Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
There is a company with n branches across the country, some of which are connected by roads. Initially, all branches are reachable from each other by traveling some roads.
The company has realized that they are spending an excessive amount of time traveling between their branches. As a result, they have decided to close down some of these branches (possibly none). However, they want to ensure that the remaining branches have a distance of at most maxDistance from each other.
The distance between two branches is the minimum total traveled length needed to reach one branch from another.
You are given integers n, maxDistance, and a 0-indexed 2D array roads, where roads[i] = [ui, vi, wi] represents the undirected road between branches ui and vi with length wi.
Return the number of possible sets of closing branches, so that any branch has a distance of at most maxDistance from any other.
Note that, after closing a branch, the company will no longer have access to any roads connected to it.
Note that, multiple roads are allowed.
Example 1:
Input: n = 3, maxDistance = 5, roads = [[0,1,2],[1,2,10],[0,2,10]] Output: 5 Explanation: The possible sets of closing branches are: - The set [2], after closing, active branches are [0,1] and they are reachable to each other within distance 2. - The set [0,1], after closing, the active branch is [2]. - The set [1,2], after closing, the active branch is [0]. - The set [0,2], after closing, the active branch is [1]. - The set [0,1,2], after closing, there are no active branches. It can be proven, that there are only 5 possible sets of closing branches.
Example 2:
Input: n = 3, maxDistance = 5, roads = [[0,1,20],[0,1,10],[1,2,2],[0,2,2]] Output: 7 Explanation: The possible sets of closing branches are: - The set [], after closing, active branches are [0,1,2] and they are reachable to each other within distance 4. - The set [0], after closing, active branches are [1,2] and they are reachable to each other within distance 2. - The set [1], after closing, active branches are [0,2] and they are reachable to each other within distance 2. - The set [0,1], after closing, the active branch is [2]. - The set [1,2], after closing, the active branch is [0]. - The set [0,2], after closing, the active branch is [1]. - The set [0,1,2], after closing, there are no active branches. It can be proven, that there are only 7 possible sets of closing branches.
Example 3:
Input: n = 1, maxDistance = 10, roads = [] Output: 2 Explanation: The possible sets of closing branches are: - The set [], after closing, the active branch is [0]. - The set [0], after closing, there are no active branches. It can be proven, that there are only 2 possible sets of closing branches.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 101 <= maxDistance <= 1050 <= roads.length <= 1000roads[i].length == 30 <= ui, vi <= n - 1ui != vi1 <= wi <= 1000Problem summary: There is a company with n branches across the country, some of which are connected by roads. Initially, all branches are reachable from each other by traveling some roads. The company has realized that they are spending an excessive amount of time traveling between their branches. As a result, they have decided to close down some of these branches (possibly none). However, they want to ensure that the remaining branches have a distance of at most maxDistance from each other. The distance between two branches is the minimum total traveled length needed to reach one branch from another. You are given integers n, maxDistance, and a 0-indexed 2D array roads, where roads[i] = [ui, vi, wi] represents the undirected road between branches ui and vi with length wi. Return the number of possible sets of closing branches, so that any branch has a distance of at most maxDistance from any other.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Bit Manipulation
3 5 [[0,1,2],[1,2,10],[0,2,10]]
3 5 [[0,1,20],[0,1,10],[1,2,2],[0,2,2]]
1 10 []
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2959: Number of Possible Sets of Closing Branches
class Solution {
public int numberOfSets(int n, int maxDistance, int[][] roads) {
int ans = 0;
for (int mask = 0; mask < 1 << n; ++mask) {
int[][] g = new int[n][n];
for (var e : g) {
Arrays.fill(e, 1 << 29);
}
for (var e : roads) {
int u = e[0], v = e[1], w = e[2];
if ((mask >> u & 1) == 1 && (mask >> v & 1) == 1) {
g[u][v] = Math.min(g[u][v], w);
g[v][u] = Math.min(g[v][u], w);
}
}
