LeetCode #2095 — MEDIUM

Delete the Middle Node of a Linked List

Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using linked list strategy.

Solve on LeetCode
The Problem

Problem Statement

You are given the head of a linked list. Delete the middle node, and return the head of the modified linked list.

The middle node of a linked list of size n is the ⌊n / 2⌋th node from the start using 0-based indexing, where ⌊x⌋ denotes the largest integer less than or equal to x.

  • For n = 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the middle nodes are 0, 1, 1, 2, and 2, respectively.

Example 1:

Input: head = [1,3,4,7,1,2,6]
Output: [1,3,4,1,2,6]
Explanation:
The above figure represents the given linked list. The indices of the nodes are written below.
Since n = 7, node 3 with value 7 is the middle node, which is marked in red.
We return the new list after removing this node. 

Example 2:

Input: head = [1,2,3,4]
Output: [1,2,4]
Explanation:
The above figure represents the given linked list.
For n = 4, node 2 with value 3 is the middle node, which is marked in red.

Example 3:

Input: head = [2,1]
Output: [2]
Explanation:
The above figure represents the given linked list.
For n = 2, node 1 with value 1 is the middle node, which is marked in red.
Node 0 with value 2 is the only node remaining after removing node 1.

Constraints:

  • The number of nodes in the list is in the range [1, 105].
  • 1 <= Node.val <= 105
Patterns Used

Roadmap

  1. Brute Force Baseline
  2. Core Insight
  3. Algorithm Walkthrough
  4. Edge Cases
  5. Full Annotated Code
  6. Interactive Study Demo
  7. Complexity Analysis
Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: You are given the head of a linked list. Delete the middle node, and return the head of the modified linked list. The middle node of a linked list of size n is the ⌊n / 2⌋th node from the start using 0-based indexing, where ⌊x⌋ denotes the largest integer less than or equal to x. For n = 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the middle nodes are 0, 1, 1, 2, and 2, respectively.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Linked List · Two Pointers

Example 1

[1,3,4,7,1,2,6]

Example 2

[1,2,3,4]

Example 3

[2,1]

Related Problems

  • Remove Nth Node From End of List (remove-nth-node-from-end-of-list)
  • Reorder List (reorder-list)
  • Remove Linked List Elements (remove-linked-list-elements)
  • Middle of the Linked List (middle-of-the-linked-list)
Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

  • If a point with a speed s moves n units in a given time, a point with speed 2 * s will move 2 * n units at the same time. Can you use this to find the middle node of a linked list?
  • If you are given the middle node, the node before it, and the node after it, how can you modify the linked list?
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

  1. Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
  2. Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
  3. Record answer candidate when condition is met.
  4. Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Upper-end input sizes
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2095: Delete the Middle Node of a Linked List
/**
 * Definition for singly-linked list.
 * public class ListNode {
 *     int val;
 *     ListNode next;
 *     ListNode() {}
 *     ListNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
 *     ListNode(int val, ListNode next) { this.val = val; this.next = next; }
 * }
 */
class Solution {
    public ListNode deleteMiddle(ListNode head) {
        ListNode dummy = new ListNode(0, head);
        ListNode slow = dummy, fast = head;
        while (fast != null && fast.next != null) {
            slow = slow.next;
            fast = fast.next.next;
        }
        slow.next = slow.next.next;
        return dummy.next;
    }
}
Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time
O(n)
Space
O(1)

Approach Breakdown

COPY TO ARRAY
O(n) time
O(n) space

Copy all n nodes into an array (O(n) time and space), then use array indexing for random access. Operations like reversal or middle-finding become trivial with indices, but the O(n) extra space defeats the purpose of using a linked list.

IN-PLACE POINTERS
O(n) time
O(1) space

Most linked list operations traverse the list once (O(n)) and re-wire pointers in-place (O(1) extra space). The brute force often copies nodes to an array to enable random access, costing O(n) space. In-place pointer manipulation eliminates that.

Shortcut: Traverse once + re-wire pointers → O(n) time, O(1) space. Dummy head nodes simplify edge cases.
Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Losing head/tail while rewiring

Wrong move: Pointer updates overwrite references before they are saved.

Usually fails on: List becomes disconnected mid-operation.

Fix: Store next pointers first and use a dummy head for safer joins.

Moving both pointers on every comparison

Wrong move: Advancing both pointers shrinks the search space too aggressively and skips candidates.

Usually fails on: A valid pair can be skipped when only one side should move.

Fix: Move exactly one pointer per decision branch based on invariant.