Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given an integer array nums consisting of 2 * n integers.
You need to divide nums into n pairs such that:
Return true if nums can be divided into n pairs, otherwise return false.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [3,2,3,2,2,2] Output: true Explanation: There are 6 elements in nums, so they should be divided into 6 / 2 = 3 pairs. If nums is divided into the pairs (2, 2), (3, 3), and (2, 2), it will satisfy all the conditions.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4] Output: false Explanation: There is no way to divide nums into 4 / 2 = 2 pairs such that the pairs satisfy every condition.
Constraints:
nums.length == 2 * n1 <= n <= 5001 <= nums[i] <= 500Problem summary: You are given an integer array nums consisting of 2 * n integers. You need to divide nums into n pairs such that: Each element belongs to exactly one pair. The elements present in a pair are equal. Return true if nums can be divided into n pairs, otherwise return false.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Bit Manipulation
[3,2,3,2,2,2]
[1,2,3,4]
sort-array-by-increasing-frequency)distribute-elements-into-two-arrays-i)distribute-elements-into-two-arrays-ii)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2206: Divide Array Into Equal Pairs
class Solution {
public boolean divideArray(int[] nums) {
int[] cnt = new int[510];
for (int v : nums) {
++cnt[v];
}
for (int v : cnt) {
if (v % 2 != 0) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2206: Divide Array Into Equal Pairs
func divideArray(nums []int) bool {
cnt := [510]int{}
for _, x := range nums {
cnt[x]++
}
for _, v := range cnt {
if v%2 != 0 {
return false
}
}
return true
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2206: Divide Array Into Equal Pairs
class Solution:
def divideArray(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool:
cnt = Counter(nums)
return all(v % 2 == 0 for v in cnt.values())
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2206: Divide Array Into Equal Pairs
use std::collections::HashMap;
impl Solution {
pub fn divide_array(nums: Vec<i32>) -> bool {
let mut cnt = HashMap::new();
for x in nums {
*cnt.entry(x).or_insert(0) += 1;
}
cnt.values().all(|&v| v % 2 == 0)
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2206: Divide Array Into Equal Pairs
function divideArray(nums: number[]): boolean {
const cnt = Array(501).fill(0);
for (const x of nums) {
cnt[x]++;
}
for (const x of cnt) {
if (x & 1) return false;
}
return true;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Sort the array in O(n log n), then scan for the missing or unique element by comparing adjacent pairs. Sorting requires O(n) auxiliary space (or O(1) with in-place sort but O(n log n) time remains). The sort step dominates.
Bitwise operations (AND, OR, XOR, shifts) are O(1) per operation on fixed-width integers. A single pass through the input with bit operations gives O(n) time. The key insight: XOR of a number with itself is 0, which eliminates duplicates without extra space.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.