Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
Given an m x n binary matrix mat, return the number of special positions in mat.
A position (i, j) is called special if mat[i][j] == 1 and all other elements in row i and column j are 0 (rows and columns are 0-indexed).
Example 1:
Input: mat = [[1,0,0],[0,0,1],[1,0,0]] Output: 1 Explanation: (1, 2) is a special position because mat[1][2] == 1 and all other elements in row 1 and column 2 are 0.
Example 2:
Input: mat = [[1,0,0],[0,1,0],[0,0,1]] Output: 3 Explanation: (0, 0), (1, 1) and (2, 2) are special positions.
Constraints:
m == mat.lengthn == mat[i].length1 <= m, n <= 100mat[i][j] is either 0 or 1.Problem summary: Given an m x n binary matrix mat, return the number of special positions in mat. A position (i, j) is called special if mat[i][j] == 1 and all other elements in row i and column j are 0 (rows and columns are 0-indexed).
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[[1,0,0],[0,0,1],[1,0,0]]
[[1,0,0],[0,1,0],[0,0,1]]
difference-between-ones-and-zeros-in-row-and-column)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1582: Special Positions in a Binary Matrix
class Solution {
public int numSpecial(int[][] mat) {
int m = mat.length, n = mat[0].length;
int[] rows = new int[m];
int[] cols = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
rows[i] += mat[i][j];
cols[j] += mat[i][j];
}
}
int ans = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
if (mat[i][j] == 1 && rows[i] == 1 && cols[j] == 1) {
ans++;
}
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1582: Special Positions in a Binary Matrix
func numSpecial(mat [][]int) (ans int) {
rows := make([]int, len(mat))
cols := make([]int, len(mat[0]))
for i, row := range mat {
for j, x := range row {
rows[i] += x
cols[j] += x
}
}
for i, row := range mat {
for j, x := range row {
if x == 1 && rows[i] == 1 && cols[j] == 1 {
ans++
}
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1582: Special Positions in a Binary Matrix
class Solution:
def numSpecial(self, mat: List[List[int]]) -> int:
rows = [0] * len(mat)
cols = [0] * len(mat[0])
for i, row in enumerate(mat):
for j, x in enumerate(row):
rows[i] += x
cols[j] += x
ans = 0
for i, row in enumerate(mat):
for j, x in enumerate(row):
ans += x == 1 and rows[i] == 1 and cols[j] == 1
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1582: Special Positions in a Binary Matrix
impl Solution {
pub fn num_special(mat: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> i32 {
let m = mat.len();
let n = mat[0].len();
let mut rows = vec![0; m];
let mut cols = vec![0; n];
for i in 0..m {
for j in 0..n {
rows[i] += mat[i][j];
cols[j] += mat[i][j];
}
}
let mut ans = 0;
for i in 0..m {
for j in 0..n {
if mat[i][j] == 1 && rows[i] == 1 && cols[j] == 1 {
ans += 1;
}
}
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1582: Special Positions in a Binary Matrix
function numSpecial(mat: number[][]): number {
const m = mat.length;
const n = mat[0].length;
const rows: number[] = Array(m).fill(0);
const cols: number[] = Array(n).fill(0);
for (let i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
for (let j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
rows[i] += mat[i][j];
cols[j] += mat[i][j];
}
}
let ans = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
for (let j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
if (mat[i][j] === 1 && rows[i] === 1 && cols[j] === 1) {
++ans;
}
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.