Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
Given an array of integers citations where citations[i] is the number of citations a researcher received for their ith paper and citations is sorted in non-descending order, return the researcher's h-index.
According to the definition of h-index on Wikipedia: The h-index is defined as the maximum value of h such that the given researcher has published at least h papers that have each been cited at least h times.
You must write an algorithm that runs in logarithmic time.
Example 1:
Input: citations = [0,1,3,5,6] Output: 3 Explanation: [0,1,3,5,6] means the researcher has 5 papers in total and each of them had received 0, 1, 3, 5, 6 citations respectively. Since the researcher has 3 papers with at least 3 citations each and the remaining two with no more than 3 citations each, their h-index is 3.
Example 2:
Input: citations = [1,2,100] Output: 2
Constraints:
n == citations.length1 <= n <= 1050 <= citations[i] <= 1000citations is sorted in ascending order.Problem summary: Given an array of integers citations where citations[i] is the number of citations a researcher received for their ith paper and citations is sorted in non-descending order, return the researcher's h-index. According to the definition of h-index on Wikipedia: The h-index is defined as the maximum value of h such that the given researcher has published at least h papers that have each been cited at least h times. You must write an algorithm that runs in logarithmic time.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Binary Search
[0,1,3,5,6]
[1,2,100]
h-index)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #275: H-Index II
class Solution {
public int hIndex(int[] citations) {
int n = citations.length;
int left = 0, right = n;
while (left < right) {
int mid = (left + right) >>> 1;
if (citations[mid] >= n - mid) {
right = mid;
} else {
left = mid + 1;
}
}
return n - left;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #275: H-Index II
func hIndex(citations []int) int {
n := len(citations)
left, right := 0, n
for left < right {
mid := (left + right + 1) >> 1
if citations[n-mid] >= mid {
left = mid
} else {
right = mid - 1
}
}
return left
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #275: H-Index II
class Solution:
def hIndex(self, citations: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(citations)
left, right = 0, n
while left < right:
mid = (left + right + 1) >> 1
if citations[n - mid] >= mid:
left = mid
else:
right = mid - 1
return left
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #275: H-Index II
impl Solution {
pub fn h_index(citations: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let n = citations.len();
let (mut left, mut right) = (0, n);
while left < right {
let mid = ((left + right + 1) >> 1) as usize;
if citations[n - mid] >= (mid as i32) {
left = mid;
} else {
right = mid - 1;
}
}
left as i32
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #275: H-Index II
function hIndex(citations: number[]): number {
const n = citations.length;
let left = 0,
right = n;
while (left < right) {
const mid = (left + right + 1) >> 1;
if (citations[n - mid] >= mid) {
left = mid;
} else {
right = mid - 1;
}
}
return left;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Check every element from left to right until we find the target or exhaust the array. Each comparison is O(1), and we may visit all n elements, giving O(n). No extra space needed.
Each comparison eliminates half the remaining search space. After k comparisons, the space is n/2ᵏ. We stop when the space is 1, so k = log₂ n. No extra memory needed — just two pointers (lo, hi).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Setting `lo = mid` or `hi = mid` can stall and create an infinite loop.
Usually fails on: Two-element ranges never converge.
Fix: Use `lo = mid + 1` or `hi = mid - 1` where appropriate.