Mutating counts without cleanup
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on hash map fundamentals.
You are given two 0-indexed strings s and target. You can take some letters from s and rearrange them to form new strings.
Return the maximum number of copies of target that can be formed by taking letters from s and rearranging them.
Example 1:
Input: s = "ilovecodingonleetcode", target = "code" Output: 2 Explanation: For the first copy of "code", take the letters at indices 4, 5, 6, and 7. For the second copy of "code", take the letters at indices 17, 18, 19, and 20. The strings that are formed are "ecod" and "code" which can both be rearranged into "code". We can make at most two copies of "code", so we return 2.
Example 2:
Input: s = "abcba", target = "abc" Output: 1 Explanation: We can make one copy of "abc" by taking the letters at indices 0, 1, and 2. We can make at most one copy of "abc", so we return 1. Note that while there is an extra 'a' and 'b' at indices 3 and 4, we cannot reuse the letter 'c' at index 2, so we cannot make a second copy of "abc".
Example 3:
Input: s = "abbaccaddaeea", target = "aaaaa" Output: 1 Explanation: We can make one copy of "aaaaa" by taking the letters at indices 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12. We can make at most one copy of "aaaaa", so we return 1.
Constraints:
1 <= s.length <= 1001 <= target.length <= 10s and target consist of lowercase English letters.Note: This question is the same as 1189: Maximum Number of Balloons.
Problem summary: You are given two 0-indexed strings s and target. You can take some letters from s and rearrange them to form new strings. Return the maximum number of copies of target that can be formed by taking letters from s and rearranging them.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Hash Map
"ilovecodingonleetcode" "code"
"abcba" "abc"
"abbaccaddaeea" "aaaaa"
find-words-that-can-be-formed-by-characters)maximum-number-of-occurrences-of-a-substring)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2287: Rearrange Characters to Make Target String
class Solution {
public int rearrangeCharacters(String s, String target) {
int[] cnt1 = new int[26];
int[] cnt2 = new int[26];
for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); ++i) {
++cnt1[s.charAt(i) - 'a'];
}
for (int i = 0; i < target.length(); ++i) {
++cnt2[target.charAt(i) - 'a'];
}
int ans = 100;
for (int i = 0; i < 26; ++i) {
if (cnt2[i] > 0) {
ans = Math.min(ans, cnt1[i] / cnt2[i]);
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2287: Rearrange Characters to Make Target String
func rearrangeCharacters(s string, target string) int {
var cnt1, cnt2 [26]int
for _, c := range s {
cnt1[c-'a']++
}
for _, c := range target {
cnt2[c-'a']++
}
ans := 100
for i, v := range cnt2 {
if v > 0 {
ans = min(ans, cnt1[i]/v)
}
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2287: Rearrange Characters to Make Target String
class Solution:
def rearrangeCharacters(self, s: str, target: str) -> int:
cnt1 = Counter(s)
cnt2 = Counter(target)
return min(cnt1[c] // v for c, v in cnt2.items())
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2287: Rearrange Characters to Make Target String
impl Solution {
pub fn rearrange_characters(s: String, target: String) -> i32 {
let mut count1 = [0; 26];
let mut count2 = [0; 26];
for c in s.as_bytes() {
count1[(c - b'a') as usize] += 1;
}
for c in target.as_bytes() {
count2[(c - b'a') as usize] += 1;
}
let mut ans = i32::MAX;
for i in 0..26 {
if count2[i] != 0 {
ans = ans.min(count1[i] / count2[i]);
}
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2287: Rearrange Characters to Make Target String
function rearrangeCharacters(s: string, target: string): number {
const idx = (s: string) => s.charCodeAt(0) - 97;
const cnt1 = new Array(26).fill(0);
const cnt2 = new Array(26).fill(0);
for (const c of s) {
++cnt1[idx(c)];
}
for (const c of target) {
++cnt2[idx(c)];
}
let ans = 100;
for (let i = 0; i < 26; ++i) {
if (cnt2[i]) {
ans = Math.min(ans, Math.floor(cnt1[i] / cnt2[i]));
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
For each element, scan the rest of the array looking for a match. Two nested loops give n × (n−1)/2 comparisons = O(n²). No extra space since we only use loop indices.
One pass through the input, performing O(1) hash map lookups and insertions at each step. The hash map may store up to n entries in the worst case. This is the classic space-for-time tradeoff: O(n) extra memory eliminates an inner loop.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.