Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
Given an array of positive integers nums, return an array answer that consists of the digits of each integer in nums after separating them in the same order they appear in nums.
To separate the digits of an integer is to get all the digits it has in the same order.
10921, the separation of its digits is [1,0,9,2,1].Example 1:
Input: nums = [13,25,83,77] Output: [1,3,2,5,8,3,7,7] Explanation: - The separation of 13 is [1,3]. - The separation of 25 is [2,5]. - The separation of 83 is [8,3]. - The separation of 77 is [7,7]. answer = [1,3,2,5,8,3,7,7]. Note that answer contains the separations in the same order.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [7,1,3,9] Output: [7,1,3,9] Explanation: The separation of each integer in nums is itself. answer = [7,1,3,9].
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 10001 <= nums[i] <= 105Problem summary: Given an array of positive integers nums, return an array answer that consists of the digits of each integer in nums after separating them in the same order they appear in nums. To separate the digits of an integer is to get all the digits it has in the same order. For example, for the integer 10921, the separation of its digits is [1,0,9,2,1].
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[13,25,83,77]
[7,1,3,9]
count-integers-with-even-digit-sum)alternating-digit-sum)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2553: Separate the Digits in an Array
class Solution {
public int[] separateDigits(int[] nums) {
List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
for (int x : nums) {
List<Integer> t = new ArrayList<>();
for (; x > 0; x /= 10) {
t.add(x % 10);
}
Collections.reverse(t);
res.addAll(t);
}
int[] ans = new int[res.size()];
for (int i = 0; i < ans.length; ++i) {
ans[i] = res.get(i);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2553: Separate the Digits in an Array
func separateDigits(nums []int) (ans []int) {
for _, x := range nums {
t := []int{}
for ; x > 0; x /= 10 {
t = append(t, x%10)
}
for i, j := 0, len(t)-1; i < j; i, j = i+1, j-1 {
t[i], t[j] = t[j], t[i]
}
ans = append(ans, t...)
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2553: Separate the Digits in an Array
class Solution:
def separateDigits(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
ans = []
for x in nums:
t = []
while x:
t.append(x % 10)
x //= 10
ans.extend(t[::-1])
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2553: Separate the Digits in an Array
impl Solution {
pub fn separate_digits(nums: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<i32> {
let mut ans = Vec::new();
for &num in nums.iter() {
let mut num = num;
let mut t = Vec::new();
while num != 0 {
t.push(num % 10);
num /= 10;
}
t.into_iter().rev().for_each(|v| ans.push(v));
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2553: Separate the Digits in an Array
function separateDigits(nums: number[]): number[] {
const ans: number[] = [];
for (let num of nums) {
const t: number[] = [];
while (num) {
t.push(num % 10);
num = Math.floor(num / 10);
}
ans.push(...t.reverse());
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.