Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
You are given an array of integers nums with length n, and a positive odd integer k.
Select exactly k disjoint subarrays sub1, sub2, ..., subk from nums such that the last element of subi appears before the first element of sub{i+1} for all 1 <= i <= k-1. The goal is to maximize their combined strength.
The strength of the selected subarrays is defined as:
strength = k * sum(sub1)- (k - 1) * sum(sub2) + (k - 2) * sum(sub3) - ... - 2 * sum(sub{k-1}) + sum(subk)
where sum(subi) is the sum of the elements in the i-th subarray.
Return the maximum possible strength that can be obtained from selecting exactly k disjoint subarrays from nums.
Note that the chosen subarrays don't need to cover the entire array.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,-1,2], k = 3
Output: 22
Explanation:
The best possible way to select 3 subarrays is: nums[0..2], nums[3..3], and nums[4..4]. The strength is calculated as follows:
strength = 3 * (1 + 2 + 3) - 2 * (-1) + 2 = 22
Example 2:
Input: nums = [12,-2,-2,-2,-2], k = 5
Output: 64
Explanation:
The only possible way to select 5 disjoint subarrays is: nums[0..0], nums[1..1], nums[2..2], nums[3..3], and nums[4..4]. The strength is calculated as follows:
strength = 5 * 12 - 4 * (-2) + 3 * (-2) - 2 * (-2) + (-2) = 64
Example 3:
Input: nums = [-1,-2,-3], k = 1
Output: -1
Explanation:
The best possible way to select 1 subarray is: nums[0..0]. The strength is -1.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 104-109 <= nums[i] <= 1091 <= k <= n1 <= n * k <= 106k is odd.Problem summary: You are given an array of integers nums with length n, and a positive odd integer k. Select exactly k disjoint subarrays sub1, sub2, ..., subk from nums such that the last element of subi appears before the first element of sub{i+1} for all 1 <= i <= k-1. The goal is to maximize their combined strength. The strength of the selected subarrays is defined as: strength = k * sum(sub1)- (k - 1) * sum(sub2) + (k - 2) * sum(sub3) - ... - 2 * sum(sub{k-1}) + sum(subk) where sum(subi) is the sum of the elements in the i-th subarray. Return the maximum possible strength that can be obtained from selecting exactly k disjoint subarrays from nums. Note that the chosen subarrays don't need to cover the entire array.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Dynamic Programming
[1,2,3,-1,2] 3
[12,-2,-2,-2,-2] 5
[-1,-2,-3] 1
partition-array-into-disjoint-intervals)maximum-strength-of-a-group)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3077: Maximum Strength of K Disjoint Subarrays
class Solution {
public long maximumStrength(int[] nums, int k) {
int n = nums.length;
long[][][] f = new long[n + 1][k + 1][2];
for (int i = 0; i <= n; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j <= k; j++) {
Arrays.fill(f[i][j], Long.MIN_VALUE / 2);
}
}
f[0][0][0] = 0;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
int x = nums[i - 1];
for (int j = 0; j <= k; j++) {
long sign = (j & 1) == 1 ? 1 : -1;
long val = sign * x * (k - j + 1);
f[i][j][0] = Math.max(f[i - 1][j][0], f[i - 1][j][1]);
f[i][j][1] = Math.max(f[i][j][1], f[i - 1][j][1] + val);
if (j > 0) {
long t = Math.max(f[i - 1][j - 1][0], f[i - 1][j - 1][1]) + val;
f[i][j][1] = Math.max(f[i][j][1], t);
}
}
}
return Math.max(f[n][k][0], f[n][k][1]);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3077: Maximum Strength of K Disjoint Subarrays
func maximumStrength(nums []int, k int) int64 {
n := len(nums)
f := make([][][]int64, n+1)
const inf int64 = math.MinInt64 / 2
for i := range f {
f[i] = make([][]int64, k+1)
for j := range f[i] {
f[i][j] = []int64{inf, inf}
}
}
f[0][0][0] = 0
for i := 1; i <= n; i++ {
x := nums[i-1]
for j := 0; j <= k; j++ {
sign := int64(-1)
if j&1 == 1 {
sign = 1
}
val := sign * int64(x) * int64(k-j+1)
f[i][j][0] = max(f[i-1][j][0], f[i-1][j][1])
f[i][j][1] = max(f[i][j][1], f[i-1][j][1]+val)
if j > 0 {
t := max(f[i-1][j-1][0], f[i-1][j-1][1]) + val
f[i][j][1] = max(f[i][j][1], t)
}
}
}
return max(f[n][k][0], f[n][k][1])
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3077: Maximum Strength of K Disjoint Subarrays
class Solution:
def maximumStrength(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int:
n = len(nums)
f = [[[-inf, -inf] for _ in range(k + 1)] for _ in range(n + 1)]
f[0][0][0] = 0
for i, x in enumerate(nums, 1):
for j in range(k + 1):
sign = 1 if j & 1 else -1
f[i][j][0] = max(f[i - 1][j][0], f[i - 1][j][1])
f[i][j][1] = max(f[i][j][1], f[i - 1][j][1] + sign * x * (k - j + 1))
if j:
f[i][j][1] = max(
f[i][j][1], max(f[i - 1][j - 1]) + sign * x * (k - j + 1)
)
return max(f[n][k])
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3077: Maximum Strength of K Disjoint Subarrays
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3077: Maximum Strength of K Disjoint Subarrays
// class Solution {
// public long maximumStrength(int[] nums, int k) {
// int n = nums.length;
// long[][][] f = new long[n + 1][k + 1][2];
// for (int i = 0; i <= n; i++) {
// for (int j = 0; j <= k; j++) {
// Arrays.fill(f[i][j], Long.MIN_VALUE / 2);
// }
// }
// f[0][0][0] = 0;
// for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
// int x = nums[i - 1];
// for (int j = 0; j <= k; j++) {
// long sign = (j & 1) == 1 ? 1 : -1;
// long val = sign * x * (k - j + 1);
// f[i][j][0] = Math.max(f[i - 1][j][0], f[i - 1][j][1]);
// f[i][j][1] = Math.max(f[i][j][1], f[i - 1][j][1] + val);
// if (j > 0) {
// long t = Math.max(f[i - 1][j - 1][0], f[i - 1][j - 1][1]) + val;
// f[i][j][1] = Math.max(f[i][j][1], t);
// }
// }
// }
// return Math.max(f[n][k][0], f[n][k][1]);
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3077: Maximum Strength of K Disjoint Subarrays
function maximumStrength(nums: number[], k: number): number {
const n: number = nums.length;
const f: number[][][] = Array.from({ length: n + 1 }, () =>
Array.from({ length: k + 1 }, () => [-Infinity, -Infinity]),
);
f[0][0][0] = 0;
for (let i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
const x: number = nums[i - 1];
for (let j = 0; j <= k; j++) {
const sign: number = (j & 1) === 1 ? 1 : -1;
const val: number = sign * x * (k - j + 1);
f[i][j][0] = Math.max(f[i - 1][j][0], f[i - 1][j][1]);
f[i][j][1] = Math.max(f[i][j][1], f[i - 1][j][1] + val);
if (j > 0) {
f[i][j][1] = Math.max(f[i][j][1], Math.max(...f[i - 1][j - 1]) + val);
}
}
}
return Math.max(...f[n][k]);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.