Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
Given a square matrix mat, return the sum of the matrix diagonals.
Only include the sum of all the elements on the primary diagonal and all the elements on the secondary diagonal that are not part of the primary diagonal.
Example 1:
Input: mat = [[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7,8,9]] Output: 25 Explanation: Diagonals sum: 1 + 5 + 9 + 3 + 7 = 25 Notice that element mat[1][1] = 5 is counted only once.
Example 2:
Input: mat = [[1,1,1,1], [1,1,1,1], [1,1,1,1], [1,1,1,1]] Output: 8
Example 3:
Input: mat = [[5]] Output: 5
Constraints:
n == mat.length == mat[i].length1 <= n <= 1001 <= mat[i][j] <= 100Problem summary: Given a square matrix mat, return the sum of the matrix diagonals. Only include the sum of all the elements on the primary diagonal and all the elements on the secondary diagonal that are not part of the primary diagonal.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9]]
[[1,1,1,1],[1,1,1,1],[1,1,1,1],[1,1,1,1]]
[[5]]
check-if-every-row-and-column-contains-all-numbers)check-if-matrix-is-x-matrix)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1572: Matrix Diagonal Sum
class Solution {
public int diagonalSum(int[][] mat) {
int ans = 0;
int n = mat.length;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
int j = n - i - 1;
ans += mat[i][i] + (i == j ? 0 : mat[i][j]);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1572: Matrix Diagonal Sum
func diagonalSum(mat [][]int) (ans int) {
n := len(mat)
for i, row := range mat {
ans += row[i]
if j := n - i - 1; j != i {
ans += row[j]
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1572: Matrix Diagonal Sum
class Solution:
def diagonalSum(self, mat: List[List[int]]) -> int:
ans = 0
n = len(mat)
for i, row in enumerate(mat):
j = n - i - 1
ans += row[i] + (0 if j == i else row[j])
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1572: Matrix Diagonal Sum
impl Solution {
pub fn diagonal_sum(mat: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> i32 {
let n = mat.len();
let mut ans = 0;
for i in 0..n {
ans += mat[i][i];
let j = n - i - 1;
if j != i {
ans += mat[i][j];
}
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1572: Matrix Diagonal Sum
function diagonalSum(mat: number[][]): number {
let ans = 0;
const n = mat.length;
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
const j = n - i - 1;
ans += mat[i][i] + (i === j ? 0 : mat[i][j]);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.