Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
An undirected graph of n nodes is defined by edgeList, where edgeList[i] = [ui, vi, disi] denotes an edge between nodes ui and vi with distance disi. Note that there may be multiple edges between two nodes.
Given an array queries, where queries[j] = [pj, qj, limitj], your task is to determine for each queries[j] whether there is a path between pj and qj such that each edge on the path has a distance strictly less than limitj .
Return a boolean array answer, where answer.length == queries.length and the jth value of answer is true if there is a path for queries[j] is true, and false otherwise.
Example 1:
Input: n = 3, edgeList = [[0,1,2],[1,2,4],[2,0,8],[1,0,16]], queries = [[0,1,2],[0,2,5]] Output: [false,true] Explanation: The above figure shows the given graph. Note that there are two overlapping edges between 0 and 1 with distances 2 and 16. For the first query, between 0 and 1 there is no path where each distance is less than 2, thus we return false for this query. For the second query, there is a path (0 -> 1 -> 2) of two edges with distances less than 5, thus we return true for this query.
Example 2:
Input: n = 5, edgeList = [[0,1,10],[1,2,5],[2,3,9],[3,4,13]], queries = [[0,4,14],[1,4,13]] Output: [true,false] Explanation: The above figure shows the given graph.
Constraints:
2 <= n <= 1051 <= edgeList.length, queries.length <= 105edgeList[i].length == 3queries[j].length == 30 <= ui, vi, pj, qj <= n - 1ui != vipj != qj1 <= disi, limitj <= 109Problem summary: An undirected graph of n nodes is defined by edgeList, where edgeList[i] = [ui, vi, disi] denotes an edge between nodes ui and vi with distance disi. Note that there may be multiple edges between two nodes. Given an array queries, where queries[j] = [pj, qj, limitj], your task is to determine for each queries[j] whether there is a path between pj and qj such that each edge on the path has a distance strictly less than limitj . Return a boolean array answer, where answer.length == queries.length and the jth value of answer is true if there is a path for queries[j] is true, and false otherwise.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Two Pointers · Union-Find
3 [[0,1,2],[1,2,4],[2,0,8],[1,0,16]] [[0,1,2],[0,2,5]]
5 [[0,1,10],[1,2,5],[2,3,9],[3,4,13]] [[0,4,14],[1,4,13]]
checking-existence-of-edge-length-limited-paths-ii)number-of-good-paths)minimum-score-of-a-path-between-two-cities)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1697: Checking Existence of Edge Length Limited Paths
class Solution {
private int[] p;
public boolean[] distanceLimitedPathsExist(int n, int[][] edgeList, int[][] queries) {
p = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
p[i] = i;
}
Arrays.sort(edgeList, (a, b) -> a[2] - b[2]);
int m = queries.length;
boolean[] ans = new boolean[m];
Integer[] qid = new Integer[m];
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
qid[i] = i;
}
Arrays.sort(qid, (i, j) -> queries[i][2] - queries[j][2]);
int j = 0;
for (int i : qid) {
int a = queries[i][0], b = queries[i][1], limit = queries[i][2];
while (j < edgeList.length && edgeList[j][2] < limit) {
int u = edgeList[j][0], v = edgeList[j][1];
p[find(u)] = find(v);
++j;
}
ans[i] = find(a) == find(b);
}
return ans;
}
private int find(int x) {
if (p[x] != x) {
p[x] = find(p[x]);
}
return p[x];
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1697: Checking Existence of Edge Length Limited Paths
func distanceLimitedPathsExist(n int, edgeList [][]int, queries [][]int) []bool {
p := make([]int, n)
for i := range p {
p[i] = i
}
sort.Slice(edgeList, func(i, j int) bool { return edgeList[i][2] < edgeList[j][2] })
var find func(int) int
find = func(x int) int {
if p[x] != x {
p[x] = find(p[x])
}
return p[x]
}
m := len(queries)
qid := make([]int, m)
ans := make([]bool, m)
for i := range qid {
qid[i] = i
}
sort.Slice(qid, func(i, j int) bool { return queries[qid[i]][2] < queries[qid[j]][2] })
j := 0
for _, i := range qid {
a, b, limit := queries[i][0], queries[i][1], queries[i][2]
for j < len(edgeList) && edgeList[j][2] < limit {
u, v := edgeList[j][0], edgeList[j][1]
p[find(u)] = find(v)
j++
}
ans[i] = find(a) == find(b)
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1697: Checking Existence of Edge Length Limited Paths
class Solution:
