f[i][j] = min(f[i][j], f[i - 1][k] + m - cnt[j])
return min(f[-1])
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3122: Minimum Number of Operations to Satisfy Conditions
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3122: Minimum Number of Operations to Satisfy Conditions
// class Solution {
// public int minimumOperations(int[][] grid) {
// int m = grid.length, n = grid[0].length;
// int[][] f = new int[n][10];
// final int inf = 1 << 29;
// for (var g : f) {
// Arrays.fill(g, inf);
// }
// for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
// int[] cnt = new int[10];
// for (int j = 0; j < m; ++j) {
// ++cnt[grid[j][i]];
// }
// if (i == 0) {
// for (int j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
// f[i][j] = m - cnt[j];
// }
// } else {
// for (int j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
// for (int k = 0; k < 10; ++k) {
// if (k != j) {
// f[i][j] = Math.min(f[i][j], f[i - 1][k] + m - cnt[j]);
// }
// }
// }
// }
// }
// int ans = inf;
// for (int j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
// ans = Math.min(ans, f[n - 1][j]);
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3122: Minimum Number of Operations to Satisfy Conditions
function minimumOperations(grid: number[][]): number {
const m = grid.length;
const n = grid[0].length;
const f: number[][] = Array.from({ length: n }, () =>
Array.from({ length: 10 }, () => Infinity),
);
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
const cnt: number[] = Array(10).fill(0);
for (let j = 0; j < m; ++j) {
cnt[grid[j][i]]++;
}
if (i === 0) {
for (let j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
f[i][j] = m - cnt[j];
}
} else {
for (let j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
for (let k = 0; k < 10; ++k) {
if (j !== k) {
f[i][j] = Math.min(f[i][j], f[i - 1][k] + m - cnt[j]);
}
}
}
}
}
return Math.min(...f[n - 1]);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.