LeetCode #2086 — MEDIUM

Minimum Number of Food Buckets to Feed the Hamsters

Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using dynamic programming strategy.

Solve on LeetCode
The Problem

Problem Statement

You are given a 0-indexed string hamsters where hamsters[i] is either:

  • 'H' indicating that there is a hamster at index i, or
  • '.' indicating that index i is empty.

You will add some number of food buckets at the empty indices in order to feed the hamsters. A hamster can be fed if there is at least one food bucket to its left or to its right. More formally, a hamster at index i can be fed if you place a food bucket at index i - 1 and/or at index i + 1.

Return the minimum number of food buckets you should place at empty indices to feed all the hamsters or -1 if it is impossible to feed all of them.

Example 1:

Input: hamsters = "H..H"
Output: 2
Explanation: We place two food buckets at indices 1 and 2.
It can be shown that if we place only one food bucket, one of the hamsters will not be fed.

Example 2:

Input: hamsters = ".H.H."
Output: 1
Explanation: We place one food bucket at index 2.

Example 3:

Input: hamsters = ".HHH."
Output: -1
Explanation: If we place a food bucket at every empty index as shown, the hamster at index 2 will not be able to eat.

Constraints:

  • 1 <= hamsters.length <= 105
  • hamsters[i] is either'H' or '.'.
Patterns Used

Roadmap

  1. Brute Force Baseline
  2. Core Insight
  3. Algorithm Walkthrough
  4. Edge Cases
  5. Full Annotated Code
  6. Interactive Study Demo
  7. Complexity Analysis
Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed string hamsters where hamsters[i] is either: 'H' indicating that there is a hamster at index i, or '.' indicating that index i is empty. You will add some number of food buckets at the empty indices in order to feed the hamsters. A hamster can be fed if there is at least one food bucket to its left or to its right. More formally, a hamster at index i can be fed if you place a food bucket at index i - 1 and/or at index i + 1. Return the minimum number of food buckets you should place at empty indices to feed all the hamsters or -1 if it is impossible to feed all of them.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Dynamic Programming · Greedy

Example 1

"H..H"

Example 2

".H.H."

Example 3

".HHH."

Related Problems

  • Maximum Number of People That Can Be Caught in Tag (maximum-number-of-people-that-can-be-caught-in-tag)
  • Brightest Position on Street (brightest-position-on-street)
Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

  • When is it impossible to feed all the hamsters?
  • When one or more hamsters do not have an empty space adjacent to it.
  • Assuming all previous hamsters are fed. If there is a hamster at index i and you are able to place a bucket at index i - 1 or i + 1, where should you put it?
  • It is always better to place a bucket at index i + 1 because it can feed the next hamster as well.
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

  1. Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
  2. Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
  3. Record answer candidate when condition is met.
  4. Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Upper-end input sizes
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2086: Minimum Number of Food Buckets to Feed the Hamsters
class Solution {
    public int minimumBuckets(String street) {
        int n = street.length();
        int ans = 0;
        for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
            if (street.charAt(i) == 'H') {
                if (i + 1 < n && street.charAt(i + 1) == '.') {
                    ++ans;
                    i += 2;
                } else if (i > 0 && street.charAt(i - 1) == '.') {
                    ++ans;
                } else {
                    return -1;
                }
            }
        }
        return ans;
    }
}
Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time
O(n × m)
Space
O(n × m)

Approach Breakdown

RECURSIVE
O(2ⁿ) time
O(n) space

Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.

DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
O(n × m) time
O(n × m) space

Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.

Shortcut: Count your DP state dimensions → that’s your time. Can you drop one? That’s your space optimization.
Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

State misses one required dimension

Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.

Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.

Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.

Using greedy without proof

Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.

Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.

Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.