Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given an array nums consisting of positive integers.
Return the total frequencies of elements in nums such that those elements all have the maximum frequency.
The frequency of an element is the number of occurrences of that element in the array.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,2,3,1,4] Output: 4 Explanation: The elements 1 and 2 have a frequency of 2 which is the maximum frequency in the array. So the number of elements in the array with maximum frequency is 4.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4,5] Output: 5 Explanation: All elements of the array have a frequency of 1 which is the maximum. So the number of elements in the array with maximum frequency is 5.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1001 <= nums[i] <= 100Problem summary: You are given an array nums consisting of positive integers. Return the total frequencies of elements in nums such that those elements all have the maximum frequency. The frequency of an element is the number of occurrences of that element in the array.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map
[1,2,2,3,1,4]
[1,2,3,4,5]
maximum-frequency-of-an-element-after-performing-operations-i)maximum-frequency-of-an-element-after-performing-operations-ii)maximum-difference-between-even-and-odd-frequency-ii)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3005: Count Elements With Maximum Frequency
class Solution {
public int maxFrequencyElements(int[] nums) {
int[] cnt = new int[101];
for (int x : nums) {
++cnt[x];
}
int ans = 0, mx = -1;
for (int x : cnt) {
if (mx < x) {
mx = x;
ans = x;
} else if (mx == x) {
ans += x;
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3005: Count Elements With Maximum Frequency
func maxFrequencyElements(nums []int) (ans int) {
cnt := [101]int{}
for _, x := range nums {
cnt[x]++
}
mx := -1
for _, x := range cnt {
if mx < x {
mx, ans = x, x
} else if mx == x {
ans += x
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3005: Count Elements With Maximum Frequency
class Solution:
def maxFrequencyElements(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
cnt = Counter(nums)
mx = max(cnt.values())
return sum(x for x in cnt.values() if x == mx)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3005: Count Elements With Maximum Frequency
impl Solution {
pub fn max_frequency_elements(nums: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let mut cnt = [0; 101];
for &x in &nums {
cnt[x as usize] += 1;
}
let mut ans = 0;
let mut mx = -1;
for &x in &cnt {
if mx < x {
mx = x;
ans = x;
} else if mx == x {
ans += x;
}
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3005: Count Elements With Maximum Frequency
function maxFrequencyElements(nums: number[]): number {
const cnt: number[] = Array(101).fill(0);
for (const x of nums) {
++cnt[x];
}
let [ans, mx] = [0, -1];
for (const x of cnt) {
if (mx < x) {
mx = x;
ans = x;
} else if (mx === x) {
ans += x;
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.