Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
You are given a 0-indexed array nums consisting of non-negative powers of 2, and an integer target.
In one operation, you must apply the following changes to the array:
nums[i] such that nums[i] > 1.nums[i] from the array.nums[i] / 2 to the end of nums.Return the minimum number of operations you need to perform so that nums contains a subsequence whose elements sum to target. If it is impossible to obtain such a subsequence, return -1.
A subsequence is an array that can be derived from another array by deleting some or no elements without changing the order of the remaining elements.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,8], target = 7 Output: 1 Explanation: In the first operation, we choose element nums[2]. The array becomes equal to nums = [1,2,4,4]. At this stage, nums contains the subsequence [1,2,4] which sums up to 7. It can be shown that there is no shorter sequence of operations that results in a subsequnce that sums up to 7.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,32,1,2], target = 12 Output: 2 Explanation: In the first operation, we choose element nums[1]. The array becomes equal to nums = [1,1,2,16,16]. In the second operation, we choose element nums[3]. The array becomes equal to nums = [1,1,2,16,8,8] At this stage, nums contains the subsequence [1,1,2,8] which sums up to 12. It can be shown that there is no shorter sequence of operations that results in a subsequence that sums up to 12.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [1,32,1], target = 35 Output: -1 Explanation: It can be shown that no sequence of operations results in a subsequence that sums up to 35.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 10001 <= nums[i] <= 230nums consists only of non-negative powers of two.1 <= target < 231Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed array nums consisting of non-negative powers of 2, and an integer target. In one operation, you must apply the following changes to the array: Choose any element of the array nums[i] such that nums[i] > 1. Remove nums[i] from the array. Add two occurrences of nums[i] / 2 to the end of nums. Return the minimum number of operations you need to perform so that nums contains a subsequence whose elements sum to target. If it is impossible to obtain such a subsequence, return -1. A subsequence is an array that can be derived from another array by deleting some or no elements without changing the order of the remaining elements.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Greedy · Bit Manipulation
[1,2,8] 7
[1,32,1,2] 12
[1,32,1] 35
number-of-subsequences-that-satisfy-the-given-sum-condition)closest-subsequence-sum)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2835: Minimum Operations to Form Subsequence With Target Sum
class Solution {
public int minOperations(List<Integer> nums, int target) {
long s = 0;
int[] cnt = new int[32];
for (int x : nums) {
s += x;
for (int i = 0; i < 32; ++i) {
if ((x >> i & 1) == 1) {
++cnt[i];
}
}
}
if (s < target) {
return -1;
}
int i = 0, j = 0;
int ans = 0;
while (true) {
while (i < 32 && (target >> i & 1) == 0) {
++i;
}
if (i == 32) {
return ans;
}
while (j < i) {
cnt[j + 1] += cnt[j] / 2;
cnt[j] %= 2;
++j;
}
while (cnt[j] == 0) {
cnt[j] = 1;
++j;
}
ans += j - i;
--cnt[j];
j = i;
++i;
}
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2835: Minimum Operations to Form Subsequence With Target Sum
func minOperations(nums []int, target int) (ans int) {
s := 0
cnt := [32]int{}
for _, x := range nums {
s += x
for i := 0; i < 32; i++ {
if x>>i&1 > 0 {
cnt[i]++
}
}
}
if s < target {
return -1
}
var i, j int
for {
for i < 32 && target>>i&1 == 0 {
i++
}
if i == 32 {
return
}
for j < i {
cnt[j+1] += cnt[j] >> 1
cnt[j] %= 2
j++
}
for cnt[j] == 0 {
cnt[j] = 1
j++
}
ans += j - i
cnt[j]--
j = i
i++
}
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2835: Minimum Operations to Form Subsequence With Target Sum
class Solution:
def minOperations(self, nums: List[int], target: int) -> int:
s = sum(nums)
if s < target:
return -1
cnt = [0] * 32
for x in nums:
for i in range(32):
if x >> i & 1:
cnt[i] += 1
i = j = 0
ans = 0
while 1:
while i < 32 and (target >> i & 1) == 0:
i += 1
if i == 32:
break
while j < i:
cnt[j + 1] += cnt[j] // 2
cnt[j] %= 2
j += 1
while cnt[j] == 0:
cnt[j] = 1
j += 1
ans += j - i
cnt[j] -= 1
j = i
i += 1
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2835: Minimum Operations to Form Subsequence With Target Sum
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2835: Minimum Operations to Form Subsequence With Target Sum
// class Solution {
// public int minOperations(List<Integer> nums, int target) {
// long s = 0;
// int[] cnt = new int[32];
// for (int x : nums) {
// s += x;
// for (int i = 0; i < 32; ++i) {
// if ((x >> i & 1) == 1) {
// ++cnt[i];
// }
// }
// }
// if (s < target) {
// return -1;
// }
// int i = 0, j = 0;
// int ans = 0;
// while (true) {
// while (i < 32 && (target >> i & 1) == 0) {
// ++i;
// }
// if (i == 32) {
// return ans;
// }
// while (j < i) {
// cnt[j + 1] += cnt[j] / 2;
// cnt[j] %= 2;
// ++j;
// }
// while (cnt[j] == 0) {
// cnt[j] = 1;
// ++j;
// }
// ans += j - i;
// --cnt[j];
// j = i;
// ++i;
// }
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2835: Minimum Operations to Form Subsequence With Target Sum
function minOperations(nums: number[], target: number): number {
let s = 0;
const cnt: number[] = Array(32).fill(0);
for (const x of nums) {
s += x;
for (let i = 0; i < 32; ++i) {
if ((x >> i) & 1) {
++cnt[i];
}
}
}
if (s < target) {
return -1;
}
let [ans, i, j] = [0, 0, 0];
while (1) {
while (i < 32 && ((target >> i) & 1) === 0) {
++i;
}
if (i === 32) {
return ans;
}
while (j < i) {
cnt[j + 1] += cnt[j] >> 1;
cnt[j] %= 2;
++j;
}
while (cnt[j] == 0) {
cnt[j] = 1;
j++;
}
ans += j - i;
cnt[j]--;
j = i;
i++;
}
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Try every possible combination of choices. With n items each having two states (include/exclude), the search space is 2ⁿ. Evaluating each combination takes O(n), giving O(n × 2ⁿ). The recursion stack or subset storage uses O(n) space.
Greedy algorithms typically sort the input (O(n log n)) then make a single pass (O(n)). The sort dominates. If the input is already sorted or the greedy choice can be computed without sorting, time drops to O(n). Proving greedy correctness (exchange argument) is harder than the implementation.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.
Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.
Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.