Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given an integer array digits, where each element is a digit. The array may contain duplicates.
You need to find all the unique integers that follow the given requirements:
digits in any arbitrary order.For example, if the given digits were [1, 2, 3], integers 132 and 312 follow the requirements.
Return a sorted array of the unique integers.
Example 1:
Input: digits = [2,1,3,0] Output: [102,120,130,132,210,230,302,310,312,320] Explanation: All the possible integers that follow the requirements are in the output array. Notice that there are no odd integers or integers with leading zeros.
Example 2:
Input: digits = [2,2,8,8,2] Output: [222,228,282,288,822,828,882] Explanation: The same digit can be used as many times as it appears in digits. In this example, the digit 8 is used twice each time in 288, 828, and 882.
Example 3:
Input: digits = [3,7,5] Output: [] Explanation: No even integers can be formed using the given digits.
Constraints:
3 <= digits.length <= 1000 <= digits[i] <= 9Problem summary: You are given an integer array digits, where each element is a digit. The array may contain duplicates. You need to find all the unique integers that follow the given requirements: The integer consists of the concatenation of three elements from digits in any arbitrary order. The integer does not have leading zeros. The integer is even. For example, if the given digits were [1, 2, 3], integers 132 and 312 follow the requirements. Return a sorted array of the unique integers.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map
[2,1,3,0]
[2,2,8,8,2]
[3,7,5]
find-numbers-with-even-number-of-digits)unique-3-digit-even-numbers)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2094: Finding 3-Digit Even Numbers
class Solution {
public int[] findEvenNumbers(int[] digits) {
int[] cnt = new int[10];
for (int x : digits) {
++cnt[x];
}
List<Integer> ans = new ArrayList<>();
for (int x = 100; x < 1000; x += 2) {
int[] cnt1 = new int[10];
for (int y = x; y > 0; y /= 10) {
++cnt1[y % 10];
}
boolean ok = true;
for (int i = 0; i < 10 && ok; ++i) {
ok = cnt[i] >= cnt1[i];
}
if (ok) {
ans.add(x);
}
}
return ans.stream().mapToInt(i -> i).toArray();
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2094: Finding 3-Digit Even Numbers
func findEvenNumbers(digits []int) (ans []int) {
cnt := [10]int{}
for _, x := range digits {
cnt[x]++
}
for x := 100; x < 1000; x += 2 {
cnt1 := [10]int{}
for y := x; y > 0; y /= 10 {
cnt1[y%10]++
}
ok := true
for i := 0; i < 10 && ok; i++ {
ok = cnt[i] >= cnt1[i]
}
if ok {
ans = append(ans, x)
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2094: Finding 3-Digit Even Numbers
class Solution:
def findEvenNumbers(self, digits: List[int]) -> List[int]:
cnt = Counter(digits)
ans = []
for x in range(100, 1000, 2):
cnt1 = Counter()
y = x
while y:
y, v = divmod(y, 10)
cnt1[v] += 1
if all(cnt[i] >= cnt1[i] for i in range(10)):
ans.append(x)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2094: Finding 3-Digit Even Numbers
struct Solution;
impl Solution {
fn find_even_numbers(digits: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<i32> {
let mut all = [0; 10];
for d in digits {
all[d as usize] += 1;
}
let mut res = vec![];
let even = vec![0, 2, 4, 6, 8];
for i in 1..=9 {
for j in 0..=9 {
for &k in &even {
let mut count = [0; 10];
count[i] += 1;
count[j] += 1;
count[k] += 1;
if count[i] <= all[i] && count[j] <= all[j] && count[k] <= all[k] {
res.push((i * 100 + j * 10 + k) as i32);
}
}
}
}
res
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let digits = vec![2, 1, 3, 0];
let res = vec![102, 120, 130, 132, 210, 230, 302, 310, 312, 320];
assert_eq!(Solution::find_even_numbers(digits), res);
let digits = vec![2, 2, 8, 8, 2];
let res = vec![222, 228, 282, 288, 822, 828, 882];
assert_eq!(Solution::find_even_numbers(digits), res);
let digits = vec![3, 7, 5];
let res: Vec<i32> = vec![];
assert_eq!(Solution::find_even_numbers(digits), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2094: Finding 3-Digit Even Numbers
function findEvenNumbers(digits: number[]): number[] {
const cnt: number[] = Array(10).fill(0);
for (const x of digits) {
++cnt[x];
}
const ans: number[] = [];
for (let x = 100; x < 1000; x += 2) {
const cnt1: number[] = Array(10).fill(0);
for (let y = x; y; y = Math.floor(y / 10)) {
++cnt1[y % 10];
}
let ok = true;
for (let i = 0; i < 10 && ok; ++i) {
ok = cnt[i] >= cnt1[i];
}
if (ok) {
ans.push(x);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.