Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums. For each index i (1 <= i <= nums.length - 2) the beauty of nums[i] equals:
2, if nums[j] < nums[i] < nums[k], for all 0 <= j < i and for all i < k <= nums.length - 1.1, if nums[i - 1] < nums[i] < nums[i + 1], and the previous condition is not satisfied.0, if none of the previous conditions holds.Return the sum of beauty of all nums[i] where 1 <= i <= nums.length - 2.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,3] Output: 2 Explanation: For each index i in the range 1 <= i <= 1: - The beauty of nums[1] equals 2.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [2,4,6,4] Output: 1 Explanation: For each index i in the range 1 <= i <= 2: - The beauty of nums[1] equals 1. - The beauty of nums[2] equals 0.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [3,2,1] Output: 0 Explanation: For each index i in the range 1 <= i <= 1: - The beauty of nums[1] equals 0.
Constraints:
3 <= nums.length <= 1051 <= nums[i] <= 105Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums. For each index i (1 <= i <= nums.length - 2) the beauty of nums[i] equals: 2, if nums[j] < nums[i] < nums[k], for all 0 <= j < i and for all i < k <= nums.length - 1. 1, if nums[i - 1] < nums[i] < nums[i + 1], and the previous condition is not satisfied. 0, if none of the previous conditions holds. Return the sum of beauty of all nums[i] where 1 <= i <= nums.length - 2.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[1,2,3]
[2,4,6,4]
[3,2,1]
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock)partition-array-into-disjoint-intervals)maximum-value-of-an-ordered-triplet-ii)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2012: Sum of Beauty in the Array
class Solution {
public int sumOfBeauties(int[] nums) {
int n = nums.length;
int[] right = new int[n];
right[n - 1] = nums[n - 1];
for (int i = n - 2; i > 0; --i) {
right[i] = Math.min(right[i + 1], nums[i]);
}
int ans = 0;
int l = nums[0];
for (int i = 1; i < n - 1; ++i) {
int r = right[i + 1];
if (l < nums[i] && nums[i] < r) {
ans += 2;
} else if (nums[i - 1] < nums[i] && nums[i] < nums[i + 1]) {
ans += 1;
}
l = Math.max(l, nums[i]);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2012: Sum of Beauty in the Array
func sumOfBeauties(nums []int) (ans int) {
n := len(nums)
right := make([]int, n)
right[n-1] = nums[n-1]
for i := n - 2; i > 0; i-- {
right[i] = min(right[i+1], nums[i])
}
for i, l := 1, nums[0]; i < n-1; i++ {
r := right[i+1]
if l < nums[i] && nums[i] < r {
ans += 2
} else if nums[i-1] < nums[i] && nums[i] < nums[i+1] {
ans++
}
l = max(l, nums[i])
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2012: Sum of Beauty in the Array
class Solution:
def sumOfBeauties(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(nums)
right = [nums[-1]] * n
for i in range(n - 2, -1, -1):
right[i] = min(right[i + 1], nums[i])
ans = 0
l = nums[0]
for i in range(1, n - 1):
r = right[i + 1]
if l < nums[i] < r:
ans += 2
elif nums[i - 1] < nums[i] < nums[i + 1]:
ans += 1
l = max(l, nums[i])
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2012: Sum of Beauty in the Array
impl Solution {
pub fn sum_of_beauties(nums: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let n = nums.len();
let mut right: Vec<i32> = vec![0; n];
right[n - 1] = nums[n - 1];
for i in (1..n - 1).rev() {
right[i] = right[i + 1].min(nums[i]);
}
let mut ans = 0;
let mut l = nums[0];
for i in 1..n - 1 {
let r = right[i + 1];
if l < nums[i] && nums[i] < r {
ans += 2;
} else if nums[i - 1] < nums[i] && nums[i] < nums[i + 1] {
ans += 1;
}
l = l.max(nums[i]);
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2012: Sum of Beauty in the Array
function sumOfBeauties(nums: number[]): number {
const n = nums.length;
const right: number[] = Array(n).fill(nums[n - 1]);
for (let i = n - 2; i; --i) {
right[i] = Math.min(right[i + 1], nums[i]);
}
let ans = 0;
for (let i = 1, l = nums[0]; i < n - 1; ++i) {
const r = right[i + 1];
if (l < nums[i] && nums[i] < r) {
ans += 2;
} else if (nums[i - 1] < nums[i] && nums[i] < nums[i + 1]) {
ans += 1;
}
l = Math.max(l, nums[i]);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.