for (int k = 0; k < n; ++k) {
if ((mask >> k & 1) == 1) {
g[k][k] = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
g[i][j] = Math.min(g[i][j], g[i][k] + g[k][j]);
}
}
}
}
int ok = 1;
for (int i = 0; i < n && ok == 1; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < n && ok == 1; ++j) {
if ((mask >> i & 1) == 1 && (mask >> j & 1) == 1) {
if (g[i][j] > maxDistance) {
ok = 0;
}
}
}
}
ans += ok;
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2959: Number of Possible Sets of Closing Branches
func numberOfSets(n int, maxDistance int, roads [][]int) (ans int) {
for mask := 0; mask < 1<<n; mask++ {
g := make([][]int, n)
for i := range g {
g[i] = make([]int, n)
for j := range g[i] {
g[i][j] = 1 << 29
}
}
for _, e := range roads {
u, v, w := e[0], e[1], e[2]
if mask>>u&1 == 1 && mask>>v&1 == 1 {
g[u][v] = min(g[u][v], w)
g[v][u] = min(g[v][u], w)
}
}
for k := 0; k < n; k++ {
if mask>>k&1 == 1 {
g[k][k] = 0
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
for j := 0; j < n; j++ {
g[i][j] = min(g[i][j], g[i][k]+g[k][j])
}
}
}
}
ok := 1
for i := 0; i < n && ok == 1; i++ {
for j := 0; j < n && ok == 1; j++ {
if mask>>i&1 == 1 && mask>>j&1 == 1 && g[i][j] > maxDistance {
ok = 0
}
}
}
ans += ok
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2959: Number of Possible Sets of Closing Branches
class Solution:
def numberOfSets(self, n: int, maxDistance: int, roads: List[List[int]]) -> int:
ans = 0
for mask in range(1 << n):
g = [[inf] * n for _ in range(n)]
for u, v, w in roads:
if mask >> u & 1 and mask >> v & 1:
g[u][v] = min(g[u][v], w)
g[v][u] = min(g[v][u], w)
for k in range(n):
if mask >> k & 1:
g[k][k] = 0
for i in range(n):
for j in range(n):
# g[i][j] = min(g[i][j], g[i][k] + g[k][j])
if g[i][k] + g[k][j] < g[i][j]:
g[i][j] = g[i][k] + g[k][j]
if all(
g[i][j] <= maxDistance
for i in range(n)
for j in range(n)
if mask >> i & 1 and mask >> j & 1
):
ans += 1
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2959: Number of Possible Sets of Closing Branches
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2959: Number of Possible Sets of Closing Branches
// class Solution {
// public int numberOfSets(int n, int maxDistance, int[][] roads) {
// int ans = 0;
// for (int mask = 0; mask < 1 << n; ++mask) {
// int[][] g = new int[n][n];
// for (var e : g) {
// Arrays.fill(e, 1 << 29);
// }
// for (var e : roads) {
// int u = e[0], v = e[1], w = e[2];
// if ((mask >> u & 1) == 1 && (mask >> v & 1) == 1) {
// g[u][v] = Math.min(g[u][v], w);
// g[v][u] = Math.min(g[v][u], w);
// }
// }
// for (int k = 0; k < n; ++k) {
// if ((mask >> k & 1) == 1) {
// g[k][k] = 0;
// for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
// for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
// g[i][j] = Math.min(g[i][j], g[i][k] + g[k][j]);
// }
// }
// }
// }
// int ok = 1;
// for (int i = 0; i < n && ok == 1; ++i) {
// for (int j = 0; j < n && ok == 1; ++j) {
// if ((mask >> i & 1) == 1 && (mask >> j & 1) == 1) {
// if (g[i][j] > maxDistance) {
// ok = 0;
// }
// }
// }
// }
// ans += ok;
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2959: Number of Possible Sets of Closing Branches
function numberOfSets(n: number, maxDistance: number, roads: number[][]): number {
let ans = 0;
for (let mask = 0; mask < 1 << n; ++mask) {
const g: number[][] = Array.from({ length: n }, () => Array(n).fill(Infinity));
for (const [u, v, w] of roads) {
if ((mask >> u) & 1 && (mask >> v) & 1) {
g[u][v] = Math.min(g[u][v], w);
g[v][u] = Math.min(g[v][u], w);
}
}
for (let k = 0; k < n; ++k) {
if ((mask >> k) & 1) {
g[k][k] = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
for (let j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
g[i][j] = Math.min(g[i][j], g[i][k] + g[k][j]);
}
}
}
}
let ok = 1;
for (let i = 0; i < n && ok; ++i) {
for (let j = 0; j < n && ok; ++j) {
if ((mask >> i) & 1 && (mask >> j) & 1 && g[i][j] > maxDistance) {
ok = 0;
}
}
}
ans += ok;
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Sort the array in O(n log n), then scan for the missing or unique element by comparing adjacent pairs. Sorting requires O(n) auxiliary space (or O(1) with in-place sort but O(n log n) time remains). The sort step dominates.
Bitwise operations (AND, OR, XOR, shifts) are O(1) per operation on fixed-width integers. A single pass through the input with bit operations gives O(n) time. The key insight: XOR of a number with itself is 0, which eliminates duplicates without extra space.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.