Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
There is a stream of n (idKey, value) pairs arriving in an arbitrary order, where idKey is an integer between 1 and n and value is a string. No two pairs have the same id.
Design a stream that returns the values in increasing order of their IDs by returning a chunk (list) of values after each insertion. The concatenation of all the chunks should result in a list of the sorted values.
Implement the OrderedStream class:
OrderedStream(int n) Constructs the stream to take n values.String[] insert(int idKey, String value) Inserts the pair (idKey, value) into the stream, then returns the largest possible chunk of currently inserted values that appear next in the order.Example:
Input ["OrderedStream", "insert", "insert", "insert", "insert", "insert"] [[5], [3, "ccccc"], [1, "aaaaa"], [2, "bbbbb"], [5, "eeeee"], [4, "ddddd"]] Output [null, [], ["aaaaa"], ["bbbbb", "ccccc"], [], ["ddddd", "eeeee"]] Explanation // Note that the values ordered by ID is ["aaaaa", "bbbbb", "ccccc", "ddddd", "eeeee"]. OrderedStream os = new OrderedStream(5); os.insert(3, "ccccc"); // Inserts (3, "ccccc"), returns []. os.insert(1, "aaaaa"); // Inserts (1, "aaaaa"), returns ["aaaaa"]. os.insert(2, "bbbbb"); // Inserts (2, "bbbbb"), returns ["bbbbb", "ccccc"]. os.insert(5, "eeeee"); // Inserts (5, "eeeee"), returns []. os.insert(4, "ddddd"); // Inserts (4, "ddddd"), returns ["ddddd", "eeeee"]. // Concatentating all the chunks returned: // [] + ["aaaaa"] + ["bbbbb", "ccccc"] + [] + ["ddddd", "eeeee"] = ["aaaaa", "bbbbb", "ccccc", "ddddd", "eeeee"] // The resulting order is the same as the order above.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 10001 <= id <= nvalue.length == 5value consists only of lowercase letters.insert will have a unique id.n calls will be made to insert.Problem summary: There is a stream of n (idKey, value) pairs arriving in an arbitrary order, where idKey is an integer between 1 and n and value is a string. No two pairs have the same id. Design a stream that returns the values in increasing order of their IDs by returning a chunk (list) of values after each insertion. The concatenation of all the chunks should result in a list of the sorted values. Implement the OrderedStream class: OrderedStream(int n) Constructs the stream to take n values. String[] insert(int idKey, String value) Inserts the pair (idKey, value) into the stream, then returns the largest possible chunk of currently inserted values that appear next in the order.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Design
["OrderedStream","insert","insert","insert","insert","insert"] [[5],[3,"ccccc"],[1,"aaaaa"],[2,"bbbbb"],[5,"eeeee"],[4,"ddddd"]]
longest-uploaded-prefix)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1656: Design an Ordered Stream
class OrderedStream {
private int ptr = 1;
private String[] data;
public OrderedStream(int n) {
data = new String[n + 1];
}
public List<String> insert(int idKey, String value) {
data[idKey] = value;
List<String> ans = new ArrayList<>();
while (ptr < data.length && data[ptr] != null) {
ans.add(data[ptr++]);
}
return ans;
}
}
/**
* Your OrderedStream object will be instantiated and called as such:
* OrderedStream obj = new OrderedStream(n);
* List<String> param_1 = obj.insert(idKey,value);
*/
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1656: Design an Ordered Stream
type OrderedStream struct {
ptr int
data []string
}
func Constructor(n int) OrderedStream {
return OrderedStream{
ptr: 1,
data: make([]string, n+1),
}
}
func (this *OrderedStream) Insert(idKey int, value string) []string {
this.data[idKey] = value
var ans []string
for this.ptr < len(this.data) && this.data[this.ptr] != "" {
ans = append(ans, this.data[this.ptr])
this.ptr++
}
return ans
}
/**
* Your OrderedStream object will be instantiated and called as such:
* obj := Constructor(n);
* param_1 := obj.Insert(idKey,value);
*/
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1656: Design an Ordered Stream
class OrderedStream:
def __init__(self, n: int):
self.ptr = 1
self.data = [None] * (n + 1)
def insert(self, idKey: int, value: str) -> List[str]:
self.data[idKey] = value
ans = []
while self.ptr < len(self.data) and self.data[self.ptr]:
ans.append(self.data[self.ptr])
self.ptr += 1
return ans
# Your OrderedStream object will be instantiated and called as such:
# obj = OrderedStream(n)
# param_1 = obj.insert(idKey,value)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1656: Design an Ordered Stream
struct OrderedStream {
ptr: usize,
data: Vec<Option<String>>,
}
impl OrderedStream {
fn new(n: i32) -> Self {
OrderedStream {
ptr: 1,
data: vec![None; (n + 1) as usize],
}
}
fn insert(&mut self, id_key: i32, value: String) -> Vec<String> {
self.data[id_key as usize] = Some(value);
let mut ans = Vec::new();
while self.ptr < self.data.len() && self.data[self.ptr].is_some() {
ans.push(self.data[self.ptr].take().unwrap());
self.ptr += 1;
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1656: Design an Ordered Stream
class OrderedStream {
private ptr: number;
private data: string[];
constructor(n: number) {
this.ptr = 1;
this.data = Array(n + 1);
}
insert(idKey: number, value: string): string[] {
this.data[idKey] = value;
const ans: string[] = [];
while (this.data[this.ptr]) {
ans.push(this.data[this.ptr++]);
}
return ans;
}
}
/**
* Your OrderedStream object will be instantiated and called as such:
* var obj = new OrderedStream(n)
* var param_1 = obj.insert(idKey,value)
*/
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Use a simple list or array for storage. Each operation (get, put, remove) requires a linear scan to find the target element — O(n) per operation. Space is O(n) to store the data. The linear search makes this impractical for frequent operations.
Design problems target O(1) amortized per operation by combining data structures (hash map + doubly-linked list for LRU, stack + min-tracking for MinStack). Space is always at least O(n) to store the data. The challenge is achieving constant-time operations through clever structure composition.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.