Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given an m x n matrix grid consisting of positive integers.
Perform the following operation until grid becomes empty:
Note that the number of columns decreases by one after each operation.
Return the answer after performing the operations described above.
Example 1:
Input: grid = [[1,2,4],[3,3,1]] Output: 8 Explanation: The diagram above shows the removed values in each step. - In the first operation, we remove 4 from the first row and 3 from the second row (notice that, there are two cells with value 3 and we can remove any of them). We add 4 to the answer. - In the second operation, we remove 2 from the first row and 3 from the second row. We add 3 to the answer. - In the third operation, we remove 1 from the first row and 1 from the second row. We add 1 to the answer. The final answer = 4 + 3 + 1 = 8.
Example 2:
Input: grid = [[10]] Output: 10 Explanation: The diagram above shows the removed values in each step. - In the first operation, we remove 10 from the first row. We add 10 to the answer. The final answer = 10.
Constraints:
m == grid.lengthn == grid[i].length1 <= m, n <= 501 <= grid[i][j] <= 100Problem summary: You are given an m x n matrix grid consisting of positive integers. Perform the following operation until grid becomes empty: Delete the element with the greatest value from each row. If multiple such elements exist, delete any of them. Add the maximum of deleted elements to the answer. Note that the number of columns decreases by one after each operation. Return the answer after performing the operations described above.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[[1,2,4],[3,3,1]]
[[10]]
equal-row-and-column-pairs)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2500: Delete Greatest Value in Each Row
class Solution {
public int deleteGreatestValue(int[][] grid) {
for (var row : grid) {
Arrays.sort(row);
}
int ans = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < grid[0].length; ++j) {
int t = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < grid.length; ++i) {
t = Math.max(t, grid[i][j]);
}
ans += t;
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2500: Delete Greatest Value in Each Row
func deleteGreatestValue(grid [][]int) (ans int) {
for _, row := range grid {
sort.Ints(row)
}
for j := range grid[0] {
t := 0
for i := range grid {
if t < grid[i][j] {
t = grid[i][j]
}
}
ans += t
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2500: Delete Greatest Value in Each Row
class Solution:
def deleteGreatestValue(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> int:
for row in grid:
row.sort()
return sum(max(col) for col in zip(*grid))
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2500: Delete Greatest Value in Each Row
impl Solution {
pub fn delete_greatest_value(grid: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> i32 {
let mut grid = grid;
for i in 0..grid.len() {
grid[i].sort();
}
let mut ans = 0;
for j in 0..grid[0].len() {
let mut mx = 0;
for i in 0..grid.len() {
if grid[i][j] > mx {
mx = grid[i][j];
}
}
ans += mx;
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2500: Delete Greatest Value in Each Row
function deleteGreatestValue(grid: number[][]): number {
for (const row of grid) {
row.sort((a, b) => a - b);
}
let ans = 0;
for (let j = 0; j < grid[0].length; ++j) {
let t = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < grid.length; ++i) {
t = Math.max(t, grid[i][j]);
}
ans += t;
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.