def distanceLimitedPathsExist(
self, n: int, edgeList: List[List[int]], queries: List[List[int]]
) -> List[bool]:
def find(x):
if p[x] != x:
p[x] = find(p[x])
return p[x]
p = list(range(n))
edgeList.sort(key=lambda x: x[2])
j = 0
ans = [False] * len(queries)
for i, (a, b, limit) in sorted(enumerate(queries), key=lambda x: x[1][2]):
while j < len(edgeList) and edgeList[j][2] < limit:
u, v, _ = edgeList[j]
p[find(u)] = find(v)
j += 1
ans[i] = find(a) == find(b)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1697: Checking Existence of Edge Length Limited Paths
impl Solution {
#[allow(dead_code)]
pub fn distance_limited_paths_exist(
n: i32,
edge_list: Vec<Vec<i32>>,
queries: Vec<Vec<i32>>,
) -> Vec<bool> {
let mut disjoint_set: Vec<usize> = vec![0; n as usize];
let mut ans_vec: Vec<bool> = vec![false; queries.len()];
let mut q_vec: Vec<usize> = vec![0; queries.len()];
// Initialize the set
for i in 0..n {
disjoint_set[i as usize] = i as usize;
}
// Initialize the q_vec
for i in 0..queries.len() {
q_vec[i] = i;
}
// Sort the q_vec based on the query limit, from the lowest to highest
q_vec.sort_by(|i, j| queries[*i][2].cmp(&queries[*j][2]));
// Sort the edge_list based on the edge weight, from the lowest to highest
let mut edge_list = edge_list.clone();
edge_list.sort_by(|i, j| i[2].cmp(&j[2]));
let mut edge_idx: usize = 0;
for q_idx in &q_vec {
let s = queries[*q_idx][0] as usize;
let d = queries[*q_idx][1] as usize;
let limit = queries[*q_idx][2];
// Construct the disjoint set
while edge_idx < edge_list.len() && edge_list[edge_idx][2] < limit {
Solution::union(
edge_list[edge_idx][0] as usize,
edge_list[edge_idx][1] as usize,
&mut disjoint_set,
);
edge_idx += 1;
}
// If the parents of s & d are the same, this query should be `true`
// Otherwise, the current query is `false`
ans_vec[*q_idx] = Solution::check_valid(s, d, &mut disjoint_set);
}
ans_vec
}
#[allow(dead_code)]
pub fn find(x: usize, d_set: &mut Vec<usize>) -> usize {
if d_set[x] != x {
d_set[x] = Solution::find(d_set[x], d_set);
}
return d_set[x];
}
#[allow(dead_code)]
pub fn union(s: usize, d: usize, d_set: &mut Vec<usize>) {
let p_s = Solution::find(s, d_set);
let p_d = Solution::find(d, d_set);
d_set[p_s] = p_d;
}
#[allow(dead_code)]
pub fn check_valid(s: usize, d: usize, d_set: &mut Vec<usize>) -> bool {
let p_s = Solution::find(s, d_set);
let p_d = Solution::find(d, d_set);
p_s == p_d
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1697: Checking Existence of Edge Length Limited Paths
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1697: Checking Existence of Edge Length Limited Paths
// class Solution {
// private int[] p;
//
// public boolean[] distanceLimitedPathsExist(int n, int[][] edgeList, int[][] queries) {
// p = new int[n];
// for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
// p[i] = i;
// }
// Arrays.sort(edgeList, (a, b) -> a[2] - b[2]);
// int m = queries.length;
// boolean[] ans = new boolean[m];
// Integer[] qid = new Integer[m];
// for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
// qid[i] = i;
// }
// Arrays.sort(qid, (i, j) -> queries[i][2] - queries[j][2]);
// int j = 0;
// for (int i : qid) {
// int a = queries[i][0], b = queries[i][1], limit = queries[i][2];
// while (j < edgeList.length && edgeList[j][2] < limit) {
// int u = edgeList[j][0], v = edgeList[j][1];
// p[find(u)] = find(v);
// ++j;
// }
// ans[i] = find(a) == find(b);
// }
// return ans;
// }
//
// private int find(int x) {
// if (p[x] != x) {
// p[x] = find(p[x]);
// }
// return p[x];
// }
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair of elements. The outer loop picks one element, the inner loop scans the rest. For n elements that is n × (n−1)/2 comparisons = O(n²). No extra memory — just two loop variables.
Each pointer traverses the array at most once. With two pointers moving inward (or both moving right), the total number of steps is bounded by n. Each comparison is O(1), giving O(n) overall. No auxiliary data structures are needed — just two index variables.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Advancing both pointers shrinks the search space too aggressively and skips candidates.
Usually fails on: A valid pair can be skipped when only one side should move.
Fix: Move exactly one pointer per decision branch based on invariant.