Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
Table: Users
+----------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +----------------+---------+ | user_id | int | | name | varchar | +----------------+---------+ user_id is the primary key (column with unique values) for this table. This table contains the ID and the name of the user. The name consists of only lowercase and uppercase characters.
Write a solution to fix the names so that only the first character is uppercase and the rest are lowercase.
Return the result table ordered by user_id.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1:
Input: Users table: +---------+-------+ | user_id | name | +---------+-------+ | 1 | aLice | | 2 | bOB | +---------+-------+ Output: +---------+-------+ | user_id | name | +---------+-------+ | 1 | Alice | | 2 | Bob | +---------+-------+
Problem summary: Table: Users +----------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +----------------+---------+ | user_id | int | | name | varchar | +----------------+---------+ user_id is the primary key (column with unique values) for this table. This table contains the ID and the name of the user. The name consists of only lowercase and uppercase characters. Write a solution to fix the names so that only the first character is uppercase and the rest are lowercase. Return the result table ordered by user_id. The result format is in the following example.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers":{"Users":["user_id","name"]},"rows":{"Users":[[1,"aLice"],[2,"bOB"]]}}Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
// Auto-generated Java example from rust.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (rust):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
// pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
// r#"
// -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
// SELECT
// user_id,
// CONCAT(UPPER(LEFT(name, 1)), LOWER(SUBSTRING(name, 2))) AS name
// FROM users
// ORDER BY user_id;
// "#
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
// Auto-generated Go example from rust.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (rust):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
// pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
// r#"
// -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
// SELECT
// user_id,
// CONCAT(UPPER(LEFT(name, 1)), LOWER(SUBSTRING(name, 2))) AS name
// FROM users
// ORDER BY user_id;
// "#
// }
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
# Auto-generated Python example from rust.
def example_solution() -> None:
return
# Reference (rust):
# // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
# pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
# r#"
# -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
# SELECT
# user_id,
# CONCAT(UPPER(LEFT(name, 1)), LOWER(SUBSTRING(name, 2))) AS name
# FROM users
# ORDER BY user_id;
# "#
# }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
r#"
-- Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
SELECT
user_id,
CONCAT(UPPER(LEFT(name, 1)), LOWER(SUBSTRING(name, 2))) AS name
FROM users
ORDER BY user_id;
"#
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from rust.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (rust):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
// pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
// r#"
// -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #1667: Fix Names in a Table
// SELECT
// user_id,
// CONCAT(UPPER(LEFT(name, 1)), LOWER(SUBSTRING(name, 2))) AS name
// FROM users
// ORDER BY user_id;
// "#
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.