Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You have n boxes. You are given a binary string boxes of length n, where boxes[i] is '0' if the ith box is empty, and '1' if it contains one ball.
In one operation, you can move one ball from a box to an adjacent box. Box i is adjacent to box j if abs(i - j) == 1. Note that after doing so, there may be more than one ball in some boxes.
Return an array answer of size n, where answer[i] is the minimum number of operations needed to move all the balls to the ith box.
Each answer[i] is calculated considering the initial state of the boxes.
Example 1:
Input: boxes = "110" Output: [1,1,3] Explanation: The answer for each box is as follows: 1) First box: you will have to move one ball from the second box to the first box in one operation. 2) Second box: you will have to move one ball from the first box to the second box in one operation. 3) Third box: you will have to move one ball from the first box to the third box in two operations, and move one ball from the second box to the third box in one operation.
Example 2:
Input: boxes = "001011" Output: [11,8,5,4,3,4]
Constraints:
n == boxes.length1 <= n <= 2000boxes[i] is either '0' or '1'.Problem summary: You have n boxes. You are given a binary string boxes of length n, where boxes[i] is '0' if the ith box is empty, and '1' if it contains one ball. In one operation, you can move one ball from a box to an adjacent box. Box i is adjacent to box j if abs(i - j) == 1. Note that after doing so, there may be more than one ball in some boxes. Return an array answer of size n, where answer[i] is the minimum number of operations needed to move all the balls to the ith box. Each answer[i] is calculated considering the initial state of the boxes.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
"110"
"001011"
minimum-cost-to-move-chips-to-the-same-position)minimum-moves-to-spread-stones-over-grid)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1769: Minimum Number of Operations to Move All Balls to Each Box
class Solution {
public int[] minOperations(String boxes) {
int n = boxes.length();
int[] left = new int[n];
int[] right = new int[n];
for (int i = 1, cnt = 0; i < n; ++i) {
if (boxes.charAt(i - 1) == '1') {
++cnt;
}
left[i] = left[i - 1] + cnt;
}
for (int i = n - 2, cnt = 0; i >= 0; --i) {
if (boxes.charAt(i + 1) == '1') {
++cnt;
}
right[i] = right[i + 1] + cnt;
}
int[] ans = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
ans[i] = left[i] + right[i];
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1769: Minimum Number of Operations to Move All Balls to Each Box
func minOperations(boxes string) []int {
n := len(boxes)
left := make([]int, n)
right := make([]int, n)
for i, cnt := 1, 0; i < n; i++ {
if boxes[i-1] == '1' {
cnt++
}
left[i] = left[i-1] + cnt
}
for i, cnt := n-2, 0; i >= 0; i-- {
if boxes[i+1] == '1' {
cnt++
}
right[i] = right[i+1] + cnt
}
ans := make([]int, n)
for i := range ans {
ans[i] = left[i] + right[i]
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1769: Minimum Number of Operations to Move All Balls to Each Box
class Solution:
def minOperations(self, boxes: str) -> List[int]:
n = len(boxes)
left = [0] * n
right = [0] * n
cnt = 0
for i in range(1, n):
if boxes[i - 1] == '1':
cnt += 1
left[i] = left[i - 1] + cnt
cnt = 0
for i in range(n - 2, -1, -1):
if boxes[i + 1] == '1':
cnt += 1
right[i] = right[i + 1] + cnt
return [a + b for a, b in zip(left, right)]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1769: Minimum Number of Operations to Move All Balls to Each Box
impl Solution {
pub fn min_operations(boxes: String) -> Vec<i32> {
let s = boxes.as_bytes();
let n = s.len();
let mut left = vec![0; n];
let mut right = vec![0; n];
let mut count = 0;
for i in 1..n {
if s[i - 1] == b'1' {
count += 1;
}
left[i] = left[i - 1] + count;
}
count = 0;
for i in (0..n - 1).rev() {
if s[i + 1] == b'1' {
count += 1;
}
right[i] = right[i + 1] + count;
}
(0..n).into_iter().map(|i| left[i] + right[i]).collect()
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1769: Minimum Number of Operations to Move All Balls to Each Box
function minOperations(boxes: string): number[] {
const n = boxes.length;
const left = new Array(n).fill(0);
const right = new Array(n).fill(0);
for (let i = 1, count = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (boxes[i - 1] == '1') {
count++;
}
left[i] = left[i - 1] + count;
}
for (let i = n - 2, count = 0; i >= 0; i--) {
if (boxes[i + 1] == '1') {
count++;
}
right[i] = right[i + 1] + count;
}
return left.map((v, i) => v + right[i]);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.