Forgetting null/base-case handling
Wrong move: Recursive traversal assumes children always exist.
Usually fails on: Leaf nodes throw errors or create wrong depth/path values.
Fix: Handle null/base cases before recursive transitions.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on tree fundamentals.
You are given the root of a full binary tree with the following properties:
0 or 1, where 0 represents False and 1 represents True.2 or 3, where 2 represents the boolean OR and 3 represents the boolean AND.The evaluation of a node is as follows:
True or False.Return the boolean result of evaluating the root node.
A full binary tree is a binary tree where each node has either 0 or 2 children.
A leaf node is a node that has zero children.
Example 1:
Input: root = [2,1,3,null,null,0,1] Output: true Explanation: The above diagram illustrates the evaluation process. The AND node evaluates to False AND True = False. The OR node evaluates to True OR False = True. The root node evaluates to True, so we return true.
Example 2:
Input: root = [0] Output: false Explanation: The root node is a leaf node and it evaluates to false, so we return false.
Constraints:
[1, 1000].0 <= Node.val <= 30 or 2 children.0 or 1.2 or 3.Problem summary: You are given the root of a full binary tree with the following properties: Leaf nodes have either the value 0 or 1, where 0 represents False and 1 represents True. Non-leaf nodes have either the value 2 or 3, where 2 represents the boolean OR and 3 represents the boolean AND. The evaluation of a node is as follows: If the node is a leaf node, the evaluation is the value of the node, i.e. True or False. Otherwise, evaluate the node's two children and apply the boolean operation of its value with the children's evaluations. Return the boolean result of evaluating the root node. A full binary tree is a binary tree where each node has either 0 or 2 children. A leaf node is a node that has zero children.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Tree
[2,1,3,null,null,0,1]
[0]
check-if-two-expression-trees-are-equivalent)design-an-expression-tree-with-evaluate-function)minimum-flips-in-binary-tree-to-get-result)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2331: Evaluate Boolean Binary Tree
/**
* Definition for a binary tree node.
* public class TreeNode {
* int val;
* TreeNode left;
* TreeNode right;
* TreeNode() {}
* TreeNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
* TreeNode(int val, TreeNode left, TreeNode right) {
* this.val = val;
* this.left = left;
* this.right = right;
* }
* }
*/
class Solution {
public boolean evaluateTree(TreeNode root) {
if (root.left == null) {
return root.val == 1;
}
if (root.val == 2) {
return evaluateTree(root.left) || evaluateTree(root.right);
}
return evaluateTree(root.left) && evaluateTree(root.right);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2331: Evaluate Boolean Binary Tree
/**
* Definition for a binary tree node.
* type TreeNode struct {
* Val int
* Left *TreeNode
* Right *TreeNode
* }
*/
func evaluateTree(root *TreeNode) bool {
if root.Left == nil {
return root.Val == 1
}
if root.Val == 2 {
return evaluateTree(root.Left) || evaluateTree(root.Right)
} else {
return evaluateTree(root.Left) && evaluateTree(root.Right)
}
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2331: Evaluate Boolean Binary Tree
# Definition for a binary tree node.
# class TreeNode:
# def __init__(self, val=0, left=None, right=None):
# self.val = val
# self.left = left
# self.right = right
class Solution:
def evaluateTree(self, root: Optional[TreeNode]) -> bool:
if root.left is None:
return bool(root.val)
op = or_ if root.val == 2 else and_
return op(self.evaluateTree(root.left), self.evaluateTree(root.right))
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2331: Evaluate Boolean Binary Tree
// Definition for a binary tree node.
// #[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
// pub struct TreeNode {
// pub val: i32,
// pub left: Option<Rc<RefCell<TreeNode>>>,
// pub right: Option<Rc<RefCell<TreeNode>>>,
// }
//
// impl TreeNode {
// #[inline]
// pub fn new(val: i32) -> Self {
// TreeNode {
// val,
// left: None,
// right: None
// }
// }
// }
use std::cell::RefCell;
use std::rc::Rc;
impl Solution {
pub fn evaluate_tree(root: Option<Rc<RefCell<TreeNode>>>) -> bool {
match root {
Some(node) => {
let node = node.borrow();
if node.left.is_none() {
return node.val == 1;
}
if node.val == 2 {
return Self::evaluate_tree(node.left.clone())
|| Self::evaluate_tree(node.right.clone());
}
Self::evaluate_tree(node.left.clone()) && Self::evaluate_tree(node.right.clone())
}
None => false,
}
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2331: Evaluate Boolean Binary Tree
/**
* Definition for a binary tree node.
* class TreeNode {
* val: number
* left: TreeNode | null
* right: TreeNode | null
* constructor(val?: number, left?: TreeNode | null, right?: TreeNode | null) {
* this.val = (val===undefined ? 0 : val)
* this.left = (left===undefined ? null : left)
* this.right = (right===undefined ? null : right)
* }
* }
*/
function evaluateTree(root: TreeNode | null): boolean {
const { val, left, right } = root;
if (left === null) {
return val === 1;
}
if (val === 2) {
return evaluateTree(left) || evaluateTree(right);
}
return evaluateTree(left) && evaluateTree(right);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
BFS with a queue visits every node exactly once — O(n) time. The queue may hold an entire level of the tree, which for a complete binary tree is up to n/2 nodes = O(n) space. This is optimal in time but costly in space for wide trees.
Every node is visited exactly once, giving O(n) time. Space depends on tree shape: O(h) for recursive DFS (stack depth = height h), or O(w) for BFS (queue width = widest level). For balanced trees h = log n; for skewed trees h = n.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Recursive traversal assumes children always exist.
Usually fails on: Leaf nodes throw errors or create wrong depth/path values.
Fix: Handle null/base cases before recursive transitions.