Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
You are given a 0-indexed array nums consisting of positive integers.
Initially, you can increase the value of any element in the array by at most 1.
After that, you need to select one or more elements from the final array such that those elements are consecutive when sorted in increasing order. For example, the elements [3, 4, 5] are consecutive while [3, 4, 6] and [1, 1, 2, 3] are not.
Return the maximum number of elements that you can select.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [2,1,5,1,1] Output: 3 Explanation: We can increase the elements at indices 0 and 3. The resulting array is nums = [3,1,5,2,1]. We select the elements [3,1,5,2,1] and we sort them to obtain [1,2,3], which are consecutive. It can be shown that we cannot select more than 3 consecutive elements.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,4,7,10] Output: 1 Explanation: The maximum consecutive elements that we can select is 1.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1051 <= nums[i] <= 106Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed array nums consisting of positive integers. Initially, you can increase the value of any element in the array by at most 1. After that, you need to select one or more elements from the final array such that those elements are consecutive when sorted in increasing order. For example, the elements [3, 4, 5] are consecutive while [3, 4, 6] and [1, 1, 2, 3] are not. Return the maximum number of elements that you can select.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Dynamic Programming
[2,1,5,1,1]
[1,4,7,10]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3041: Maximize Consecutive Elements in an Array After Modification
class Solution {
public int maxSelectedElements(int[] nums) {
int ans = 0;
// {num: the length of the longest consecutive elements ending in num}
HashMap<Integer, Integer> dp = new HashMap<>();
Arrays.sort(nums);
for (final int num : nums) {
dp.put(num + 1, dp.getOrDefault(num, 0) + 1);
dp.put(num, dp.getOrDefault(num - 1, 0) + 1);
ans = Math.max(ans, Math.max(dp.get(num), dp.get(num + 1)));
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3041: Maximize Consecutive Elements in an Array After Modification
package main
import (
"slices"
)
// https://space.bilibili.com/206214
func maxSelectedElements(nums []int) (ans int) {
slices.Sort(nums)
f := map[int]int{}
for _, x := range nums {
f[x+1] = f[x] + 1
f[x] = f[x-1] + 1
}
for _, res := range f {
ans = max(ans, res)
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3041: Maximize Consecutive Elements in an Array After Modification
class Solution:
def maxSelectedElements(self, nums: list[int]) -> int:
ans = 0
# {num: the length of the longest consecutive elements ending in num}
dp = {}
for num in sorted(nums):
dp[num + 1] = dp.get(num, 0) + 1
dp[num] = dp.get(num - 1, 0) + 1
ans = max(ans, dp[num], dp[num + 1])
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3041: Maximize Consecutive Elements in an Array After Modification
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3041: Maximize Consecutive Elements in an Array After Modification
// class Solution {
// public int maxSelectedElements(int[] nums) {
// int ans = 0;
// // {num: the length of the longest consecutive elements ending in num}
// HashMap<Integer, Integer> dp = new HashMap<>();
//
// Arrays.sort(nums);
//
// for (final int num : nums) {
// dp.put(num + 1, dp.getOrDefault(num, 0) + 1);
// dp.put(num, dp.getOrDefault(num - 1, 0) + 1);
// ans = Math.max(ans, Math.max(dp.get(num), dp.get(num + 1)));
// }
//
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3041: Maximize Consecutive Elements in an Array After Modification
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3041: Maximize Consecutive Elements in an Array After Modification
// class Solution {
// public int maxSelectedElements(int[] nums) {
// int ans = 0;
// // {num: the length of the longest consecutive elements ending in num}
// HashMap<Integer, Integer> dp = new HashMap<>();
//
// Arrays.sort(nums);
//
// for (final int num : nums) {
// dp.put(num + 1, dp.getOrDefault(num, 0) + 1);
// dp.put(num, dp.getOrDefault(num - 1, 0) + 1);
// ans = Math.max(ans, Math.max(dp.get(num), dp.get(num + 1)));
// }
//
// return ans;
// }
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.