Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
Given an integer array arr and a filtering function fn, return a filtered array filteredArr.
The fn function takes one or two arguments:
arr[i] - number from the arri - index of arr[i]filteredArr should only contain the elements from the arr for which the expression fn(arr[i], i) evaluates to a truthy value. A truthy value is a value where Boolean(value) returns true.
Please solve it without the built-in Array.filter method.
Example 1:
Input: arr = [0,10,20,30], fn = function greaterThan10(n) { return n > 10; }
Output: [20,30]
Explanation:
const newArray = filter(arr, fn); // [20, 30]
The function filters out values that are not greater than 10
Example 2:
Input: arr = [1,2,3], fn = function firstIndex(n, i) { return i === 0; }
Output: [1]
Explanation:
fn can also accept the index of each element
In this case, the function removes elements not at index 0
Example 3:
Input: arr = [-2,-1,0,1,2], fn = function plusOne(n) { return n + 1 }
Output: [-2,0,1,2]
Explanation:
Falsey values such as 0 should be filtered out
Constraints:
0 <= arr.length <= 1000-109 <= arr[i] <= 109Problem summary: Given an integer array arr and a filtering function fn, return a filtered array filteredArr. The fn function takes one or two arguments: arr[i] - number from the arr i - index of arr[i] filteredArr should only contain the elements from the arr for which the expression fn(arr[i], i) evaluates to a truthy value. A truthy value is a value where Boolean(value) returns true. Please solve it without the built-in Array.filter method.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
function greaterThan10(n) { return n > 10; }
[0,10,20,30]function firstIndex(n, i) { return i === 0; }
[1,2,3]function plusOne(n) { return n + 1 }
[-2,-1,0,1,2]group-by)apply-transform-over-each-element-in-array)array-reduce-transformation)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2634: Filter Elements from Array
// Auto-generated Java example from ts.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2634: Filter Elements from Array
// function filter(arr: number[], fn: (n: number, i: number) => any): number[] {
// const ans: number[] = [];
// for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i) {
// if (fn(arr[i], i)) {
// ans.push(arr[i]);
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2634: Filter Elements from Array
// Auto-generated Go example from ts.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2634: Filter Elements from Array
// function filter(arr: number[], fn: (n: number, i: number) => any): number[] {
// const ans: number[] = [];
// for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i) {
// if (fn(arr[i], i)) {
// ans.push(arr[i]);
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2634: Filter Elements from Array
# Auto-generated Python example from ts.
def example_solution() -> None:
return
# Reference (ts):
# // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2634: Filter Elements from Array
# function filter(arr: number[], fn: (n: number, i: number) => any): number[] {
# const ans: number[] = [];
# for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i) {
# if (fn(arr[i], i)) {
# ans.push(arr[i]);
# }
# }
# return ans;
# }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2634: Filter Elements from Array
// Rust example auto-generated from ts reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2634: Filter Elements from Array
// function filter(arr: number[], fn: (n: number, i: number) => any): number[] {
// const ans: number[] = [];
// for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i) {
// if (fn(arr[i], i)) {
// ans.push(arr[i]);
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2634: Filter Elements from Array
function filter(arr: number[], fn: (n: number, i: number) => any): number[] {
const ans: number[] = [];
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i) {
if (fn(arr[i], i)) {
ans.push(arr[i]);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.