Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given an n x n integer matrix grid.
Generate an integer matrix maxLocal of size (n - 2) x (n - 2) such that:
maxLocal[i][j] is equal to the largest value of the 3 x 3 matrix in grid centered around row i + 1 and column j + 1.In other words, we want to find the largest value in every contiguous 3 x 3 matrix in grid.
Return the generated matrix.
Example 1:
Input: grid = [[9,9,8,1],[5,6,2,6],[8,2,6,4],[6,2,2,2]] Output: [[9,9],[8,6]] Explanation: The diagram above shows the original matrix and the generated matrix. Notice that each value in the generated matrix corresponds to the largest value of a contiguous 3 x 3 matrix in grid.
Example 2:
Input: grid = [[1,1,1,1,1],[1,1,1,1,1],[1,1,2,1,1],[1,1,1,1,1],[1,1,1,1,1]] Output: [[2,2,2],[2,2,2],[2,2,2]] Explanation: Notice that the 2 is contained within every contiguous 3 x 3 matrix in grid.
Constraints:
n == grid.length == grid[i].length3 <= n <= 1001 <= grid[i][j] <= 100Problem summary: You are given an n x n integer matrix grid. Generate an integer matrix maxLocal of size (n - 2) x (n - 2) such that: maxLocal[i][j] is equal to the largest value of the 3 x 3 matrix in grid centered around row i + 1 and column j + 1. In other words, we want to find the largest value in every contiguous 3 x 3 matrix in grid. Return the generated matrix.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[[9,9,8,1],[5,6,2,6],[8,2,6,4],[6,2,2,2]]
[[1,1,1,1,1],[1,1,1,1,1],[1,1,2,1,1],[1,1,1,1,1],[1,1,1,1,1]]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2373: Largest Local Values in a Matrix
class Solution {
public int[][] largestLocal(int[][] grid) {
int n = grid.length;
int[][] ans = new int[n - 2][n - 2];
for (int i = 0; i < n - 2; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < n - 2; ++j) {
for (int x = i; x <= i + 2; ++x) {
for (int y = j; y <= j + 2; ++y) {
ans[i][j] = Math.max(ans[i][j], grid[x][y]);
}
}
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2373: Largest Local Values in a Matrix
func largestLocal(grid [][]int) [][]int {
n := len(grid)
ans := make([][]int, n-2)
for i := range ans {
ans[i] = make([]int, n-2)
for j := 0; j < n-2; j++ {
for x := i; x <= i+2; x++ {
for y := j; y <= j+2; y++ {
ans[i][j] = max(ans[i][j], grid[x][y])
}
}
}
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2373: Largest Local Values in a Matrix
class Solution:
def largestLocal(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> List[List[int]]:
n = len(grid)
ans = [[0] * (n - 2) for _ in range(n - 2)]
for i in range(n - 2):
for j in range(n - 2):
ans[i][j] = max(
grid[x][y] for x in range(i, i + 3) for y in range(j, j + 3)
)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2373: Largest Local Values in a Matrix
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2373: Largest Local Values in a Matrix
// class Solution {
// public int[][] largestLocal(int[][] grid) {
// int n = grid.length;
// int[][] ans = new int[n - 2][n - 2];
// for (int i = 0; i < n - 2; ++i) {
// for (int j = 0; j < n - 2; ++j) {
// for (int x = i; x <= i + 2; ++x) {
// for (int y = j; y <= j + 2; ++y) {
// ans[i][j] = Math.max(ans[i][j], grid[x][y]);
// }
// }
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2373: Largest Local Values in a Matrix
function largestLocal(grid: number[][]): number[][] {
const n = grid.length;
const res = Array.from({ length: n - 2 }, () => new Array(n - 2).fill(0));
for (let i = 0; i < n - 2; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < n - 2; j++) {
let max = 0;
for (let k = i; k < i + 3; k++) {
for (let z = j; z < j + 3; z++) {
max = Math.max(max, grid[k][z]);
}
}
res[i][j] = max;
}
}
return res;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.