LeetCode #2930 — MEDIUM

Number of Strings Which Can Be Rearranged to Contain Substring

Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using math strategy.

Solve on LeetCode
The Problem

Problem Statement

You are given an integer n.

A string s is called good if it contains only lowercase English characters and it is possible to rearrange the characters of s such that the new string contains "leet" as a substring.

For example:

  • The string "lteer" is good because we can rearrange it to form "leetr" .
  • "letl" is not good because we cannot rearrange it to contain "leet" as a substring.

Return the total number of good strings of length n.

Since the answer may be large, return it modulo 109 + 7.

A substring is a contiguous sequence of characters within a string.

 

Example 1:

Input: n = 4
Output: 12
Explanation: The 12 strings which can be rearranged to have "leet" as a substring are: "eelt", "eetl", "elet", "elte", "etel", "etle", "leet", "lete", "ltee", "teel", "tele", and "tlee".

Example 2:

Input: n = 10
Output: 83943898
Explanation: The number of strings with length 10 which can be rearranged to have "leet" as a substring is 526083947580. Hence the answer is 526083947580 % (109 + 7) = 83943898.

Constraints:

  • 1 <= n <= 105
Patterns Used

Roadmap

  1. Brute Force Baseline
  2. Core Insight
  3. Algorithm Walkthrough
  4. Edge Cases
  5. Full Annotated Code
  6. Interactive Study Demo
  7. Complexity Analysis
Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: You are given an integer n. A string s is called good if it contains only lowercase English characters and it is possible to rearrange the characters of s such that the new string contains "leet" as a substring. For example: The string "lteer" is good because we can rearrange it to form "leetr" . "letl" is not good because we cannot rearrange it to contain "leet" as a substring. Return the total number of good strings of length n. Since the answer may be large, return it modulo 109 + 7. A substring is a contiguous sequence of characters within a string.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Math · Dynamic Programming

Example 1

4

Example 2

10

Related Problems

  • Count Vowels Permutation (count-vowels-permutation)
Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

  • A good string must contain at least one <code>l</code>, one <code>t</code>, and two <code>e</code>.
  • Divide the problem into subproblems and use Dynamic Programming.
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

  1. Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
  2. Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
  3. Record answer candidate when condition is met.
  4. Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Upper-end input sizes
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2930: Number of Strings Which Can Be Rearranged to Contain Substring
class Solution {
    private final int mod = (int) 1e9 + 7;
    private Long[][][][] f;

    public int stringCount(int n) {
        f = new Long[n + 1][2][3][2];
        return (int) dfs(n, 0, 0, 0);
    }

    private long dfs(int i, int l, int e, int t) {
        if (i == 0) {
            return l == 1 && e == 2 && t == 1 ? 1 : 0;
        }
        if (f[i][l][e][t] != null) {
            return f[i][l][e][t];
        }
        long a = dfs(i - 1, l, e, t) * 23 % mod;
        long b = dfs(i - 1, Math.min(1, l + 1), e, t);
        long c = dfs(i - 1, l, Math.min(2, e + 1), t);
        long d = dfs(i - 1, l, e, Math.min(1, t + 1));
        return f[i][l][e][t] = (a + b + c + d) % mod;
    }
}
Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time
O(n)
Space
O(n)

Approach Breakdown

RECURSIVE
O(2ⁿ) time
O(n) space

Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.

DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
O(n × m) time
O(n × m) space

Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.

Shortcut: Count your DP state dimensions → that’s your time. Can you drop one? That’s your space optimization.
Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Overflow in intermediate arithmetic

Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.

Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.

Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.

State misses one required dimension

Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.

Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.

Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.