Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given a positive integer array skill of even length n where skill[i] denotes the skill of the ith player. Divide the players into n / 2 teams of size 2 such that the total skill of each team is equal.
The chemistry of a team is equal to the product of the skills of the players on that team.
Return the sum of the chemistry of all the teams, or return -1 if there is no way to divide the players into teams such that the total skill of each team is equal.
Example 1:
Input: skill = [3,2,5,1,3,4] Output: 22 Explanation: Divide the players into the following teams: (1, 5), (2, 4), (3, 3), where each team has a total skill of 6. The sum of the chemistry of all the teams is: 1 * 5 + 2 * 4 + 3 * 3 = 5 + 8 + 9 = 22.
Example 2:
Input: skill = [3,4] Output: 12 Explanation: The two players form a team with a total skill of 7. The chemistry of the team is 3 * 4 = 12.
Example 3:
Input: skill = [1,1,2,3] Output: -1 Explanation: There is no way to divide the players into teams such that the total skill of each team is equal.
Constraints:
2 <= skill.length <= 105skill.length is even.1 <= skill[i] <= 1000Problem summary: You are given a positive integer array skill of even length n where skill[i] denotes the skill of the ith player. Divide the players into n / 2 teams of size 2 such that the total skill of each team is equal. The chemistry of a team is equal to the product of the skills of the players on that team. Return the sum of the chemistry of all the teams, or return -1 if there is no way to divide the players into teams such that the total skill of each team is equal.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Two Pointers
[3,2,5,1,3,4]
[3,4]
[1,1,2,3]
minimum-moves-to-equal-array-elements)max-number-of-k-sum-pairs)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2491: Divide Players Into Teams of Equal Skill
class Solution {
public long dividePlayers(int[] skill) {
Arrays.sort(skill);
int n = skill.length;
int t = skill[0] + skill[n - 1];
long ans = 0;
for (int i = 0, j = n - 1; i < j; ++i, --j) {
if (skill[i] + skill[j] != t) {
return -1;
}
ans += (long) skill[i] * skill[j];
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2491: Divide Players Into Teams of Equal Skill
func dividePlayers(skill []int) (ans int64) {
sort.Ints(skill)
n := len(skill)
t := skill[0] + skill[n-1]
for i, j := 0, n-1; i < j; i, j = i+1, j-1 {
if skill[i]+skill[j] != t {
return -1
}
ans += int64(skill[i] * skill[j])
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2491: Divide Players Into Teams of Equal Skill
class Solution:
def dividePlayers(self, skill: List[int]) -> int:
skill.sort()
t = skill[0] + skill[-1]
i, j = 0, len(skill) - 1
ans = 0
while i < j:
if skill[i] + skill[j] != t:
return -1
ans += skill[i] * skill[j]
i, j = i + 1, j - 1
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2491: Divide Players Into Teams of Equal Skill
impl Solution {
pub fn divide_players(mut skill: Vec<i32>) -> i64 {
let n = skill.len();
skill.sort();
let target = skill[0] + skill[n - 1];
let mut ans = 0;
for i in 0..n >> 1 {
if skill[i] + skill[n - 1 - i] != target {
return -1;
}
ans += (skill[i] * skill[n - 1 - i]) as i64;
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2491: Divide Players Into Teams of Equal Skill
function dividePlayers(skill: number[]): number {
const n = skill.length;
skill.sort((a, b) => a - b);
const target = skill[0] + skill[n - 1];
let ans = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < n >> 1; i++) {
if (target !== skill[i] + skill[n - 1 - i]) {
return -1;
}
ans += skill[i] * skill[n - 1 - i];
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair of elements. The outer loop picks one element, the inner loop scans the rest. For n elements that is n × (n−1)/2 comparisons = O(n²). No extra memory — just two loop variables.
Each pointer traverses the array at most once. With two pointers moving inward (or both moving right), the total number of steps is bounded by n. Each comparison is O(1), giving O(n) overall. No auxiliary data structures are needed — just two index variables.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.
Wrong move: Advancing both pointers shrinks the search space too aggressively and skips candidates.
Usually fails on: A valid pair can be skipped when only one side should move.
Fix: Move exactly one pointer per decision branch based on invariant.