Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
You are given an integer array nums containing distinct numbers, and you can perform the following operations until the array is empty:
Return an integer denoting the number of operations it takes to make nums empty.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [3,4,-1] Output: 5
| Operation | Array |
|---|---|
| 1 | [4, -1, 3] |
| 2 | [-1, 3, 4] |
| 3 | [3, 4] |
| 4 | [4] |
| 5 | [] |
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,2,4,3] Output: 5
| Operation | Array |
|---|---|
| 1 | [2, 4, 3] |
| 2 | [4, 3] |
| 3 | [3, 4] |
| 4 | [4] |
| 5 | [] |
Example 3:
Input: nums = [1,2,3] Output: 3
| Operation | Array |
|---|---|
| 1 | [2, 3] |
| 2 | [3] |
| 3 | [] |
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 105-109 <= nums[i] <= 109nums are distinct.Problem summary: You are given an integer array nums containing distinct numbers, and you can perform the following operations until the array is empty: If the first element has the smallest value, remove it Otherwise, put the first element at the end of the array. Return an integer denoting the number of operations it takes to make nums empty.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Binary Search · Greedy · Segment Tree
[3,4,-1]
[1,2,4,3]
[1,2,3]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2659: Make Array Empty
class BinaryIndexedTree {
private int n;
private int[] c;
public BinaryIndexedTree(int n) {
this.n = n;
c = new int[n + 1];
}
public void update(int x, int delta) {
while (x <= n) {
c[x] += delta;
x += x & -x;
}
}
public int query(int x) {
int s = 0;
while (x > 0) {
s += c[x];
x -= x & -x;
}
return s;
}
}
class Solution {
public long countOperationsToEmptyArray(int[] nums) {
int n = nums.length;
Map<Integer, Integer> pos = new HashMap<>();
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
pos.put(nums[i], i);
}
Arrays.sort(nums);
long ans = pos.get(nums[0]) + 1;
BinaryIndexedTree tree = new BinaryIndexedTree(n);
for (int k = 0; k < n - 1; ++k) {
int i = pos.get(nums[k]), j = pos.get(nums[k + 1]);
long d = j - i - (tree.query(j + 1) - tree.query(i + 1));
ans += d + (n - k) * (i > j ? 1 : 0);
tree.update(i + 1, 1);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2659: Make Array Empty
type BinaryIndexedTree struct {
n int
c []int
}
func newBinaryIndexedTree(n int) *BinaryIndexedTree {
c := make([]int, n+1)
return &BinaryIndexedTree{n, c}
}
func (this *BinaryIndexedTree) update(x, delta int) {
for x <= this.n {
this.c[x] += delta
x += x & -x
}
}
func (this *BinaryIndexedTree) query(x int) int {
s := 0
for x > 0 {
s += this.c[x]
x -= x & -x
}
return s
}
func countOperationsToEmptyArray(nums []int) int64 {
n := len(nums)
pos := map[int]int{}
for i, x := range nums {
pos[x] = i
}
sort.Ints(nums)
tree := newBinaryIndexedTree(n)
ans := pos[nums[0]] + 1
for k := 0; k < n-1; k++ {
i, j := pos[nums[k]], pos[nums[k+1]]
d := j - i - (tree.query(j+1) - tree.query(i+1))
if i > j {
d += n - k
}
ans += d
tree.update(i+1, 1)
}
return int64(ans)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2659: Make Array Empty
class Solution:
def countOperationsToEmptyArray(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
pos = {x: i for i, x in enumerate(nums)}
nums.sort()
sl = SortedList()
ans = pos[nums[0]] + 1
n = len(nums)
for k, (a, b) in enumerate(pairwise(nums)):
i, j = pos[a], pos[b]
d = j - i - sl.bisect(j) + sl.bisect(i)
ans += d + (n - k) * int(i > j)
sl.add(i)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2659: Make Array Empty
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2659: Make Array Empty
// class BinaryIndexedTree {
// private int n;
// private int[] c;
//
// public BinaryIndexedTree(int n) {
// this.n = n;
// c = new int[n + 1];
// }
//
// public void update(int x, int delta) {
// while (x <= n) {
// c[x] += delta;
// x += x & -x;
// }
// }
//
// public int query(int x) {
// int s = 0;
// while (x > 0) {
// s += c[x];
// x -= x & -x;
// }
// return s;
// }
// }
//
// class Solution {
// public long countOperationsToEmptyArray(int[] nums) {
// int n = nums.length;
// Map<Integer, Integer> pos = new HashMap<>();
// for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
// pos.put(nums[i], i);
// }
// Arrays.sort(nums);
// long ans = pos.get(nums[0]) + 1;
// BinaryIndexedTree tree = new BinaryIndexedTree(n);
// for (int k = 0; k < n - 1; ++k) {
// int i = pos.get(nums[k]), j = pos.get(nums[k + 1]);
// long d = j - i - (tree.query(j + 1) - tree.query(i + 1));
// ans += d + (n - k) * (i > j ? 1 : 0);
// tree.update(i + 1, 1);
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2659: Make Array Empty
class BinaryIndexedTree {
private n: number;
private c: number[];
constructor(n: number) {
this.n = n;
this.c = Array(n + 1).fill(0);
}
public update(x: number, v: number): void {
while (x <= this.n) {
this.c[x] += v;
x += x & -x;
}
}
public query(x: number): number {
let s = 0;
while (x > 0) {
s += this.c[x];
x -= x & -x;
}
return s;
}
}
function countOperationsToEmptyArray(nums: number[]): number {
const pos: Map<number, number> = new Map();
const n = nums.length;
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
pos.set(nums[i], i);
}
nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
const tree = new BinaryIndexedTree(n);
let ans = pos.get(nums[0])! + 1;
for (let k = 0; k < n - 1; ++k) {
const i = pos.get(nums[k])!;
const j = pos.get(nums[k + 1])!;
let d = j - i - (tree.query(j + 1) - tree.query(i + 1));
if (i > j) {
d += n - k;
}
ans += d;
tree.update(i + 1, 1);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Check every element from left to right until we find the target or exhaust the array. Each comparison is O(1), and we may visit all n elements, giving O(n). No extra space needed.
Each comparison eliminates half the remaining search space. After k comparisons, the space is n/2ᵏ. We stop when the space is 1, so k = log₂ n. No extra memory needed — just two pointers (lo, hi).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Setting `lo = mid` or `hi = mid` can stall and create an infinite loop.
Usually fails on: Two-element ranges never converge.
Fix: Use `lo = mid + 1` or `hi = mid - 1` where appropriate.
Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.
Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.
Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.